Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Infracost

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Infracost actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Infracost
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Infracost
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Infracost
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Depot
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Depot
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Depot
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Infracost?
- Depot starts at Free and Infracost at Free.
- Does Depot or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Infracost cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceInfracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Infracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Terragrunt
- Depot vs Pulumi
- Depot vs Packer
- Depot vs Serverless Framework
- Depot vs SST
- Depot vs Coolify
- Depot vs CapRover
- Depot vs DeepInfra
- Depot vs Linode
- Depot vs VictoriaMetrics
- Depot vs Contabo
- Depot vs Chef
- Depot vs Cilium
- Depot vs Vagrant
- Depot vs containerd
- Infracost vs WarpBuild
- Infracost vs Blacksmith
- Infracost vs Nixpacks
- Infracost vs Buildkite
- Infracost vs GitLab CI/CD
- Infracost vs Namespace
- Infracost vs Earthly
- Infracost vs Nx Cloud
- Infracost vs Dagger
- Infracost vs Garden
- Infracost vs Ansible
- Infracost vs ConfigCat
- Infracost vs Avo
- Infracost vs Azure DevOps
- Infracost vs Backstage
- Infracost vs Bitbucket
- Infracost vs Claude Code
- Infracost vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs containerd
