Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Trivy

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Trivy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Trivy
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Trivy
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Trivy
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Depot
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Depot
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Trivy?
- Depot starts at Free and Trivy at Free.
- Does Depot or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Trivy cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceTrivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceTrivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceTrivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Grype
- Depot vs Snyk
- Depot vs Chainguard
- Depot vs Semgrep
- Depot vs Bitwarden
- Depot vs Infisical
- Depot vs Authelia
- Depot vs Ory Kratos
- Depot vs HashiCorp Vault
- Depot vs Arnica
- Depot vs OWASP ZAP
- Depot vs Proton Mail
- Depot vs Veriff
- Depot vs Brave Browser
- Depot vs March Networks
- Depot vs Salient CompleteView
- Depot vs Sumsub
- Depot vs Syft
- Trivy vs WarpBuild
- Trivy vs Blacksmith
- Trivy vs Nixpacks
- Trivy vs Buildkite
- Trivy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Trivy vs Namespace
- Trivy vs Earthly
- Trivy vs Nx Cloud
- Trivy vs Dagger
- Trivy vs Garden
- Trivy vs Ansible
- Trivy vs ConfigCat
- Trivy vs Avo
- Trivy vs Azure DevOps
- Trivy vs Backstage
- Trivy vs Bitbucket
- Trivy vs Claude Code
- Trivy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
