Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Trivy

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Trivy
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Trivy
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Trivy
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Blacksmith
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Blacksmith
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Trivy?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Trivy at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Trivy cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceTrivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceTrivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceTrivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Grype
- Blacksmith vs Snyk
- Blacksmith vs Chainguard
- Blacksmith vs Semgrep
- Blacksmith vs Bitwarden
- Blacksmith vs Infisical
- Blacksmith vs Authelia
- Blacksmith vs Ory Kratos
- Blacksmith vs HashiCorp Vault
- Blacksmith vs Arnica
- Blacksmith vs OWASP ZAP
- Blacksmith vs Proton Mail
- Blacksmith vs Veriff
- Blacksmith vs Brave Browser
- Blacksmith vs March Networks
- Blacksmith vs Salient CompleteView
- Blacksmith vs Sumsub
- Blacksmith vs Syft
- Trivy vs WarpBuild
- Trivy vs Depot
- Trivy vs Namespace
- Trivy vs Earthly
- Trivy vs Nx Cloud
- Trivy vs OpsLevel
- Trivy vs Garden
- Trivy vs ConfigCat
- Trivy vs Dagger
- Trivy vs Nix
- Trivy vs Rust
- Trivy vs Ansible
- Trivy vs PartyKit
- Trivy vs PhpStorm
- Trivy vs Pieces for Developers
- Trivy vs RAD Studio
- Trivy vs Refact
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
