Developer Tools · head to head
Namespace vs Trivy

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Namespace covers Devboxes, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Namespace and Trivy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Trivy
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Trivy
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Trivy
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Namespace
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Namespace
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Namespace
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Namespace or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Namespace starts at Free and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Namespace or Trivy?
- Namespace starts at Free and Trivy at Free.
- Does Namespace or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Namespace for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Namespace best used for?
- Namespace is most often used for providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments, accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners, distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructure, scaling development velocity for monorepo organizations. Of those, providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments and accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Namespace do that Trivy cannot?
- Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Namespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceTrivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Namespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceTrivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Namespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceTrivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs ConfigCat
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs StackBlitz
- Namespace vs Steampipe
- Namespace vs Tilt
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
- Namespace vs Grype
- Namespace vs Snyk
- Namespace vs Chainguard
- Namespace vs Semgrep
- Namespace vs Bitwarden
- Namespace vs Infisical
- Namespace vs Authelia
- Namespace vs Ory Kratos
- Namespace vs HashiCorp Vault
- Namespace vs Arnica
- Namespace vs OWASP ZAP
- Namespace vs Proton Mail
- Namespace vs Veriff
- Namespace vs Brave Browser
- Namespace vs March Networks
- Namespace vs Salient CompleteView
- Namespace vs Sumsub
- Namespace vs Syft
- Trivy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Trivy vs CodeSandbox
- Trivy vs WarpBuild
- Trivy vs Depot
- Trivy vs Blacksmith
- Trivy vs Earthly
- Trivy vs Daytona
- Trivy vs Ansible
- Trivy vs Garden
- Trivy vs ConfigCat
- Trivy vs Nix
- Trivy vs OpsLevel
- Trivy vs StackBlitz
- Trivy vs Steampipe
- Trivy vs Tilt
- Trivy vs Webpack
- Trivy vs Avo
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
