Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs HashiCorp Boundary

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot HashiCorp Boundary
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot HashiCorp Boundary
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Blacksmith
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Blacksmith
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Blacksmith
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or HashiCorp Boundary?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs BeyondTrust
- Blacksmith vs Teleport
- Blacksmith vs Delinea
- Blacksmith vs Infisical
- Blacksmith vs 1Password
- Blacksmith vs LastPass
- Blacksmith vs authentik
- Blacksmith vs Logto
- Blacksmith vs Ory
- Blacksmith vs Saviynt
- Blacksmith vs Beyond Identity
- Blacksmith vs One Identity
- Blacksmith vs Keygen
- Blacksmith vs KnowBe4
- Blacksmith vs Legit Security
- Blacksmith vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Blacksmith vs Metasploit
- Blacksmith vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs WarpBuild
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Depot
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Namespace
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Earthly
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nx Cloud
- HashiCorp Boundary vs OpsLevel
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Garden
- HashiCorp Boundary vs ConfigCat
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Dagger
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nix
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Rust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ansible
- HashiCorp Boundary vs PartyKit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs PhpStorm
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Pieces for Developers
- HashiCorp Boundary vs RAD Studio
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Refact
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
