Databases · head to head
DataGrip vs EMQX

DataGrip
Databases
Cross-platform database IDE from JetBrains for SQL and NoSQL databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DataGrip commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.; EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- They diverge on capability: DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, EMQX covers Erlang clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrip and EMQX actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrip
- Intelligent SQL Completion
- Schema Navigation
- Data Editor
- Version Control for Scripts
- Multi-database Support
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrip
- Writing and running SQL queries across multiple database enginesnot EMQX
- Browsing and editing schema and table data visuallynot EMQX
- Version-controlling database migration scriptsnot EMQX
- Standardizing database tooling across a JetBrains-based teamnot EMQX
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot DataGrip
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot DataGrip
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot DataGrip
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot DataGrip
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrip
- Commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.
- No built-in database administration features like backup scheduling found in dedicated DBA tools.
- Heavier resource footprint than lightweight single-purpose SQL clients.
- NoSQL support (e.g. MongoDB) is less mature than its relational database tooling.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrip
Free- Free (non-commercial)Free
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- Individual - Year 1$99/year
- Full DataGrip license
- Free updates during subscription
- Individual - Year 2+$79/year
- Continuity discount from second year onward
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrip if
- You need intelligent sql completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux.
- You also want schema navigation.
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrip or EMQX better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrip starts at Free and EMQX at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrip or EMQX?
- DataGrip starts at Free and EMQX at Free.
- Does DataGrip or EMQX run on more platforms?
- DataGrip runs on windows, mac, linux. EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- Can I use DataGrip for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DataGrip best used for?
- DataGrip is most often used for writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines, browsing and editing schema and table data visually, version-controlling database migration scripts, standardizing database tooling across a jetbrains-based team. Of those, writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines and browsing and editing schema and table data visually are not what EMQX is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrip do that EMQX cannot?
- DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, Schema Navigation, Data Editor, Version Control for Scripts. EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrip: Is DataGrip free for personal use?
JetBrains introduced a free non-commercial license for DataGrip in October 2025, allowing personal use, while commercial use still requires a paid annual or monthly subscription.
SourceEMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
DataGrip: Who qualifies for the free non-commercial license?
Only individuals are eligible, for uses like learning, open-source work, or content creation. Anyone paid by an employer, including at a non-profit, must use a commercial license instead.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
DataGrip: How long does the free non-commercial license last?
It lasts one year and auto-renews if DataGrip was used at least once in the final six months; otherwise you can simply reapply for a new license.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
DataGrip: Does the free license have fewer features than the paid version?
No, it is a full-featured IDE identical to the paid version, though it requires anonymized telemetry sharing that cannot be opted out of under the non-commercial agreement.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
DataGrip: Can I use DataGrip offline with the free license?
No, activation requires logging into a JetBrains Account; offline activation codes are not available for the free non-commercial license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DataGrip vs RavenDB
- DataGrip vs Couchbase
- DataGrip vs DynamoDB
- DataGrip vs Oracle Database
- DataGrip vs Cassandra
- DataGrip vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DataGrip vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DataGrip vs IBM Db2
- DataGrip vs ScyllaDB
- DataGrip vs Cockroach Labs
- DataGrip vs PostgreSQL
- DataGrip vs Estuary
- DataGrip vs Firebolt
- DataGrip vs Google Cloud SQL
- DataGrip vs CouchDB
- DataGrip vs VerneMQ
- DataGrip vs RabbitMQ
- DataGrip vs NATS
- DataGrip vs Solace PubSub+
- DataGrip vs Canary Labs
- DataGrip vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- DataGrip vs TimescaleDB
- DataGrip vs Turso
- DataGrip vs Chroma
- DataGrip vs DuckDB
- DataGrip vs Teradata
- DataGrip vs Apache Kafka
- DataGrip vs Immuta
- DataGrip vs MariaDB
- DataGrip vs Materialize
- EMQX vs RavenDB
- EMQX vs Couchbase
- EMQX vs DynamoDB
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Cassandra
- EMQX vs Microsoft SQL Server
- EMQX vs Firebase Realtime Database
- EMQX vs IBM Db2
- EMQX vs ScyllaDB
- EMQX vs Cockroach Labs
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Estuary
- EMQX vs Firebolt
- EMQX vs Google Cloud SQL
- EMQX vs CouchDB
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
