Databases · head to head
DataGrip vs VerneMQ

DataGrip
Databases
Cross-platform database IDE from JetBrains for SQL and NoSQL databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DataGrip commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrip and VerneMQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrip
- Intelligent SQL Completion
- Schema Navigation
- Data Editor
- Version Control for Scripts
- Multi-database Support
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrip
- Writing and running SQL queries across multiple database enginesnot VerneMQ
- Browsing and editing schema and table data visuallynot VerneMQ
- Version-controlling database migration scriptsnot VerneMQ
- Standardizing database tooling across a JetBrains-based teamnot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot DataGrip
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot DataGrip
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot DataGrip
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot DataGrip
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrip
- Commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.
- No built-in database administration features like backup scheduling found in dedicated DBA tools.
- Heavier resource footprint than lightweight single-purpose SQL clients.
- NoSQL support (e.g. MongoDB) is less mature than its relational database tooling.
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrip
Free- Free (non-commercial)Free
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- Individual - Year 1$99/year
- Full DataGrip license
- Free updates during subscription
- Individual - Year 2+$79/year
- Continuity discount from second year onward
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrip if
- You need intelligent sql completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux.
- You also want schema navigation.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrip or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrip starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrip or VerneMQ?
- DataGrip starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does DataGrip or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- DataGrip runs on windows, mac, linux. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use DataGrip for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DataGrip best used for?
- DataGrip is most often used for writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines, browsing and editing schema and table data visually, version-controlling database migration scripts, standardizing database tooling across a jetbrains-based team. Of those, writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines and browsing and editing schema and table data visually are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrip do that VerneMQ cannot?
- DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, Schema Navigation, Data Editor, Version Control for Scripts. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrip: Is DataGrip free for personal use?
JetBrains introduced a free non-commercial license for DataGrip in October 2025, allowing personal use, while commercial use still requires a paid annual or monthly subscription.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
DataGrip: Who qualifies for the free non-commercial license?
Only individuals are eligible, for uses like learning, open-source work, or content creation. Anyone paid by an employer, including at a non-profit, must use a commercial license instead.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
DataGrip: How long does the free non-commercial license last?
It lasts one year and auto-renews if DataGrip was used at least once in the final six months; otherwise you can simply reapply for a new license.
SourceVerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
DataGrip: Does the free license have fewer features than the paid version?
No, it is a full-featured IDE identical to the paid version, though it requires anonymized telemetry sharing that cannot be opted out of under the non-commercial agreement.
SourceVerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
DataGrip: Can I use DataGrip offline with the free license?
No, activation requires logging into a JetBrains Account; offline activation codes are not available for the free non-commercial license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DataGrip vs RavenDB
- DataGrip vs Couchbase
- DataGrip vs DynamoDB
- DataGrip vs Oracle Database
- DataGrip vs Cassandra
- DataGrip vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DataGrip vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DataGrip vs IBM Db2
- DataGrip vs ScyllaDB
- DataGrip vs Cockroach Labs
- DataGrip vs PostgreSQL
- DataGrip vs Estuary
- DataGrip vs Firebolt
- DataGrip vs Google Cloud SQL
- DataGrip vs CouchDB
- DataGrip vs EMQX
- DataGrip vs RabbitMQ
- DataGrip vs NATS
- DataGrip vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- DataGrip vs Canary Labs
- DataGrip vs Solace PubSub+
- DataGrip vs TimescaleDB
- DataGrip vs Apache Pulsar
- DataGrip vs Presto
- DataGrip vs StarRocks
- DataGrip vs Timeplus
- DataGrip vs Chroma
- DataGrip vs Cloudinary
- DataGrip vs Convex
- DataGrip vs Dgraph
- DataGrip vs Dragonfly
- DataGrip vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs RavenDB
- VerneMQ vs Couchbase
- VerneMQ vs DynamoDB
- VerneMQ vs Oracle Database
- VerneMQ vs Cassandra
- VerneMQ vs Microsoft SQL Server
- VerneMQ vs Firebase Realtime Database
- VerneMQ vs IBM Db2
- VerneMQ vs ScyllaDB
- VerneMQ vs Cockroach Labs
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Estuary
- VerneMQ vs Firebolt
- VerneMQ vs Google Cloud SQL
- VerneMQ vs CouchDB
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio
