Databases · head to head
DataGrip vs Immuta

DataGrip
Databases
Cross-platform database IDE from JetBrains for SQL and NoSQL databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Immuta
Databases
Attribute-based access control and masking applied inside Snowflake, Databricks and BigQuery
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only DataGrip has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DataGrip commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.; Immuta contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.
- They diverge on capability: DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, Immuta covers Attribute-based policy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrip and Immuta actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrip
- Intelligent SQL Completion
- Schema Navigation
- Data Editor
- Version Control for Scripts
- Multi-database Support
Only in Immuta
- Attribute-based policy
- Native enforcement
- Dynamic masking
- Row-level filtering
- Purpose-based access
- Sensitive data tagging
- Audit logging
- Multi-platform
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrip
- Writing and running SQL queries across multiple database enginesnot Immuta
- Browsing and editing schema and table data visuallynot Immuta
- Version-controlling database migration scriptsnot Immuta
- Standardizing database tooling across a JetBrains-based teamnot Immuta
Immuta
- A bank whose Snowflake estate has grown to tens of thousands of roles that no one can review before an auditnot DataGrip
- A healthcare analytics team that must let researchers query patient data with identifiers masked unless a specific purpose is recordednot DataGrip
- A multinational applying different residency and access rules per jurisdiction to the same tables without duplicating datasetsnot DataGrip
- An organisation running both Snowflake and Databricks that wants one policy set rather than two divergent implementationsnot DataGrip
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrip
- Commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.
- No built-in database administration features like backup scheduling found in dedicated DBA tools.
- Heavier resource footprint than lightweight single-purpose SQL clients.
- NoSQL support (e.g. MongoDB) is less mature than its relational database tooling.
Immuta
- Contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.
- Policy is only as good as the data classification underneath it, so an organisation with poorly tagged columns will spend months on classification before Immuta enforces anything useful.
- Native enforcement means capability varies by platform, and a feature available on Snowflake may be absent or behave differently on BigQuery, which undermines the promise of one policy set everywhere.
- Adding an access governance layer creates a new dependency in the path to data: a misconfigured policy silently returns fewer rows rather than erroring, and analysts can act on incomplete results without noticing.
- It governs cloud data platforms, so personal data in operational databases, files and SaaS applications sits outside its scope and needs separate controls, meaning Immuta is rarely the whole answer.
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrip
Free- Free (non-commercial)Free
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- Individual - Year 1$99/year
- Full DataGrip license
- Free updates during subscription
- Individual - Year 2+$79/year
- Continuity discount from second year onward
Immuta
On request- Immuta Platform$undefined/year
- Attribute-based policy authoring
- Native enforcement in supported data platforms
- Dynamic masking and row-level security
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrip if
- You need intelligent sql completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux.
- You also want schema navigation.
Choose Immuta if
- You need attribute-based policy.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud.
- You also want native enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrip or Immuta better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrip starts at Free and Immuta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrip or Immuta?
- DataGrip has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DataGrip and On request for Immuta.
- Does DataGrip or Immuta run on more platforms?
- DataGrip runs on windows, mac, linux. Immuta runs on Web, API, Cloud.
- Can I use DataGrip for free?
- Yes. DataGrip has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Immuta starts at On request.
- What is DataGrip best used for?
- DataGrip is most often used for writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines, browsing and editing schema and table data visually, version-controlling database migration scripts, standardizing database tooling across a jetbrains-based team. Of those, writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines and browsing and editing schema and table data visually are not what Immuta is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrip do that Immuta cannot?
- DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, Schema Navigation, Data Editor, Version Control for Scripts. Immuta covers Attribute-based policy, Native enforcement, Dynamic masking, Row-level filtering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrip: Is DataGrip free for personal use?
JetBrains introduced a free non-commercial license for DataGrip in October 2025, allowing personal use, while commercial use still requires a paid annual or monthly subscription.
SourceImmuta: Does Immuta sit in the query path?
No. It compiles policies into the data platform's own native controls, so queries run at normal speed through your existing tools.
DataGrip: Who qualifies for the free non-commercial license?
Only individuals are eligible, for uses like learning, open-source work, or content creation. Anyone paid by an employer, including at a non-profit, must use a commercial license instead.
SourceImmuta: What does it cost?
Not published. Market data suggests roughly 100,000 to 200,000 US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and considerably more at enterprise scale.
DataGrip: How long does the free non-commercial license last?
It lasts one year and auto-renews if DataGrip was used at least once in the final six months; otherwise you can simply reapply for a new license.
SourceImmuta: Is Immuta still independent?
Yes. It remains independently owned, unlike several competitors in data access governance that have been acquired.
DataGrip: Does the free license have fewer features than the paid version?
No, it is a full-featured IDE identical to the paid version, though it requires anonymized telemetry sharing that cannot be opted out of under the non-commercial agreement.
SourceImmuta: Does it work across more than one warehouse?
Yes, one policy set can target Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery and Starburst, though enforcement capability varies by platform.
DataGrip: Can I use DataGrip offline with the free license?
No, activation requires logging into a JetBrains Account; offline activation codes are not available for the free non-commercial license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DataGrip vs RavenDB
- DataGrip vs Couchbase
- DataGrip vs DynamoDB
- DataGrip vs Oracle Database
- DataGrip vs Cassandra
- DataGrip vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DataGrip vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DataGrip vs IBM Db2
- DataGrip vs ScyllaDB
- DataGrip vs Cockroach Labs
- DataGrip vs PostgreSQL
- DataGrip vs Estuary
- DataGrip vs Firebolt
- DataGrip vs Google Cloud SQL
- DataGrip vs CouchDB
- DataGrip vs Privacera
- DataGrip vs BigQuery
- DataGrip vs Teradata
- DataGrip vs Dgraph
- DataGrip vs Knack
- DataGrip vs Elasticsearch
- DataGrip vs Apache Druid
- DataGrip vs DuckDB
- DataGrip vs CosmosDB
- DataGrip vs DataStax
- DataGrip vs dbt
- DataGrip vs EMQX
- DataGrip vs FaunaDB
- DataGrip vs Amazon Redshift
- Immuta vs RavenDB
- Immuta vs Couchbase
- Immuta vs DynamoDB
- Immuta vs Oracle Database
- Immuta vs Cassandra
- Immuta vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Immuta vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Immuta vs IBM Db2
- Immuta vs ScyllaDB
- Immuta vs Cockroach Labs
- Immuta vs PostgreSQL
- Immuta vs Estuary
- Immuta vs Firebolt
- Immuta vs Google Cloud SQL
- Immuta vs CouchDB
- Immuta vs Privacera
- Immuta vs BigQuery
- Immuta vs Teradata
- Immuta vs Dgraph
- Immuta vs Knack
- Immuta vs Elasticsearch
- Immuta vs Apache Druid
- Immuta vs DuckDB
- Immuta vs CosmosDB
- Immuta vs DataStax
- Immuta vs dbt
- Immuta vs EMQX
- Immuta vs FaunaDB
- Immuta vs Amazon Redshift
