Databases · head to head
EMQX vs Firebase Realtime Database

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Firebase Realtime Database
Databases
Store and sync data in real-time across all clients
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.; Firebase Realtime Database the no-cost Spark plan caps storage at 1 GB, downloads at 10 GB per month and simultaneous connections at 100
- They diverge on capability: EMQX covers Erlang clustering, Firebase Realtime Database covers Real-time Sync.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EMQX and Firebase Realtime Database actually diverge.
| Attribute | EMQX | Firebase Realtime Database |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by connection and session volume | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
Only in Firebase Realtime Database
- Real-time Sync
- Offline Support
- JSON Storage
- Security Rules
- Data Validation
- Multi-platform SDKs
- Scalable
- Firebase Auth
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot Firebase Realtime Database
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot Firebase Realtime Database
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot Firebase Realtime Database
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot Firebase Realtime Database
Firebase Realtime Database
- Syncing JSON application state between clients in real timenot EMQX
- Backing mobile and web apps with offline capable data storagenot EMQX
- Prototyping realtime features such as presence and chatnot EMQX
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Firebase Realtime Database
- The no-cost Spark plan caps storage at 1 GB, downloads at 10 GB per month and simultaneous connections at 100
- The Spark plan does not support multiple databases in a project
- Even on the paid Blaze plan simultaneous connections are capped at 200,000 per database
- Billing is by data transferred out at $1 per GB plus $5 per GB stored, so chatty clients cost more than the data volume suggests
Pricing, plan by plan
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Firebase Realtime Database
Free- SparkFree
- 1 GB data storage included
- 10 GB per month data downloads included
- No charges for usage within limits
- Blaze$5/per_GB_per_month
- Maintains Spark free allowances
- Pay-as-you-go for usage exceeding limits
- Billing applies to data stored and outbound network traffic
Which should you pick?
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Choose Firebase Realtime Database if
- You need real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want offline support.
Questions people ask
- Is EMQX or Firebase Realtime Database better?
- Neither clearly leads. EMQX starts at Free and Firebase Realtime Database at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EMQX or Firebase Realtime Database?
- EMQX starts at Free and Firebase Realtime Database at Free.
- Does EMQX or Firebase Realtime Database run on more platforms?
- EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS. Firebase Realtime Database runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use EMQX for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is EMQX best used for?
- EMQX is most often used for a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks, an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service, an iot product team that has outgrown a single mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptions, a smart building deployment mixing mqtt, coap and lwm2m devices on one broker. Of those, a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks and an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service are not what Firebase Realtime Database is typically brought in for.
- What can EMQX do that Firebase Realtime Database cannot?
- EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks. Firebase Realtime Database covers Real-time Sync, Offline Support, JSON Storage, Security Rules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
Firebase Realtime Database: How much does Firebase Realtime Database cost?
Firebase Realtime Database offers a free Spark plan (1 GB storage, 10 GB/month downloads) and a pay-as-you-go Blaze plan. On Blaze, storage costs $5 per GB per month, evaluated daily, with no monthly minimum charges.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
Firebase Realtime Database: What is included in Firebase Realtime Database free tier?
The Spark plan includes 1 GB of data storage and 10 GB per month of data downloads at no cost. Usage within these limits incurs no charges, making it suitable for small projects and testing.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
Firebase Realtime Database: Does Firebase Realtime Database charge for denied or rejected operations?
Yes. Firebase charges for all traffic to and from the database on the Blaze plan, including operations denied by security rules, outbound network traffic at the session layer, and connection and encryption overhead from all operations.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Firebase Realtime Database: Can I set a spending limit on Firebase Realtime Database?
Firebase offers budget alerts but does not cap spending automatically. Users must monitor their usage dashboard in the Firebase console to track connections, storage, downloads, and load metrics; a calculator is available for cost estimation.
SourceRelated pages
More on Firebase Realtime Database
Other head to heads
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Cassandra
- EMQX vs Airtable
- EMQX vs Cockroach Labs
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Amazon Aurora
- EMQX vs Estuary
- EMQX vs ScyllaDB
- EMQX vs ClickHouse
- EMQX vs dbt
- EMQX vs FaunaDB
- EMQX vs Memcached
- EMQX vs MotherDuck
- EMQX vs Neo4j
- EMQX vs CouchDB
- EMQX vs Apache Druid
- EMQX vs Apache Pinot
- Firebase Realtime Database vs VerneMQ
- Firebase Realtime Database vs RabbitMQ
- Firebase Realtime Database vs NATS
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Solace PubSub+
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Canary Labs
- Firebase Realtime Database vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Firebase Realtime Database vs TimescaleDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Turso
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Chroma
- Firebase Realtime Database vs DuckDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Teradata
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Kafka
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Immuta
- Firebase Realtime Database vs MariaDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Materialize
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Oracle Database
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Cassandra
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Airtable
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Cockroach Labs
- Firebase Realtime Database vs PostgreSQL
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Amazon Aurora
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Estuary
- Firebase Realtime Database vs ScyllaDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs ClickHouse
- Firebase Realtime Database vs dbt
- Firebase Realtime Database vs FaunaDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Memcached
- Firebase Realtime Database vs MotherDuck
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Neo4j
- Firebase Realtime Database vs CouchDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Druid
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Pinot
