Software · head to head
Amazon RDS vs Neo4j

Amazon RDS
Software
Set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Neo4j has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon RDS no super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon RDS and Neo4j actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon RDS | Neo4j |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon RDS
- Multiple DB Engines
- Automated Backups
- Multi-AZ Deployment
- Read Replicas
- Encryption
- Performance Insights
- Automatic Scaling
- MySQL
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon RDS
- Transaction processingnot Neo4j
- Data storagenot Neo4j
- Application backendnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Data analyticsnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Running a managed graph database on AWS, Azure or Google Cloudnot Amazon RDS
- Building knowledge graphs and GraphRAG retrieval for AI applicationsnot Amazon RDS
- Fraud detection, recommendations and supply chain analysis over connected datanot Amazon RDS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon RDS
- No super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization
- Pricing unpredictable and expensive compared to GCP alternatives with equivalent features
- Limited access to system procedures and tables requiring advanced permissions
- No Oracle RAC (Real Application Clusters) support for high-availability Oracle deployments
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon RDS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Amazon RDS review.
Neo4j
Free- CommunityFree
- Single database
- Cypher queries
- APOC library
- AuraDB FreeFree
- 50K nodes
- 175K relationships
- Cloud hosted
- AuraDB Professional$65/month
- Dedicated instance
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon RDS if
- You need multiple db engines.
- You work on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon RDS or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon RDS starts at On request and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon RDS or Neo4j?
- Neo4j has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Amazon RDS and Free for Neo4j.
- Does Amazon RDS or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Amazon RDS runs on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Yes. Neo4j has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Amazon RDS starts at On request.
- What is Amazon RDS best used for?
- Amazon RDS is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon RDS do that Neo4j cannot?
- Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, Automated Backups, Multi-AZ Deployment, Read Replicas. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon RDS: What databases does Amazon RDS support?
Amazon RDS supports Amazon Aurora, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle Database, and Microsoft SQL Server as managed database engines.
SourceAmazon RDS: Does Amazon RDS handle backups automatically?
Yes. Amazon RDS automates backup configuration, backing up your database and transaction logs. Blue/Green Deployments allow safer updates by mirroring production in staging before applying changes.
SourceAmazon RDS: How does Amazon RDS Proxy improve performance?
Amazon RDS Proxy is a managed database proxy that makes applications more scalable by reducing database connection overhead, more resilient to database failures, and more secure through built-in authentication.
SourceAmazon RDS: Does Amazon RDS provide read replicas?
Yes. Amazon RDS supports read replicas across availability zones and regions, enabling horizontal scaling of read capacity while maintaining a single write primary.
SourceAmazon RDS: Can I access the host directly via SSH or Remote Desktop?
No. Amazon RDS does not allow direct host access via SSH, Telnet, or Windows Remote Desktop Connection. Database access is limited to database clients and management console.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon RDS vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon RDS vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon RDS vs Airtable
- Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon RDS vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon RDS vs PlanetScale
- Amazon RDS vs Azure SQL
- Amazon RDS vs ClickHouse
- Amazon RDS vs Couchbase
- Amazon RDS vs DuckDB
- Amazon RDS vs DynamoDB
- Amazon RDS vs MariaDB
- Amazon RDS vs Oracle Database
- Amazon RDS vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon RDS vs Apache Druid
- Amazon RDS vs Cassandra
- Amazon RDS vs CouchDB
- Amazon RDS vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs PlanetScale
- Neo4j vs Azure SQL
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs MariaDB
- Neo4j vs Oracle Database
- Neo4j vs Amazon Redshift
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Firebolt

