Databases · head to head
Amazon RDS vs Neo4j

Amazon RDS
Databases
Set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon RDS no super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization; Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- They diverge on capability: Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon RDS and Neo4j actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon RDS | Neo4j |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon RDS
- Multiple DB Engines
- Automated Backups
- Multi-AZ Deployment
- Read Replicas
- Encryption
- Performance Insights
- Automatic Scaling
- MySQL
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon RDS
- Transaction processingnot Neo4j
- Data storagenot Neo4j
- Application backendnot Neo4j
- Reportingnot Neo4j
- Data analyticsnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Amazon RDS
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Amazon RDS
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Amazon RDS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon RDS
- No super-user access or direct host connectivity limits advanced customization
- Pricing unpredictable and expensive compared to GCP alternatives with equivalent features
- Limited access to system procedures and tables requiring advanced permissions
- No Oracle RAC (Real Application Clusters) support for high-availability Oracle deployments
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon RDS
Free- On-Demand Instances$undefined/per second
- Reserved Instances$undefined/mo
- Database Savings Plans$undefined/mo
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon RDS if
- You need multiple db engines.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon RDS or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon RDS starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon RDS or Neo4j?
- Amazon RDS starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Amazon RDS or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Amazon RDS runs on AWS Cloud, Multi-AZ, Multi-region. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Amazon RDS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon RDS best used for?
- Amazon RDS is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon RDS do that Neo4j cannot?
- Amazon RDS covers Multiple DB Engines, Automated Backups, Multi-AZ Deployment, Read Replicas. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon RDS: What is included in the AWS Free Tier for RDS?
For signups before July 15, 2025: 750 hours per month of single-AZ database instance usage (12 months), 20 GB General Purpose SSD storage monthly, 20 GB automated backup storage monthly, available engines include MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, SQL Server Express Edition. For signups after July 15, 2025: choice between Free Plan or Paid Plan, $100 in credits plus up to $100 additional credits for activating foundational services, credits valid 12 months. Free Tier unavailable in AWS GovCloud (US) and China (Beijing) regions.
SourceNeo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceAmazon RDS: How is data transfer priced in RDS?
Same Availability Zone (EC2 to RDS) is free. Multi-AZ replication is free. Cross-AZ within same region is 0.01 USD per GB in and out. Cross-region snapshots and backups follow standard data transfer charges.
SourceNeo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceAmazon RDS: What database engines are supported by RDS?
Aurora, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle, SQL Server, and IBM Db2. Pricing varies by engine.
SourceNeo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceAmazon RDS: What cost components are included in RDS monthly pricing?
DB instance hours (billed in 1-second increments, 10-minute minimum), storage per GB per month, I/O requests (Aurora and magnetic storage only), provisioned IOPS per month, backup storage, and data transfer fees.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon RDS vs Azure SQL
- Amazon RDS vs Aiven
- Amazon RDS vs FaunaDB
- Amazon RDS vs Firebolt
- Amazon RDS vs DataStax
- Amazon RDS vs SingleStore
- Amazon RDS vs Nile
- Amazon RDS vs Zilliz
- Amazon RDS vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon RDS vs ScyllaDB
- Amazon RDS vs Solace PubSub+
- Amazon RDS vs SQLite
- Amazon RDS vs StarRocks
- Amazon RDS vs SurrealDB
- Amazon RDS vs Teradata
- Amazon RDS vs BigQuery
- Amazon RDS vs CosmosDB
- Amazon RDS vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon RDS vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon RDS vs Airtable
- Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon RDS vs ArangoDB
- Amazon RDS vs Dgraph
- Amazon RDS vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Amazon RDS vs Couchbase
- Amazon RDS vs Cassandra
- Amazon RDS vs Valkey
- Amazon RDS vs Canary Labs
- Amazon RDS vs Chroma
- Amazon RDS vs DynamoDB
- Amazon RDS vs CouchDB
- Amazon RDS vs Apache Doris
- Amazon RDS vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Google Cloud SQL
- Neo4j vs Azure SQL
- Neo4j vs Aiven
- Neo4j vs FaunaDB
- Neo4j vs Firebolt
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs SingleStore
- Neo4j vs Nile
- Neo4j vs Zilliz
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Solace PubSub+
- Neo4j vs SQLite
- Neo4j vs StarRocks
- Neo4j vs SurrealDB
- Neo4j vs Teradata
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr

