Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Wireshark
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Wireshark
Cybersecurity
The world's foremost network protocol analyzer
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Wireshark free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Wireshark actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Wireshark does not also cover.
Only in Wireshark
- Deep packet inspection
- Live capture
- Offline analysis
- 3000+ protocol support
- Rich display filters
- VoIP analysis
- Decryption support
- Scripting with Lua
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Wireshark
- Network Securitynot Fig
- Packet Analysisnot Fig
- Open Sourcenot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Wireshark
- Free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Wireshark
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Deep inspection
- Live capture
Which should you pick?
Choose Wireshark if
- You need deep packet inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want live capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Wireshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Wireshark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Wireshark?
- Fig starts at Free and Wireshark at Free.
- Does Fig or Wireshark run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Wireshark runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Wireshark cannot?
- Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection, Live capture, Offline analysis, 3000+ protocol support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wireshark: Is there a cost to download and use Wireshark?
No, Wireshark is completely free. It's distributed under the GNU General Public License version 2, making it "free software" with no demo limitations. The full version is available at no cost.
SourceWireshark: What support options are available for Wireshark users?
Wireshark offers multiple support channels including mailing lists, an active Discord community, the Ask Wireshark Q&A platform, comprehensive documentation, a user guide, and developer resources for those needing technical assistance.
SourceWireshark: Are there different pricing tiers or subscription levels?
Wireshark does not offer pricing tiers or subscriptions. There is one free version available to all users regardless of use case, personal, professional, or organizational.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Fig vs Norton 360
- Fig vs LastPass
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs OWASP ZAP
- Fig vs Syft
- Fig vs Metasploit
- Fig vs Cosign
- Fig vs HashiCorp Vault
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Fenergo
- Fig vs Google Authenticator
- Fig vs Hanwha Vision
- Fig vs Idira
- Fig vs IVPN
- Fig vs Grype
- Wireshark vs Visual Studio Code
- Wireshark vs ESLint
- Wireshark vs Turborepo
- Wireshark vs pnpm
- Wireshark vs Sweep
- Wireshark vs Cody
- Wireshark vs Warp
- Wireshark vs Keycloak
- Wireshark vs Rust
- Wireshark vs CodeSandbox
- Wireshark vs Vite
- Wireshark vs Daytona
- Wireshark vs Visual Studio
- Wireshark vs Xlinesoft
- Wireshark vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Wireshark vs Sourcegraph
- Wireshark vs 1Password
- Wireshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Wireshark vs Norton 360
- Wireshark vs LastPass
- Wireshark vs Bitwarden
- Wireshark vs OWASP ZAP
- Wireshark vs Syft
- Wireshark vs Metasploit
- Wireshark vs Cosign
- Wireshark vs HashiCorp Vault
- Wireshark vs Infisical
- Wireshark vs Semgrep
- Wireshark vs Fenergo
- Wireshark vs Google Authenticator
- Wireshark vs Hanwha Vision
- Wireshark vs Idira
- Wireshark vs IVPN
- Wireshark vs Grype
