Maps · head to head
Correlator3D vs Quartix

Correlator3D
Maps
SimActive photogrammetry with a published price list and a perpetual licence still on sale
- From
- $295/month
- Free plan
- No

Quartix
Fleet Management
Deliberately narrow vehicle tracking from a listed UK vendor that publishes its prices
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Correlator3D the standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.; Quartix video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- They diverge on capability: Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, Quartix covers Live tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Correlator3D and Quartix actually diverge.
| Attribute | Correlator3D | Quartix |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $295/month | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Per vehicle per month |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Correlator3D
- Aerial triangulation
- DSM and DTM generation
- Orthomosaic production
- Point cloud and 3D mesh output
- Feature extraction
- GPU acceleration
- Satellite imagery support
- Batch and unattended processing
Only in Quartix
- Live tracking
- Driving style scoring
- Timesheet reporting
- Geofences
- Driver identification
- Published pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Correlator3D
- An aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licencenot Quartix
- A national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagerynot Quartix
- A drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughputnot Quartix
- An organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rulesnot Quartix
Quartix
- A UK or French van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitmentnot Correlator3D
- A finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotesnot Correlator3D
- An operator disputing employee hours or customer claims about arrival times who needs a defensible site attendance recordnot Correlator3D
- A small fleet whose insurer offers a discount for driving style monitoring but who does not need cameras or compliance toolingnot Correlator3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Correlator3D
- The standard licence caps at 61 megapixel sensors, so an operator moving to a medium or large format camera has to buy a different and separately quoted licence rather than paying an upgrade fee.
- It is Windows desktop only with no cloud processing option, so throughput is bounded by the workstation and GPU you buy, and there is no way to burst capacity for one large job.
- There is no collaboration layer, client portal or field application, so deliverable sharing, review and version control all have to be handled by other software.
- The interface and workflow are built for photogrammetry specialists; an occasional drone operator will find the learning curve steeper than a consumer-oriented mapping package.
- The perpetual licence includes only one year of support and updates, and staying current afterwards means paying maintenance, so the headline $5,900 is not the whole long-term cost.
Quartix
- Video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- There is no maintenance, work order or parts management, so servicing schedules stay in whatever spreadsheet or garage system the fleet already runs.
- US hours of service and wider DOT compliance are not the focus, which rules Quartix out for regulated interstate commercial operations.
- The standard tracker is hardwired rather than a plug-in device, so installation means booking vehicles in, which adds cost and downtime that no-contract plug-in competitors avoid.
- The API and integration list are short, so feeding tracking data into payroll, job costing or an ERP tends to mean scheduled exports rather than a supported connector.
Pricing, plan by plan
Correlator3D
$295/month- Monthly subscription$295/month
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Yearly subscription$2950/year
- Unlimited images
- Sensors up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent licence$5900/one-time
- Perpetual licence
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- All modules and tools
- Permanent floating licence$6400/one-time
- Perpetual floating licence shared across machines
- Unlimited images up to 61 megapixels
- One year of support and updates included
Quartix
On request- Quartix$undefined/month
- List pricing published openly, with rates varying by contract length
- Tracking hardware included in the subscription rather than bought separately
- One-year terms available alongside longer discounted options
Which should you pick?
Choose Correlator3D if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want dsm and dtm generation.
Choose Quartix if
- You need live tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want driving style scoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Correlator3D or Quartix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Correlator3D starts at $295/month and Quartix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Correlator3D or Quartix?
- Correlator3D starts at $295/month and Quartix at On request.
- Does Correlator3D or Quartix run on more platforms?
- Correlator3D runs on Windows. Quartix runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Correlator3D best used for?
- Correlator3D is most often used for an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence, a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery, a drone service provider producing bare-earth terrain models for volumetrics and corridor mapping at high throughput, an organisation that wants a perpetual licence because a multi-year subscription cannot be justified against its capital budgeting rules. Of those, an aerial survey company processing large photographic blocks where per-project cloud credits would be more expensive than owning a licence and a national or regional mapping agency that needs software it can run offline on classified or restricted imagery are not what Quartix is typically brought in for.
- What can Correlator3D do that Quartix cannot?
- Correlator3D covers Aerial triangulation, DSM and DTM generation, Orthomosaic production, Point cloud and 3D mesh output. Quartix covers Live tracking, Driving style scoring, Timesheet reporting, Geofences.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Correlator3D: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. $5,900 for a permanent licence and $6,400 for a permanent floating licence, each including a year of support and updates.
Quartix: Why is Quartix cheaper than the big platforms?
Because it does less. There is no camera ecosystem, no compliance suite and no marketplace to fund. If you only need tracking, you are not subsidising features you will not use.
Correlator3D: What limits the standard licence?
Sensor resolution, up to 61 megapixels. Medium format, large format and satellite imagery need separately priced licences.
Quartix: Do I have to sign for three years?
No. Shorter terms are offered, priced higher per month than the longer options. The rates are published, so the trade-off is visible before you talk to anyone.
Correlator3D: Is there a cloud version?
No. Processing runs on your own Windows workstation. SimActive offers a data processing service as an alternative to buying the software.
Quartix: Is the hardware mine?
The tracking unit is supplied as part of the subscription rather than sold to you. Check the return and replacement terms if you plan to leave or dispose of vehicles.
Correlator3D: Does it handle satellite imagery?
Yes, under a separate satellite licence class quoted on request.
Related pages
More on Correlator3D
Other head to heads
- Correlator3D vs QGIS
- Correlator3D vs Agisoft Metashape
- Correlator3D vs Emlid Studio
- Correlator3D vs Cesium ion
- Correlator3D vs Global Mapper
- Correlator3D vs Atlas.co
- Correlator3D vs Leica Infinity
- Correlator3D vs Bing Maps
- Correlator3D vs Gaia GPS
- Correlator3D vs Fused
- Correlator3D vs CesiumJS
- Correlator3D vs Mappedin
- Correlator3D vs Navmii GPS
- Correlator3D vs Nominatim
- Correlator3D vs OpenLayers
- Correlator3D vs OpenRouteService
- Correlator3D vs OpenStreetMap
- Correlator3D vs OsmAnd
- Correlator3D vs Geotab
- Correlator3D vs Verizon Connect
- Correlator3D vs Azuga
- Correlator3D vs CalAmp
- Correlator3D vs GPS Trackit
- Correlator3D vs NexTraq
- Correlator3D vs Motive
- Correlator3D vs Lytx
- Correlator3D vs Whip Around
- Correlator3D vs Zonar Systems
- Correlator3D vs Samsara
- Correlator3D vs Omnitracs
- Correlator3D vs Ridecell
- Correlator3D vs Uptake
- Correlator3D vs Webfleet
- Quartix vs QGIS
- Quartix vs Agisoft Metashape
- Quartix vs Emlid Studio
- Quartix vs Cesium ion
- Quartix vs Global Mapper
- Quartix vs Atlas.co
- Quartix vs Leica Infinity
- Quartix vs Bing Maps
- Quartix vs Gaia GPS
- Quartix vs Fused
- Quartix vs CesiumJS
- Quartix vs Mappedin
- Quartix vs Navmii GPS
- Quartix vs Nominatim
- Quartix vs OpenLayers
- Quartix vs OpenRouteService
- Quartix vs OpenStreetMap
- Quartix vs OsmAnd
- Quartix vs Geotab
- Quartix vs Verizon Connect
- Quartix vs Azuga
- Quartix vs CalAmp
- Quartix vs GPS Trackit
- Quartix vs NexTraq
- Quartix vs Motive
- Quartix vs Lytx
- Quartix vs Whip Around
- Quartix vs Zonar Systems
- Quartix vs Samsara
- Quartix vs Omnitracs
- Quartix vs Ridecell
- Quartix vs Uptake
- Quartix vs Webfleet
