APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Tuum

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tuum
APIs
Modular core banking platform from Estonia, formerly branded Modularbank
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convoy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Tuum it is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Tuum covers Modular product structure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Tuum actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Tuum
- Modular product structure
- Low-code integration middleware
- Cloud-agnostic deployment
- Multi-currency real-time accounts
- Cards and lending modules
- Faster migration timeline
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Tuum
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Tuum
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Tuum
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Tuum
Tuum
- A bank wanting to migrate specific banking products to the cloud within months rather than replacing its entire core at oncenot Convoy
- A fintech in the DACH region or Middle East wanting a European core banking vendor with regional expansion focusnot Convoy
- An institution wanting low-code middleware to connect new modules to an existing legacy core rather than a full rebuildnot Convoy
- A company researching "Modularbank" that needs to confirm it is the same company now branded Tuumnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Tuum
- It is a smaller, younger company than Mambu, so it has fewer live reference deployments and a shorter track record to evaluate risk against.
- The 2022-era rebrand from Modularbank to Tuum means older funding records, case studies and press coverage appear under a different name, complicating due diligence for anyone unaware of the change.
- Pricing is entirely unpublished, requiring a sales conversation to budget against competing composable core vendors.
- Its geographic expansion into DACH and the Middle East is comparatively recent, so support depth and local regulatory expertise in those markets are less proven than in its home Baltic and Nordic base.
- As with any core banking platform, choosing Tuum is a multi-year infrastructure commitment; switching cores after implementation is a major undertaking regardless of how modular the initial adoption was.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Tuum
On request- Tuum$undefined/year
- Subscription and module-based pricing, not published
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Tuum if
- You need modular product structure.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want low-code integration middleware.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Tuum better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Tuum at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Tuum?
- Convoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convoy and On request for Tuum.
- Does Convoy or Tuum run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Tuum runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Yes. Convoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tuum starts at On request.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Tuum is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Tuum cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Tuum covers Modular product structure, Low-code integration middleware, Cloud-agnostic deployment, Multi-currency real-time accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Tuum: Is Tuum the same company as Modularbank?
Yes, Modularbank rebranded to Tuum; it is the same company and platform.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Tuum: Where is it strongest geographically?
Its base is Estonia and the Nordic and Baltic region, with newer expansion into DACH and the Middle East.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Tuum: Is pricing published?
No, subscription and module pricing require a sales conversation.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Mambu
- Convoy vs Vodeno
- Convoy vs Fintech Farm
- Convoy vs Skaleet
- Convoy vs Weavr
- Convoy vs Temenos Transact
- Convoy vs 10x Banking
- Convoy vs Unit
- Convoy vs Griffin
- Convoy vs Swan
- Convoy vs i2c
- Convoy vs Solaris
- Convoy vs Volt
- Convoy vs WSO2 API Manager
- Convoy vs Zimpler
- Convoy vs 3scale
- Convoy vs Aiia
- Tuum vs Kong
- Tuum vs Svix
- Tuum vs Tyk
- Tuum vs Janus Gateway
- Tuum vs Appwrite
- Tuum vs Gravitee
- Tuum vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Tuum vs Formance
- Tuum vs AWS API Gateway
- Tuum vs Hasura
- Tuum vs PocketBase
- Tuum vs Sensedia
- Tuum vs Sila
- Tuum vs Swagger
- Tuum vs TIBCO Mashery
- Tuum vs Zeplo
- Tuum vs Kong Gateway
- Tuum vs Mambu
- Tuum vs Vodeno
- Tuum vs Fintech Farm
- Tuum vs Skaleet
- Tuum vs Weavr
- Tuum vs Temenos Transact
- Tuum vs 10x Banking
- Tuum vs Unit
- Tuum vs Griffin
- Tuum vs Swan
- Tuum vs i2c
- Tuum vs Solaris
- Tuum vs Volt
- Tuum vs WSO2 API Manager
- Tuum vs Zimpler
- Tuum vs 3scale
- Tuum vs Aiia
