Databases · head to head
Convex vs Valkey
Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Valkey younger project, so its track record is short even though the codebase is not
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Valkey covers Redis-compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Valkey actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Valkey
- Redis-compatible
- BSD licensed
- Rich data structures
- Replication and persistence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Valkey
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Valkey
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Valkey
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Valkey
Valkey
- Continuing on a permissively licensed in-memory store after the Redis licence changenot Convex
- Caching and session storage where a foundation-governed project is a procurement requirementnot Convex
- Migrating from Redis without rewriting application codenot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Valkey
- Younger project, so its track record is short even though the codebase is not
- Divergence from Redis grows over time, so compatibility is strongest near the fork point and weakens as both evolve
- Ecosystem tooling and documentation still frequently assume Redis, leaving translation work
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Valkey
Free- ValkeyFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Valkey if
- You need redis-compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want bsd licensed.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Valkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Valkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Valkey?
- Convex starts at Free and Valkey at Free.
- Does Convex or Valkey run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Valkey runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Valkey is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Valkey cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Valkey covers Redis-compatible, BSD licensed, Rich data structures, Replication and persistence.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Valkey: Is Valkey free?
Yes, BSD-licensed open source under the Linux Foundation.
Convex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Valkey: Why does Valkey exist?
Redis changed its licence away from BSD in 2024. Valkey is the community fork continuing under permissive terms, backed by AWS, Google Cloud and Oracle among others.
Convex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Valkey: Can I switch from Redis to Valkey?
At the fork point it is drop-in compatible with existing clients and data. The further both projects move from that point, the more you should verify the specific features you use.
Convex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Dragonfly
- Convex vs Memcached
- Convex vs MariaDB
- Convex vs Aiven
- Convex vs Redpanda
- Convex vs Timeplus
- Convex vs Apache Kafka
- Convex vs RabbitMQ
- Convex vs Meilisearch
- Convex vs NATS
- Convex vs DataGrip
- Convex vs Estuary
- Convex vs Apache Airflow
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Apache Pulsar
- Convex vs Cassandra
- Convex vs CouchDB
- Valkey vs PostgreSQL
- Valkey vs Airtable
- Valkey vs Cockroach Labs
- Valkey vs Amazon Aurora
- Valkey vs Readyset
- Valkey vs FaunaDB
- Valkey vs LanceDB
- Valkey vs Xata
- Valkey vs Materialize
- Valkey vs BigQuery
- Valkey vs dbt
- Valkey vs Apache Doris
- Valkey vs ArangoDB
- Valkey vs Canary Labs
- Valkey vs Chroma
- Valkey vs Cloudinary
- Valkey vs DynamoDB
- Valkey vs Apache Solr
- Valkey vs Dragonfly
- Valkey vs Memcached
- Valkey vs MariaDB
- Valkey vs Aiven
- Valkey vs Redpanda
- Valkey vs Timeplus
- Valkey vs Apache Kafka
- Valkey vs RabbitMQ
- Valkey vs Meilisearch
- Valkey vs NATS
- Valkey vs DataGrip
- Valkey vs Estuary
- Valkey vs Apache Airflow
- Valkey vs Apache Pinot
- Valkey vs Apache Pulsar
- Valkey vs Cassandra
- Valkey vs CouchDB