Databases · head to head
Cassandra vs Convex

Cassandra
Databases
Manage massive amounts of data with linear scalability
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cassandra no support for joins across tables; Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- They diverge on capability: Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Convex covers Reactive queries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cassandra and Convex actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cassandra
- Linear Scalability
- Fault Tolerance
- Multi-datacenter Replication
- Tunable Consistency
- CQL Query Language
- Distributed Architecture
- No Single Point of Failure
- DataStax
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cassandra
- Real-time applicationsnot Convex
- Content managementnot Convex
- User profilesnot Convex
- Mobile backendsnot Convex
- Cachingnot Convex
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Cassandra
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Cassandra
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Cassandra
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Cassandra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cassandra
- No support for joins across tables
- No ACID transactions across multiple rows
- Data model must be designed around query patterns upfront, making schema evolution difficult
- Partition key misconfigurations can cause uneven data distribution and hotspots that degrade performance
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cassandra
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cassandra review.
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Cassandra if
- You need linear scalability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want fault tolerance.
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Questions people ask
- Is Cassandra or Convex better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cassandra starts at Free and Convex at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cassandra or Convex?
- Cassandra starts at Free and Convex at Free.
- Does Cassandra or Convex run on more platforms?
- Cassandra runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Convex runs on Web.
- Can I use Cassandra for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cassandra best used for?
- Cassandra is most often used for real-time applications, content management, user profiles, mobile backends. Of those, real-time applications and content management are not what Convex is typically brought in for.
- What can Cassandra do that Convex cannot?
- Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Fault Tolerance, Multi-datacenter Replication, Tunable Consistency. Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cassandra: Does Cassandra support joins between tables?
No. Cassandra does not support joins or foreign keys. The data model requires denormalization, meaning data must be duplicated across tables to support different query patterns.
SourceConvex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Cassandra: Does Cassandra offer ACID transactions?
No. Cassandra provides only row-level atomicity and isolation, not full ACID transactions across multiple rows or tables. It uses lightweight transactions via Paxos for per-row compare-and-set operations.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Cassandra: What programming languages can connect to Cassandra?
Cassandra supports official drivers for multiple languages including Python, Java, Node.js, and Go, allowing applications to communicate via the native Cassandra protocol.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Cassandra: Can I deploy Cassandra in the cloud?
Yes. Cassandra can run on any cloud platform (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) via Docker, virtual machines, or managed services like DataStax Astra DB, which provides a fully managed DBaaS option.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Cassandra: Does Cassandra have a free option?
The open source Apache Cassandra is free. DataStax also offers Astra DB with a free tier providing up to 25GB storage and 25 million read/write operations per month.
SourceConvex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cassandra vs Couchbase
- Cassandra vs Elasticsearch
- Cassandra vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Cassandra vs YugabyteDB
- Cassandra vs DynamoDB
- Cassandra vs ClickHouse
- Cassandra vs ScyllaDB
- Cassandra vs Dgraph
- Cassandra vs RavenDB
- Cassandra vs DataGrip
- Cassandra vs Cockroach Labs
- Cassandra vs Neo4j
- Cassandra vs EMQX
- Cassandra vs FaunaDB
- Cassandra vs Memcached
- Cassandra vs MotherDuck
- Cassandra vs Firestore
- Cassandra vs PostgreSQL
- Cassandra vs Airtable
- Cassandra vs Amazon Aurora
- Cassandra vs Readyset
- Cassandra vs LanceDB
- Cassandra vs Xata
- Cassandra vs Materialize
- Cassandra vs BigQuery
- Cassandra vs dbt
- Cassandra vs Apache Doris
- Cassandra vs ArangoDB
- Cassandra vs Canary Labs
- Cassandra vs Chroma
- Cassandra vs Cloudinary
- Cassandra vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Couchbase
- Convex vs Elasticsearch
- Convex vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Convex vs YugabyteDB
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs ScyllaDB
- Convex vs Dgraph
- Convex vs RavenDB
- Convex vs DataGrip
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Neo4j
- Convex vs EMQX
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs Memcached
- Convex vs MotherDuck
- Convex vs Firestore
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs Apache Solr
