Databases · head to head
FaunaDB vs Valkey

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.; Valkey younger project, so its track record is short even though the codebase is not
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, Valkey covers Redis-compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Valkey actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
Only in Valkey
- Redis-compatible
- BSD licensed
- Rich data structures
- Replication and persistence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot Valkey
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot Valkey
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not Valkey
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot Valkey
Valkey
- Continuing on a permissively licensed in-memory store after the Redis licence changenot FaunaDB
- Caching and session storage where a foundation-governed project is a procurement requirementnot FaunaDB
- Migrating from Redis without rewriting application codenot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Valkey
- Younger project, so its track record is short even though the codebase is not
- Divergence from Redis grows over time, so compatibility is strongest near the fork point and weakens as both evolve
- Ecosystem tooling and documentation still frequently assume Redis, leaving translation work
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Valkey
Free- ValkeyFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Choose Valkey if
- You need redis-compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want bsd licensed.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Valkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Valkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Valkey?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Valkey at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Valkey run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Valkey runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded, extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api, studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under apache 2.0, forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has jvm and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controls. Of those, keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded and extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api are not what Valkey is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Valkey cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access. Valkey covers Redis-compatible, BSD licensed, Rich data structures, Replication and persistence.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
Valkey: Is Valkey free?
Yes, BSD-licensed open source under the Linux Foundation.
FaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
Valkey: Why does Valkey exist?
Redis changed its licence away from BSD in 2024. Valkey is the community fork continuing under permissive terms, backed by AWS, Google Cloud and Oracle among others.
FaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
Valkey: Can I switch from Redis to Valkey?
At the fork point it is drop-in compatible with existing clients and data. The further both projects move from that point, the more you should verify the specific features you use.
FaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
FaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Dragonfly
- FaunaDB vs Memcached
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Aiven
- FaunaDB vs Redpanda
- FaunaDB vs Timeplus
- FaunaDB vs Apache Kafka
- FaunaDB vs RabbitMQ
- FaunaDB vs Meilisearch
- FaunaDB vs NATS
- FaunaDB vs DataGrip
- FaunaDB vs Estuary
- FaunaDB vs Apache Airflow
- Valkey vs Amazon Aurora
- Valkey vs PostgreSQL
- Valkey vs Airtable
- Valkey vs Cockroach Labs
- Valkey vs BigQuery
- Valkey vs CouchDB
- Valkey vs CosmosDB
- Valkey vs ArangoDB
- Valkey vs Dgraph
- Valkey vs DynamoDB
- Valkey vs Google Cloud SQL
- Valkey vs Apache Pinot
- Valkey vs Amazon RDS
- Valkey vs Apache Pulsar
- Valkey vs Cassandra
- Valkey vs Amazon Redshift
- Valkey vs Dragonfly
- Valkey vs Memcached
- Valkey vs MariaDB
- Valkey vs Aiven
- Valkey vs Redpanda
- Valkey vs Timeplus
- Valkey vs Apache Kafka
- Valkey vs RabbitMQ
- Valkey vs Meilisearch
- Valkey vs NATS
- Valkey vs DataGrip
- Valkey vs Estuary
- Valkey vs Apache Airflow

