Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs Convex

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Convex covers Reactive queries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and Convex actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Web |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Convex
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Convex
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Convex
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Convex
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Apache Pinot
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Apache Pinot
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Apache Pinot
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or Convex better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and Convex at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or Convex?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and Convex at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or Convex run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Convex runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what Convex is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that Convex cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceConvex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Apache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Apache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Apache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs Readyset
- Apache Pinot vs FaunaDB
- Apache Pinot vs LanceDB
- Apache Pinot vs Xata
- Apache Pinot vs BigQuery
- Apache Pinot vs dbt
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Doris
- Apache Pinot vs ArangoDB
- Apache Pinot vs Canary Labs
- Apache Pinot vs Chroma
- Apache Pinot vs Cloudinary
- Apache Pinot vs DynamoDB
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs Tinybird
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs SingleStore
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs Firebolt
- Convex vs Estuary
- Convex vs TimescaleDB
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs DataGrip
- Convex vs Google Cloud SQL
- Convex vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Convex vs QuestDB
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
