Databases · head to head
Apache Airflow vs Convex

Apache Airflow
Databases
Programmatically author, schedule and monitor data workflows in Python
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Airflow self-hosting is genuinely heavy: scheduler, metadata database, workers and executor choice are a standing operational job; Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- They diverge on capability: Apache Airflow covers Pipelines as Python, Convex covers Reactive queries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Airflow and Convex actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Airflow | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed services billed separately | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Airflow
- Pipelines as Python
- Web UI
- Cloud provider packages
- Jinja templating
- Retries and dependencies
- Extensible operators
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Airflow
- Scheduling nightly ETL where step order and retries matternot Convex
- Coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runsnot Convex
- Orchestrating dbt runs alongside extraction and loadingnot Convex
- Replacing a sprawl of cron jobs with dependencies and visible run historynot Convex
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Apache Airflow
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Apache Airflow
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Apache Airflow
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Apache Airflow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Airflow
- Self-hosting is genuinely heavy: scheduler, metadata database, workers and executor choice are a standing operational job
- Built for scheduled batch work, and a poor fit for event-driven or sub-minute latency pipelines
- Because DAGs are Python that the scheduler parses continuously, expensive top-level code in a DAG file slows the whole scheduler
- Local development and testing of DAGs is awkward compared with newer orchestrators designed with it in mind
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Airflow
Free- Apache AirflowFree
- Full scheduler and web UI
- All provider packages
- No task or DAG limits
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Airflow if
- You need pipelines as python.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want web ui.
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Airflow or Convex better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Airflow starts at Free and Convex at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Airflow or Convex?
- Apache Airflow starts at Free and Convex at Free.
- Does Apache Airflow or Convex run on more platforms?
- Apache Airflow runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Convex runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache Airflow for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Airflow best used for?
- Apache Airflow is most often used for scheduling nightly etl where step order and retries matter, coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runs, orchestrating dbt runs alongside extraction and loading, replacing a sprawl of cron jobs with dependencies and visible run history. Of those, scheduling nightly etl where step order and retries matter and coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runs are not what Convex is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Airflow do that Convex cannot?
- Apache Airflow covers Pipelines as Python, Web UI, Cloud provider packages, Jinja templating. Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Airflow: Is Apache Airflow free?
Yes. Airflow is open source under the Apache Software Foundation with no licence fee. Costs are the infrastructure to run it, or a managed service such as Google Cloud Composer or Amazon MWAA.
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Apache Airflow: What language are Airflow workflows written in?
Python. A workflow is a Python file, so standard language features including loops and datetime handling can generate tasks dynamically, with no XML or command-line configuration.
Convex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Apache Airflow: Is Airflow suitable for real-time pipelines?
Not really. Airflow is designed for scheduled batch orchestration. Event-driven or sub-minute work is better served by a streaming platform such as Kafka or a purpose-built streaming engine.
Convex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Apache Airflow: What are the main alternatives to Airflow?
Dagster and Prefect are the two most commonly weighed against it, both newer and both designed around the local development and testing experience Airflow is criticised for.
Convex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
More on Apache Airflow
Other head to heads
- Apache Airflow vs dbt
- Apache Airflow vs Redpanda
- Apache Airflow vs Meilisearch
- Apache Airflow vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Airflow vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Airflow vs NATS
- Apache Airflow vs DuckDB
- Apache Airflow vs MariaDB
- Apache Airflow vs QuestDB
- Apache Airflow vs Aiven
- Apache Airflow vs Memcached
- Apache Airflow vs OpenSearch
- Apache Airflow vs Knack
- Apache Airflow vs LanceDB
- Apache Airflow vs Marqo
- Apache Airflow vs Nile
- Apache Airflow vs Ninox
- Apache Airflow vs Presto
- Apache Airflow vs Airtable
- Apache Airflow vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Airflow vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Airflow vs Readyset
- Apache Airflow vs FaunaDB
- Apache Airflow vs Xata
- Apache Airflow vs Materialize
- Apache Airflow vs BigQuery
- Apache Airflow vs Apache Doris
- Apache Airflow vs ArangoDB
- Apache Airflow vs Canary Labs
- Apache Airflow vs Chroma
- Apache Airflow vs Cloudinary
- Apache Airflow vs DynamoDB
- Apache Airflow vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Redpanda
- Convex vs Meilisearch
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs RabbitMQ
- Convex vs NATS
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs MariaDB
- Convex vs QuestDB
- Convex vs Aiven
- Convex vs Memcached
- Convex vs OpenSearch
- Convex vs Knack
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Marqo
- Convex vs Nile
- Convex vs Ninox
- Convex vs Presto
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
