Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs DynamoDB

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

DynamoDB
Databases
AWS-only managed key-value and document database with fixed per-partition throughput limits and no ad hoc queries.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Free plans on both; paid from $110/mo and $0.625/mo.
- Only ConfigCat lists feature flags and configuration; only DynamoDB lists managed and serverless.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and DynamoDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for ConfigCat.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in DynamoDB
- Managed and serverless
- Predictable latency
- On-demand or provisioned capacity
- Global secondary indexes
- Transactions
- DynamoDB Streams
- Global tables
- Point-in-time recovery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot DynamoDB
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot DynamoDB
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot DynamoDB
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot DynamoDB
DynamoDB
- High-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and knownnot ConfigCat
- Traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercisenot ConfigCat
- Serverless applications on Lambda, where an HTTP-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases havenot ConfigCat
- Event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifiernot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch
DynamoDB
- Access patterns must be designed into the key schema before launch; a query nobody anticipated needs a new global secondary index, which is a full extra copy of the projected attributes billed as storage and as writes, or an offline migration
- Global secondary indexes are eventually consistent and cannot be read strongly, so a read-after-write against an index can legitimately miss the item that was just written, and application code must be written to tolerate that
- Per-partition throughput is capped at roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units, so a hot key throttles even when the table has spare capacity overall, and the only real fix is changing the key design to spread the load
- Items are limited to 400 KB and query results paginate at 1 MB, so large or list-shaped data has to be split, offloaded to S3 with a pointer, or read through pagination loops that complicate every consumer
- It runs only on AWS and the API is proprietary rather than a standard, so moving the data layer means rewriting it; ScyllaDB's Alternator is the only meaningfully compatible target and it brings a much smaller ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/mo
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/mo
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/mo
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
DynamoDB
Free- On-Demand CapacityOn request
- Pay-per-request pricing with automatic scaling
- Read: 0.5 RRU per 4 KB (eventually consistent), 1 RRU per 4 KB (strongly consistent), 2 RRU per 4 KB (transactional)
- Write: 1 WRU per 1 KB
- Provisioned CapacityOn request
- Fixed hourly charges based on reserved capacity
- RCU rate: $0.00013 per hour (Standard)
- WCU rate: $0.00065 per hour (Standard)
- Standard Table Class Storage$0.25/per gb/month
- $0.25 per GB/month after free tier
- First 25 GB free per month (free tier)
- Standard-Infrequent Access Table Class$0.1/per gb/month
- $0.10 per GB/month
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need managed and serverless.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want predictable latency.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or DynamoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and DynamoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or DynamoDB?
- ConfigCat starts at Free and DynamoDB at Free.
- Does ConfigCat or DynamoDB run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Windows. DynamoDB runs on AWS.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what DynamoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that DynamoDB cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. DynamoDB covers Managed and serverless, Predictable latency, On-demand or provisioned capacity, Global secondary indexes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
DynamoDB: On-demand or provisioned capacity?
On-demand suits unpredictable or spiky traffic and removes capacity planning. Provisioned with autoscaling is considerably cheaper for steady high-volume workloads. Tables can be switched between them, though not arbitrarily often.
ConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
DynamoDB: Can I run DynamoDB outside AWS?
No. DynamoDB Local exists for development and testing only. For a production-compatible alternative elsewhere, ScyllaDB's Alternator implements the DynamoDB API, but it is a different system with a different ecosystem.
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
DynamoDB: Can I run ad hoc queries or analytics?
Not on the table itself. Scans are slow and expensive at scale. The usual pattern is to export to S3 or stream changes out and query them in Athena, Redshift or another analytical engine.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
DynamoDB: Is single-table design necessary?
It is the pattern that gets the most from DynamoDB when access patterns are well known, because it lets related items be retrieved in one query. It also makes the model harder to evolve, so many teams reasonably choose multiple simpler tables and accept extra requests.
DynamoDB: What are the real limits I should design around?
400 KB per item, 1 MB per query or scan page, 100 items per transaction, roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units per partition, and eventual consistency on global secondary indexes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs LaunchDarkly
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Docker
- ConfigCat vs Kubernetes
- ConfigCat vs Terraform
- ConfigCat vs GitLab
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Prettier
- ConfigCat vs Rust
- ConfigCat vs StackBlitz
- ConfigCat vs Steampipe
- ConfigCat vs Vim
- ConfigCat vs Tilt
- ConfigCat vs MongoDB
- ConfigCat vs Elasticsearch
- ConfigCat vs Cassandra
- ConfigCat vs BigQuery
- ConfigCat vs FaunaDB
- ConfigCat vs Memcached
- ConfigCat vs ScyllaDB
- ConfigCat vs PlanetScale
- ConfigCat vs Couchbase
- ConfigCat vs DataGrip
- ConfigCat vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ConfigCat vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ConfigCat vs QuestDB
- ConfigCat vs Vitess
- ConfigCat vs Aiven
- ConfigCat vs CouchDB
- ConfigCat vs Google Cloud SQL
- ConfigCat vs CosmosDB
- DynamoDB vs LaunchDarkly
- DynamoDB vs Nix
- DynamoDB vs Depot
- DynamoDB vs Blacksmith
- DynamoDB vs WarpBuild
- DynamoDB vs Namespace
- DynamoDB vs OpsLevel
- DynamoDB vs Docker
- DynamoDB vs Kubernetes
- DynamoDB vs Terraform
- DynamoDB vs GitLab
- DynamoDB vs Earthly
- DynamoDB vs Prettier
- DynamoDB vs Rust
- DynamoDB vs StackBlitz
- DynamoDB vs Steampipe
- DynamoDB vs Vim
- DynamoDB vs Tilt
- DynamoDB vs MongoDB
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs BigQuery
- DynamoDB vs FaunaDB
- DynamoDB vs Memcached
- DynamoDB vs ScyllaDB
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DataGrip
- DynamoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DynamoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DynamoDB vs QuestDB
- DynamoDB vs Vitess
- DynamoDB vs Aiven
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- DynamoDB vs CosmosDB
