Research · head to head
Condens vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS

Condens
Research
UX research repository for storing, tagging and sharing qualitative study findings
- From
- €15/month
- Rated
- -

Thermo SampleManager LIMS
Research
Enterprise LIMS for regulated QC laboratories, with LES and SDMS in one product
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Condens the gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.; Thermo SampleManager LIMS no pricing is published in any form, and Thermo Fisher routes even basic cost questions through a request for quote, so early stage budget planning is guesswork.
- They diverge on capability: Condens covers Automatic transcription, Thermo SampleManager LIMS covers Sample lifecycle management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Condens and Thermo SampleManager LIMS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Condens | Thermo SampleManager LIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €15/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per contributor per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Condens
- Automatic transcription
- Highlight and tag
- Theme clustering
- Insight pages
- Participant profiles
- Search across studies
- Viewer seats
- Video clip reels
Only in Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Sample lifecycle management
- Specifications and OOS handling
- Laboratory execution system
- Scientific data management
- Stability studies
- Instrument management
- Environmental monitoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Condens
- A solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a monthnot Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- A European enterprise research team that needs GDPR-oriented data handling to clear internal procurementnot Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- A team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports itnot Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- A researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one placenot Thermo SampleManager LIMS
Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- A pharmaceutical QC laboratory that needs enforced method execution and electronic signatures for GMP release testingnot Condens
- A multi site chemical or petrochemical business standardising sample handling and specifications across laboratoriesnot Condens
- A water or environmental testing laboratory with high sample throughput and regulatory reporting obligationsnot Condens
- A laboratory replacing a LIMS plus separate LES and SDMS estate and wanting to retire two integrations along with the old systemnot Condens
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Condens
- The gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.
- Lite includes no viewer seats at all, which defeats the main purpose of a repository: anyone outside the research team who wants to read a finding has to be paid for as a contributor or sent a static export.
- Cross-project participant profiles are capped at 25 on Lite, so a solo researcher doing longitudinal work with a recurring panel outgrows the entry tier on that limit rather than on seats.
- As a bootstrapped fifteen-person company it ships AI synthesis, automatic theme extraction and moderated-interview features more slowly than venture-funded rivals, so teams that want the repository to do the analysis rather than organise it will find it behind.
- It is a repository, not a research platform: recruitment, panel management, unmoderated testing and survey fielding all live elsewhere, so it adds a subscription rather than consolidating one.
Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- No pricing is published in any form, and Thermo Fisher routes even basic cost questions through a request for quote, so early stage budget planning is guesswork.
- Implementation is configuration heavy and normally requires Thermo Fisher professional services or a specialist partner, and services costs routinely exceed the licence cost in the first year.
- Computer system validation is the customer responsibility on top of implementation, so a GMP laboratory carries a validation programme of its own before go live and repeats a subset of it at every upgrade.
- Cloud hosting is charged as an annual fee scaled to licence count, so seats drive infrastructure cost as well as licence cost and occasional users are expensive twice.
- The product carries a long codebase history and its configuration model is specialist, which makes in house administrators hard to recruit and creates a dependency on external consultants for changes that would be self service in a newer LIMS.
Pricing, plan by plan
Condens
€15/month- Lite$15/month
- 1 contributor included, additional contributors 15 euros each
- No viewer seats
- Unlimited projects, transcription hours and storage
- Business$500/month
- 5 contributors included, additional contributors 85 euros each
- Unlimited viewers
- Unlimited participant profiles and folders
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Minimum 5 contributors
- Custom contributor rates
- Unlimited viewers
Thermo SampleManager LIMS
On request- SampleManager LIMS$undefined/year
- Quoted through the Thermo Fisher sales team, nothing published
- Annual hosting fee calculated on the number of licences for cloud deployments
- Deployment as Thermo managed AWS, on premise, or customer cloud
Which should you pick?
Choose Thermo SampleManager LIMS if
- You need sample lifecycle management.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
- You also want specifications and oos handling.
Questions people ask
- Is Condens or Thermo SampleManager LIMS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Condens starts at €15/month and Thermo SampleManager LIMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Condens or Thermo SampleManager LIMS?
- Condens starts at €15/month and Thermo SampleManager LIMS at On request.
- Does Condens or Thermo SampleManager LIMS run on more platforms?
- Condens runs on Web. Thermo SampleManager LIMS runs on Web, Windows, Linux.
- What is Condens best used for?
- Condens is most often used for a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month, a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement, a team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports it, a researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one place. Of those, a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month and a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement are not what Thermo SampleManager LIMS is typically brought in for.
- What can Condens do that Thermo SampleManager LIMS cannot?
- Condens covers Automatic transcription, Highlight and tag, Theme clustering, Insight pages. Thermo SampleManager LIMS covers Sample lifecycle management, Specifications and OOS handling, Laboratory execution system, Scientific data management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Condens: Is there a free plan?
No, only a 15-day trial on any tier with no card required.
Thermo SampleManager LIMS: Does SampleManager include LES and SDMS?
Yes. Laboratory execution and scientific data management are part of the product rather than separate purchases, which removes two integration projects.
Condens: Can stakeholders read findings without a licence?
Only on Business and above, where viewer seats are unlimited. Lite has none.
Thermo SampleManager LIMS: How much does it cost?
Nothing is published. Pricing is quoted, and cloud deployments carry an annual hosting fee based on licence count.
Condens: Is transcription metered?
No. Transcription hours, storage and project count are unlimited on every plan; participant profiles and folders are what the tiers restrict.
Thermo SampleManager LIMS: Is it validated when I buy it?
Thermo Fisher supplies qualification documentation, but computer system validation of your configured instance remains your responsibility.
Condens: Where is data hosted?
Condens is a German company with an explicitly GDPR-oriented setup, which is a common reason European enterprises shortlist it.
Thermo SampleManager LIMS: Can I run it on premise?
Yes. Thermo managed AWS, on premise and customer cloud deployments are all offered.
Related pages
More on Thermo SampleManager LIMS
Other head to heads
- Condens vs Dovetail
- Condens vs Aurelius
- Condens vs Marvin
- Condens vs Reduct
- Condens vs NVivo
- Condens vs Castor EDC
- Condens vs DNAnexus
- Condens vs Medidata Rave
- Condens vs Paperpile
- Condens vs Remesh
- Condens vs Scispot
- Condens vs Suzy
- Condens vs Valispace
- Condens vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Condens vs Zappi
- Condens vs Zotero
- Condens vs Elicit
- Condens vs Mendeley
- Condens vs LabWare
- Condens vs STARLIMS
- Condens vs Sapio Sciences
- Condens vs LabVantage
- Condens vs Labguru
- Condens vs Genedata
- Condens vs Schrodinger
- Condens vs TetraScience
- Condens vs Benchling
- Condens vs Form Bio
- Condens vs Greenphire
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Dovetail
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Aurelius
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Marvin
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Reduct
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs NVivo
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Castor EDC
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs DNAnexus
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Medidata Rave
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Paperpile
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Remesh
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Scispot
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Suzy
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Valispace
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Zappi
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Zotero
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Elicit
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Mendeley
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs LabWare
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs STARLIMS
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Sapio Sciences
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs LabVantage
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Labguru
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Genedata
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Schrodinger
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs TetraScience
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Benchling
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Form Bio
- Thermo SampleManager LIMS vs Greenphire
