Is Bullhorn or Comeet better?

Neither clearly leads. Bullhorn starts at On request and Comeet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Bullhorn or Comeet?

Bullhorn starts at On request and Comeet at On request.

Does Bullhorn or Comeet run on more platforms?

Bullhorn runs on Web, iOS, Android. Comeet runs on Web.

What is Bullhorn best used for?

Bullhorn is most often used for a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record, a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day, an agency consolidating several acquired offices onto one system of record, an executive search practice needing assignment-based workflow rather than requisition-based tracking. Of those, a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record and a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day are not what Comeet is typically brought in for.

What can Bullhorn do that Comeet cannot?

Bullhorn covers Recruitment CRM, Applicant tracking, Pay and bill, Bullhorn Automation. Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps, Elastic workflows, Sourcing, Scorecards.

Recruitment · head to head

Bullhorn vs Comeet

Bullhorn

Recruitment

Applicant tracking and CRM for staffing and recruitment agencies, including contract placement, timesheets and pay-bill

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Comeet

Recruitment

Structured collaborative hiring where every stage is assigned to a named person, now part of Spark Hire

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Bullhorn pricing is per user on annual contracts with minimum seat counts, so agencies with seasonal consultants pay for licences that sit idle for months.; Comeet the assigned-step model assumes disciplined process ownership, and in companies that hire opportunistically recruiters bypass it, which leaves the reporting describing a process nobody follows.
They diverge on capability: Bullhorn covers Recruitment CRM, Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bullhorn and Comeet actually diverge.

Attributes where Bullhorn and Comeet differ
Attribute	Bullhorn	Comeet
Platforms	Web, iOS, Android	Web

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bullhorn

Recruitment CRM
Applicant tracking
Pay and bill
Bullhorn Automation
Analytics
Onboarding
Executive search
Salesforce edition

Only in Comeet

Assigned hiring steps
Elastic workflows
Sourcing
Scorecards
Scheduling
Careers site
Offer management
Reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bullhorn

A contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement recordnot Comeet
A recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working daynot Comeet
An agency consolidating several acquired offices onto one system of recordnot Comeet
An executive search practice needing assignment-based workflow rather than requisition-based trackingnot Comeet

Comeet

A company where hiring consistently stalls on manager review and nobody can say whose turn it isnot Bullhorn
A technology firm running structured interview loops with several interviewers per candidatenot Bullhorn
An organisation that wants to measure which stage and which person creates the bottlenecknot Bullhorn
A team that already uses Spark Hire video interviewing and wants it inside the hiring processnot Bullhorn

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bullhorn

Pricing is per user on annual contracts with minimum seat counts, so agencies with seasonal consultants pay for licences that sit idle for months.
The product estate has been assembled through a decade of acquisitions, which leaves overlapping modules, inconsistent interfaces and more than one supported way to do the same task.
Implementation and data migration are multi-month projects requiring paid services, and agencies moving from another system routinely underestimate the effort of cleaning candidate and client records first.
The interface is dated relative to newer recruitment tools, and consultants coming from consumer-grade software need real training rather than picking it up unaided.
It is built for agency economics and is a poor fit for corporate in-house hiring, where the client and margin concepts are meaningless and the licence cost buys capability that will never be used.

Comeet

The assigned-step model assumes disciplined process ownership, and in companies that hire opportunistically recruiters bypass it, which leaves the reporting describing a process nobody follows.
Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with company size and hiring volume, so it cannot be compared against per seat or per job slot competitors without going through a sales cycle.
Sourcing and candidate relationship management are thinner than dedicated tools, so passive outreach still happens in LinkedIn and is recorded after the fact.
The 2023 acquisition by Spark Hire places an independent ATS inside a portfolio company, and buyers should ask for explicit standalone roadmap commitments before signing a multi-year term.
Support and product hours have historically followed Israeli and US eastern time, which leaves European and Asia Pacific customers with narrow overlap for anything urgent.

Pricing, plan by plan

Bullhorn

On request

Bullhorn ATS and CRM$undefined/year
- Priced per user per month on an annual contract
- Minimum user counts apply
- Implementation and data migration quoted separately

Comeet

On request

Comeet$undefined/year
- Quoted by company size and hiring volume rather than published per seat
- Unlimited users on standard terms
- Elastic workflow engine and scorecards

Which should you pick?

Choose Bullhorn if

You need recruitment crm.
You work on Web, iOS, Android.
You also want applicant tracking.

Bullhorn review

Choose Comeet if

You need assigned hiring steps.
You also want elastic workflows.

Comeet review

Questions people ask

Is Bullhorn or Comeet better?: Neither clearly leads. Bullhorn starts at On request and Comeet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bullhorn or Comeet?: Bullhorn starts at On request and Comeet at On request.
Does Bullhorn or Comeet run on more platforms?: Bullhorn runs on Web, iOS, Android. Comeet runs on Web.
What is Bullhorn best used for?: Bullhorn is most often used for a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record, a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day, an agency consolidating several acquired offices onto one system of record, an executive search practice needing assignment-based workflow rather than requisition-based tracking. Of those, a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record and a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day are not what Comeet is typically brought in for.
What can Bullhorn do that Comeet cannot?: Bullhorn covers Recruitment CRM, Applicant tracking, Pay and bill, Bullhorn Automation. Comeet covers Assigned hiring steps, Elastic workflows, Sourcing, Scorecards.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Bullhorn: Is Bullhorn suitable for in-house corporate recruiting?

No. It is built around client relationships, margins and placements. Corporate teams should buy a requisition-based ATS instead.

Comeet: What is elastic recruiting?

Each step of a hiring process is assigned to a named person with a defined action and deadline, and the system tracks completion rather than leaving candidates in an unowned queue.

Bullhorn: Who owns Bullhorn?

Insight Partners has held a majority stake since 2012, and the company has grown substantially through acquisition since then.

Comeet: Who owns Comeet?

Spark Hire acquired it in 2023 and sells it alongside video interviewing and assessment products.

Bullhorn: Does it handle temporary worker payroll?

It captures time, calculates pay and bill rates and produces payroll and invoicing outputs. Actual payroll processing is done by a payroll provider it exports to.

Comeet: How is it priced?

By quote, based on company size and hiring volume, with unlimited users rather than per recruiter seats.

Bullhorn: What does implementation involve?

Data migration, workflow configuration and training, typically several months for an established agency, with services charged on top of the licence.

Comeet: Is it a good fit for low-volume hiring?

Not especially. The structure pays off when several people are involved in every hire and process delay is the real problem.

Bullhorn vs Comeet

Bullhorn

Comeet

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Bullhorn

Only in Comeet

What people use each for

Bullhorn

Comeet

Where each one falls short

Bullhorn

Comeet

Pricing, plan by plan

Bullhorn

Comeet

Which should you pick?

Choose Bullhorn if

Choose Comeet if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Bullhorn

More on Comeet

Keep looking

Other head to heads