Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Refact

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Refact does not also cover.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Refact
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Refact
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Refact
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Cody
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Cody
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Cody
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Refact?
- Cody starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Cody or Refact run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Refact cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cody vs ConfigCat
- Cody vs Cortex
- Cody vs Dagger
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Swagger UI
- Cody vs Coder
- Cody vs Pieces for Developers
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs GNU Emacs
- Cody vs Moonrepo
- Cody vs Pants Build
- Cody vs Atlantis
- Cody vs Backstage
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cody vs HCP Terraform
- Cody vs Helm
- Cody vs Jitsu
- Cody vs Notepad++
- Refact vs Turborepo
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs ESLint
- Refact vs pnpm
- Refact vs Sourcegraph
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Bazel
- Refact vs Fig
- Refact vs GoLand
- Refact vs Warp
- Refact vs Claude Code
- Refact vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Refact vs ConfigCat
- Refact vs Cortex
- Refact vs Dagger
- Refact vs Deno
- Refact vs PhpStorm
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++

