Developer Tools · head to head
Refact vs Sourcegraph

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Refact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Refact requires configuration for optimal performance; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Refact and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Refact | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Freemium with paid tiers | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | VS Code, Web | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2023 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Refact does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Sourcegraph
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Sourcegraph
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Sourcegraph
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Refact
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Refact
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Refact
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Refact
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Refact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Refact or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Refact starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Refact or Sourcegraph?
- Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Refact and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Refact or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Refact runs on VS Code, Web. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Refact best used for?
- Refact is most often used for autonomous code generation for development tasks, end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring, multi-language software development acceleration, enterprise development with data privacy requirements. Of those, autonomous code generation for development tasks and end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Refact do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++
- Refact vs ESLint
- Refact vs pnpm
- Refact vs Turborepo
- Refact vs Cody
- Refact vs Bazel
- Refact vs Nixpacks
- Refact vs Rust
- Refact vs Nix
- Refact vs Octopus Deploy
- Refact vs Okteto
- Refact vs OpsLevel
- Refact vs PartyKit
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Swagger UI
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Coder
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs CodeSandbox
- Sourcegraph vs GNU Emacs
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Pants Build
- Sourcegraph vs Atlantis
- Sourcegraph vs Backstage
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sourcegraph vs HCP Terraform
- Sourcegraph vs Helm
- Sourcegraph vs Jitsu
- Sourcegraph vs Notepad++
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Nix
- Sourcegraph vs Octopus Deploy
- Sourcegraph vs Okteto
- Sourcegraph vs OpsLevel
- Sourcegraph vs PartyKit
