Softwr

Mobile Development · head to head

Codemagic vs Maestro

Codemagic logo

Codemagic

Mobile Development

CI/CD built for Flutter and mobile apps

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Maestro logo

Maestro

Mobile Development

Open source mobile UI testing with YAML flows, and a cloud priced per concurrent device rather than per test minute

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Codemagic minute-based pricing opacity: exact costs for concurrent builds become difficult to predict at scale without calculator; Maestro cloud pricing is per concurrent device at 250 USD per month, so the cost is driven by how quickly you need the suite to finish rather than by how much you test, and a team wanting a fast pull request gate buys several devices at once.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Codemagic and Maestro actually diverge.

Attributes where Codemagic and Maestro differ
AttributeCodemagicMaestro
Pricing modelusage-based|subscriptionPer concurrent cloud device per month
PlatformsWebiOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mobile Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Codemagic

Nothing recorded that Maestro does not also cover.

Only in Maestro

  • YAML test flows
  • Built-in flakiness tolerance
  • Maestro Studio
  • Open source CLI
  • Cloud device runs
  • CI and pull request integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Codemagic

  • Mobile CI/CD pipelines for iOS and Androidnot Maestro
  • React Native CodePush over-the-air update distributionnot Maestro
  • Enterprise multi-team CI/CD at scalenot Maestro

Maestro

  • A mobile team replacing an Appium suite that spends more engineering time on maintenance than on new coveragenot Codemagic
  • Running smoke tests on every pull request without buying and maintaining a physical device labnot Codemagic
  • Letting a QA specialist who does not write application code author and own the end-to-end suitenot Codemagic
  • Reproducing a reported bug by recording the exact flow in Studio and committing it as a regression testnot Codemagic

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Codemagic

  • Minute-based pricing opacity: exact costs for concurrent builds become difficult to predict at scale without calculator
  • Free tier severely limited to 500 minutes/month with single parallel build vs. competitors offering more generous free allocations
  • M1/M2/M4 pricing variance creates complexity; customers must right-size machine type upfront without clear performance guidance
  • Additional concurrency is expensive at $49/month per concurrent build, potentially costing $588/year per extra slot

Maestro

  • Cloud pricing is per concurrent device at 250 USD per month, so the cost is driven by how quickly you need the suite to finish rather than by how much you test, and a team wanting a fast pull request gate buys several devices at once.
  • YAML is deliberately limited, so tests with real conditional logic or data-driven permutations end up in embedded scripting blocks where the readability advantage that justified the format disappears.
  • Maestro drives the app as a black box, so it cannot assert on internal state, mock a network layer from inside the process or inspect application memory the way an in-process framework can.
  • The hosted device catalogue is narrower than dedicated device clouds, so testing against a long tail of specific manufacturer builds and older operating system versions still requires another provider.
  • The project rebranded from mobile.dev to Maestro, so a share of existing tutorials, blog posts and links point at old domains and documentation that no longer match the current tooling.

Pricing, plan by plan

Codemagic

Free
  • Pay as You Go$undefined/mo
  • M2 Fixed Plan$3990/year
  • M4 Fixed Plan$5400/year
  • M4 Max Fixed Plan$9000/year

Maestro

Free
  • LocalFree
    • Free and open source CLI
    • Maestro Studio, Viewer and MCP
    • Runs on your own simulators, emulators and devices
  • Cloud$250/month
    • Per device per month
    • Unlimited hosted test runs
    • Hosted Android, iOS and web devices
  • Enterprise Cloud$undefined/year
    • Quoted
    • SSO and dedicated support
    • Custom contracts

Which should you pick?

Choose Codemagic if

  • You want to start without paying.
Codemagic review

Choose Maestro if

  • You need yaml test flows.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows.
  • You also want built-in flakiness tolerance.
Maestro review

Questions people ask

Is Codemagic or Maestro better?
Neither clearly leads. Codemagic starts at Free and Maestro at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Codemagic or Maestro?
Codemagic starts at Free and Maestro at Free.
Does Codemagic or Maestro run on more platforms?
Codemagic runs on Web. Maestro runs on iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows.
Can I use Codemagic for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Codemagic best used for?
Codemagic is most often used for mobile ci/cd pipelines for ios and android, react native codepush over-the-air update distribution, enterprise multi-team ci/cd at scale. Of those, mobile ci/cd pipelines for ios and android and react native codepush over-the-air update distribution are not what Maestro is typically brought in for.
What can Codemagic do that Maestro cannot?
Maestro covers YAML test flows, Built-in flakiness tolerance, Maestro Studio, Open source CLI.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Codemagic: How much does it cost to add more parallel builds?

Each additional concurrent build costs $49/month ($588/year). Fixed-plan customers can purchase additional concurrency at $1,500–$3,000/year depending on tier.

Source
Maestro: Is Maestro free?

The CLI, Studio and local execution are free and open source. The hosted device cloud is 250 USD per device per month.

Codemagic: Does Codemagic offer a free tier?

Yes. The free tier includes 500 free M2 build minutes monthly with 1 parallel build maximum, then paid usage kicks in.

Source
Maestro: What exactly does per device mean?

It is a concurrency slot. One device runs one test at a time, so suite duration is a function of how many devices you buy.

Codemagic: What is the difference between monthly billing and annual fixed plans?

Pay-as-you-go charges per minute of build time. Fixed annual plans provide unlimited minutes on a specific machine type (M2, M4, or M4 Max) for one upfront yearly payment plus the option to purchase additional concurrency.

Source
Maestro: How does it compare with Appium?

Tests are YAML rather than code and flakiness handling is built in, which reduces maintenance, at the cost of lower-level control.

Codemagic: Is there a limit to monthly users on React Native CodePush?

Yes. On the fixed-price CodePush plan, users are billed per 100,000 Monthly Active Users (MAU). Overage pricing is $1 per 2,500 installs on pay-as-you-go or a higher per-instance fee on fixed plans.

Source
Maestro: Can it test web applications too?

Yes, the cloud offers hosted web devices alongside Android and iOS, though the product centre of gravity is mobile.

Share

Related pages

More on Codemagic

More on Maestro

Keep looking

Other head to heads