Softwr

Mobile Development · head to head

Codemagic vs Sencha

Codemagic logo

Codemagic

Mobile Development

CI/CD built for Flutter and mobile apps

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Sencha logo

Sencha

Mobile Development

Idera-owned, commercially licensed JavaScript framework for enterprise web and hybrid mobile apps

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Codemagic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Codemagic minute-based pricing opacity: exact costs for concurrent builds become difficult to predict at scale without calculator; Sencha it is the only commercially licensed framework in this category; a per-developer fee applies where Ionic, Capacitor, NativeScript, MAUI and Kotlin Multiplatform all cost nothing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Codemagic and Sencha actually diverge.

Attributes where Codemagic and Sencha differ
AttributeCodemagicSencha
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelusage-based|subscriptionOne-time purchase, per developer
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mobile Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Codemagic

Nothing recorded that Sencha does not also cover.

Only in Sencha

  • Enterprise grid components
  • Component library breadth
  • Cross-browser legacy support
  • Sencha Architect
  • Cmd build tooling
  • Mobile packaging

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Codemagic

  • Mobile CI/CD pipelines for iOS and Androidnot Sencha
  • React Native CodePush over-the-air update distributionnot Sencha
  • Enterprise multi-team CI/CD at scalenot Sencha

Sencha

  • An enterprise building a data-grid-heavy internal application where pre-built pivot tables and complex grids save real development timenot Codemagic
  • A team maintaining a long-lived legacy Ext JS codebase that predates the free-framework eranot Codemagic
  • An organisation needing guaranteed vendor support and licensed indemnity rather than community-supported open sourcenot Codemagic
  • A regulated industry buyer whose procurement process requires a commercially licensed vendor relationshipnot Codemagic

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Codemagic

  • Minute-based pricing opacity: exact costs for concurrent builds become difficult to predict at scale without calculator
  • Free tier severely limited to 500 minutes/month with single parallel build vs. competitors offering more generous free allocations
  • M1/M2/M4 pricing variance creates complexity; customers must right-size machine type upfront without clear performance guidance
  • Additional concurrency is expensive at $49/month per concurrent build, potentially costing $588/year per extra slot

Sencha

  • It is the only commercially licensed framework in this category; a per-developer fee applies where Ionic, Capacitor, NativeScript, MAUI and Kotlin Multiplatform all cost nothing.
  • Its mobile story is secondary to its web-grid heritage, so teams primarily building consumer mobile apps get less mobile-specific benefit than from a purpose-built mobile framework.
  • Idera has acquired numerous developer tool brands, and product investment across a large portfolio company is not guaranteed to prioritise any single acquired product indefinitely.
  • The developer hiring pool for Ext JS specifically has shrunk as React and Angular dominate new development, making it harder to staff new projects.
  • Community plugins, tutorials and Stack Overflow activity are far thinner than for any free, widely adopted framework in this category, so troubleshooting relies more on paid support than public resources.

Pricing, plan by plan

Codemagic

Free
  • Pay as You Go$undefined/mo
  • M2 Fixed Plan$3990/year
  • M4 Fixed Plan$5400/year
  • M4 Max Fixed Plan$9000/year

Sencha

On request
  • Ext JS$1895/year
    • Per-developer licence, with maintenance and support renewal
    • 30-day free evaluation trial available
    • OEM licensing available separately for redistribution

Which should you pick?

Choose Codemagic if

  • You want to start without paying.
Codemagic review

Choose Sencha if

  • You need enterprise grid components.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want component library breadth.
Sencha review

Questions people ask

Is Codemagic or Sencha better?
Neither clearly leads. Codemagic starts at Free and Sencha at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Codemagic or Sencha?
Codemagic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Codemagic and On request for Sencha.
Does Codemagic or Sencha run on more platforms?
Codemagic runs on Web. Sencha runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Codemagic for free?
Yes. Codemagic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sencha starts at On request.
What is Codemagic best used for?
Codemagic is most often used for mobile ci/cd pipelines for ios and android, react native codepush over-the-air update distribution, enterprise multi-team ci/cd at scale. Of those, mobile ci/cd pipelines for ios and android and react native codepush over-the-air update distribution are not what Sencha is typically brought in for.
What can Codemagic do that Sencha cannot?
Sencha covers Enterprise grid components, Component library breadth, Cross-browser legacy support, Sencha Architect.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Codemagic: How much does it cost to add more parallel builds?

Each additional concurrent build costs $49/month ($588/year). Fixed-plan customers can purchase additional concurrency at $1,500–$3,000/year depending on tier.

Source
Sencha: Is any part of Sencha free?

A 30-day evaluation trial is available; production use requires a purchased per-developer licence.

Codemagic: Does Codemagic offer a free tier?

Yes. The free tier includes 500 free M2 build minutes monthly with 1 parallel build maximum, then paid usage kicks in.

Source
Sencha: Who owns Sencha?

Idera, Inc., a private software holding company that also owns Xray and Xporter, two other Atlassian ecosystem products.

Codemagic: What is the difference between monthly billing and annual fixed plans?

Pay-as-you-go charges per minute of build time. Fixed annual plans provide unlimited minutes on a specific machine type (M2, M4, or M4 Max) for one upfront yearly payment plus the option to purchase additional concurrency.

Source
Sencha: Is Sencha mainly a mobile framework?

No. Its core strength is data-heavy enterprise web UI, particularly grids; mobile packaging is a secondary capability.

Codemagic: Is there a limit to monthly users on React Native CodePush?

Yes. On the fixed-price CodePush plan, users are billed per 100,000 Monthly Active Users (MAU). Overage pricing is $1 per 2,500 installs on pay-as-you-go or a higher per-instance fee on fixed plans.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Codemagic

More on Sencha

Keep looking

Other head to heads