Softwr

Game Development · head to head

Cocos Creator vs Three.js

Cocos Creator logo

Cocos Creator

Game Development

Free 2D and 3D engine with no royalties, dominant in Chinese mini-game platforms

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Three.js logo

Three.js

AR VR

JavaScript 3D library for WebGL and WebXR

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Cocos Creator documentation, forums and release notes are written in Chinese first and the English versions lag or stay incomplete, so an English-only team spends real time on translation and guesswork.; Three.js forward rendering pipeline only, no deferred rendering support
  • They diverge on capability: Cocos Creator covers TypeScript scripting, Three.js covers WebGL rendering.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cocos Creator and Three.js actually diverge.

Attributes where Cocos Creator and Three.js differ
AttributeCocos CreatorThree.js
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feefree
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Web, iOS, AndroidWeb, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android
CategoryGame DevelopmentAR VR
FoundedUnknown2010

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cocos Creator

  • TypeScript scripting
  • Mini-game export
  • Small build sizes
  • 2D and 3D pipelines
  • Open source runtime
  • No royalties

Only in Three.js

  • WebGL rendering
  • Scene graph
  • Materials system
  • Animation system
  • WebXR
  • Post-processing
  • Physics
  • Loaders

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cocos Creator

  • Shipping to WeChat, Douyin or other mini-game platforms where package size limits are enforcednot Three.js
  • Advertising-funded mobile games where a small download raises install conversionnot Three.js
  • Small teams that want a free 2D engine with no royalty or per install exposurenot Three.js
  • Studios targeting Asian mobile publishing where Cocos experience is common in the hiring poolnot Three.js

Three.js

  • VR Gamingnot Cocos Creator
  • AR Marketingnot Cocos Creator
  • Virtual Trainingnot Cocos Creator
  • 3D Visualizationnot Cocos Creator
  • Immersive Experiencesnot Cocos Creator

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cocos Creator

  • Documentation, forums and release notes are written in Chinese first and the English versions lag or stay incomplete, so an English-only team spends real time on translation and guesswork.
  • Most tutorials and Stack Overflow answers online describe Cocos2d-x, the older runtime, which is now legacy and structured differently from the current editor, so search results actively mislead new users.
  • The 3D pipeline is usable but behind general purpose engines on lighting, terrain, animation tooling and profiling, so an ambitious 3D project writes more of its own tooling.
  • Console publishing is not a supported export from the editor; reaching PlayStation, Xbox or Switch means porting partners or third-party services, which adds cost and schedule to a title that succeeds on mobile.
  • Hiring outside Asia is difficult because few developers have Cocos experience, which raises the cost of growing the team or handing the project to an outside studio later.

Three.js

  • Forward rendering pipeline only, no deferred rendering support
  • No built-in collision detection or spatial indexing, requiring external physics libraries
  • WebGL dependency means no support for non-WebGL environments

Pricing, plan by plan

Cocos Creator

Free
  • Cocos CreatorFree
    • Free for commercial use with no royalty
    • Open source engine runtime
    • All export targets included

Three.js

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Full library
    • WebXR module
    • Examples

Which should you pick?

Choose Cocos Creator if

  • You need typescript scripting.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want mini-game export.
Cocos Creator review

Choose Three.js if

  • You need webgl rendering.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.
  • You also want scene graph.
Three.js review

Questions people ask

Is Cocos Creator or Three.js better?
Neither clearly leads. Cocos Creator starts at Free and Three.js at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cocos Creator or Three.js?
Cocos Creator starts at Free and Three.js at Free.
Does Cocos Creator or Three.js run on more platforms?
Cocos Creator runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android. Three.js runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.
Can I use Cocos Creator for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Cocos Creator best used for?
Cocos Creator is most often used for shipping to wechat, douyin or other mini-game platforms where package size limits are enforced, advertising-funded mobile games where a small download raises install conversion, small teams that want a free 2d engine with no royalty or per install exposure, studios targeting asian mobile publishing where cocos experience is common in the hiring pool. Of those, shipping to wechat, douyin or other mini-game platforms where package size limits are enforced and advertising-funded mobile games where a small download raises install conversion are not what Three.js is typically brought in for.
What can Cocos Creator do that Three.js cannot?
Cocos Creator covers TypeScript scripting, Mini-game export, Small build sizes, 2D and 3D pipelines. Three.js covers WebGL rendering, Scene graph, Materials system, Animation system.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cocos Creator: Does Cocos take a revenue share?

No. It is free for commercial use with no royalty, no revenue threshold and no per install charge.

Three.js: Is Three.js free to use?

Yes. Three.js is released under the MIT license, an open-source license that permits unlimited commercial and personal use with no licensing fees.

Source
Cocos Creator: Is it only useful for mini-games?

No, it exports to iOS, Android, desktop and the web. Mini-game platforms are where it has an advantage no other engine matches, because of build size.

Three.js: Does Three.js include physics simulation?

No. Three.js is a rendering library only. Physics, collision detection, and spatial indexing must be implemented with external libraries like Rapier, Ammo, or JoltPhysics.

Source
Cocos Creator: What is the difference from Cocos2d-x?

Cocos2d-x is the older code-first framework. Cocos Creator is the current editor-driven engine with TypeScript scripting. New projects should use Creator even though more tutorials describe Cocos2d-x.

Three.js: Can I use Three.js for offline development?

Yes. Local development requires a local web server for CORS compliance. You can use npm with a build tool like Vite, or run a local Python server for development.

Source
Three.js: Does Three.js support WebXR for VR/AR?

Yes. Three.js documentation includes WebXR APIs for building VR and AR experiences in web browsers.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Cocos Creator

More on Three.js

Keep looking

Other head to heads