Construction · head to head
CMiC vs Oracle Textura Payment Management

Oracle Textura Payment Management
Construction
Construction payment, lien waiver and compliance workflow where the subcontractor pays the fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CMiC no specific pricing disclosed on website; Oracle Textura Payment Management the subcontractors pay 0.22 per cent of their contract value to invoice a customer that chose the platform for them, which makes rollout a negotiation with every trade on the job and produces genuine refusals from small specialty contractors
- They diverge on capability: CMiC covers Project management, Oracle Textura Payment Management covers Pay application workflow.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CMiC and Oracle Textura Payment Management actually diverge.
| Attribute | CMiC | Oracle Textura Payment Management |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $300/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Percentage of subcontract value, plus a quoted contractor subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Web |
| Founded | 1985 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CMiC
- Project management
- Accounting
- Document management
- Job costing
- Field operations
- QuickBooks
- Sage
- Microsoft 365
Only in Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver automation
- Compliance document tracking
- Sub-tier visibility
- Funds disbursement
- Owner and lender draws
- Integration to ERP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CMiC
- Insurance and risk managementnot Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Professional liability coveragenot Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Construction industry insurancenot Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management
- A general contractor on a 200 million dollar hospital wants every lien waiver in the correct state form before funds leave the account, with an audit trail the title company will acceptnot CMiC
- A developer requires sub-tier visibility down two levels because a supplier lien on a previous project cost it a payment it had already madenot CMiC
- An owner-lender arrangement needs the upstream draw package to be assembled automatically from the approved downstream billings each monthnot CMiC
- A contractor operating across several US states wants the statutory waiver language selected by jurisdiction rather than by a coordinator with a template foldernot CMiC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CMiC
- No specific pricing disclosed on website
- Website directs users to /pricing page for quotes only
- Custom quoting model used for all customers
- No tiered plans or standard pricing published
Oracle Textura Payment Management
- The subcontractors pay 0.22 per cent of their contract value to invoice a customer that chose the platform for them, which makes rollout a negotiation with every trade on the job and produces genuine refusals from small specialty contractors
- The fee is charged per project, so a subcontractor working ten projects a year for Textura-using general contractors pays ten times, and there is no annual cap across projects
- Subcontractor-side usability is poor enough that trades routinely need coaching for their first pay application, and the general contractor absorbs that support burden even though Oracle collects the fee
- It is an Oracle enterprise product, which means procurement, contract negotiation and an implementation partner, so the time from signature to first live project is measured in months and not weeks
- Data export on project closeout is limited to reports and standard extracts rather than a full structured handover, so a contractor leaving the platform keeps the PDFs but loses much of the queryable payment history
Pricing, plan by plan
CMiC
$300/month- Core$300/month
- Project management
- Accounting
- Document management
- EnterpriseFree
- Mobile field app
- Advanced analytics
- API access
Oracle Textura Payment Management
On request- Subcontractor usage fee$undefined/project
- 0.22 per cent of subcontract value on projects created after 19 January 2023
- No minimum fee
- Capped at 5,000 USD, reached around 2.3 million USD of contract value
- General contractor subscription$undefined/year
- Quoted by Oracle against project volume and modules
- Not published
- Usually sold with Primavera or Aconex
Which should you pick?
Choose CMiC if
- You need project management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want accounting.
Choose Oracle Textura Payment Management if
- You need pay application workflow.
- You also want lien waiver automation.
Questions people ask
- Is CMiC or Oracle Textura Payment Management better?
- Neither clearly leads. CMiC starts at $300/month and Oracle Textura Payment Management at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CMiC or Oracle Textura Payment Management?
- CMiC starts at $300/month and Oracle Textura Payment Management at On request.
- Does CMiC or Oracle Textura Payment Management run on more platforms?
- CMiC runs on Web, Ios, Android. Oracle Textura Payment Management runs on Web.
- What is CMiC best used for?
- CMiC is most often used for insurance and risk management, professional liability coverage, construction industry insurance. Of those, insurance and risk management and professional liability coverage are not what Oracle Textura Payment Management is typically brought in for.
- What can CMiC do that Oracle Textura Payment Management cannot?
- CMiC covers Project management, Accounting, Document management, Job costing. Oracle Textura Payment Management covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver automation, Compliance document tracking, Sub-tier visibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CMiC: How much does CMiC cost?
CMiC does not publish fixed pricing on its website. The company uses a custom quote model. Interested parties must visit the /pricing page or contact CMiC directly to request a quote for their specific needs.
SourceOracle Textura Payment Management: Who actually pays for Textura, the general contractor or the subcontractor?
Both. The general contractor pays Oracle a subscription that is not published. Each subcontractor is separately billed 0.22 per cent of its contract value per project, capped at 5,000 US dollars, with a flat 100 dollars for sub-tier contracts.
CMiC: What is CMiC's pricing model?
CMiC uses a custom enterprise pricing model rather than published tiered plans. All pricing is determined on a case-by-case basis through their sales team.
SourceOracle Textura Payment Management: Can a subcontractor refuse to use it?
In practice no, if the prime contract mandates it, because pay applications are only accepted through the platform. Some subcontractors price the fee into their bid instead.
Oracle Textura Payment Management: Is Textura the same thing as Textura Payment Management?
Yes. Oracle sells one product under the name Oracle Textura Payment Management. There is no separate Textura product line to buy.
Oracle Textura Payment Management: Does it handle lien waivers outside the United States?
It has European and Australian variants with local payment and compliance handling, but the statutory lien waiver machinery is a United States feature and is the main reason to buy it.
Related pages
More on Oracle Textura Payment Management
Other head to heads
- CMiC vs Procore
- CMiC vs SketchUp
- CMiC vs ArchiCAD
- CMiC vs Autodesk Revit
- CMiC vs Jonas Premier
- CMiC vs Viewpoint Vista
- CMiC vs e-Builder
- CMiC vs Sage 300 Construction
- CMiC vs Foundation Software
- CMiC vs Adaptive
- CMiC vs HCSS
- CMiC vs Primavera P6
- CMiC vs Builderbox
- CMiC vs Buildots
- CMiC vs Buildxact
- CMiC vs Chief Architect
- CMiC vs Clearstory
- CMiC vs CoConstruct
- CMiC vs Trimble Pay
- CMiC vs GCPay
- CMiC vs Siteline
- CMiC vs Billd
- CMiC vs Kojo
- CMiC vs Assignar
- CMiC vs Bridgit Bravo
- CMiC vs Document Crunch
- CMiC vs Togal.AI
- CMiC vs Knowify
- CMiC vs Levelset
- CMiC vs Openspace
- CMiC vs Reconstruct
- CMiC vs Smartsheet Construction
- CMiC vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Procore
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs SketchUp
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs ArchiCAD
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Autodesk Revit
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Jonas Premier
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Viewpoint Vista
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs e-Builder
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Sage 300 Construction
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Foundation Software
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Adaptive
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs HCSS
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Primavera P6
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Builderbox
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Buildots
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Buildxact
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Chief Architect
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Clearstory
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs CoConstruct
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Trimble Pay
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs GCPay
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Siteline
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Billd
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Kojo
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Assignar
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Bridgit Bravo
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Document Crunch
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Togal.AI
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Knowify
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Levelset
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Openspace
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Reconstruct
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs Smartsheet Construction
- Oracle Textura Payment Management vs STACK Construction Technologies

