Software · head to head
CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB; Elasticsearch Service the 99.95 percent monthly uptime SLA applies only to the Platinum and Enterprise subscription tiers
- They diverge on capability: CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Elasticsearch Service covers Full-text search.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudWatch and Elasticsearch Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | CloudWatch | Elasticsearch Service |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Only in Elasticsearch Service
- Full-text search
- Scalability
- High availability
- Security
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Elasticsearch Service
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Elasticsearch Service
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Elasticsearch Service
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Elasticsearch Service
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Elasticsearch Service
Elasticsearch Service
- Managed Elasticsearch without running the clusternot CloudWatch
- Log and observability data storage and searchnot CloudWatch
- Full-text search behind an applicationnot CloudWatch
- Deployments needing a specific cloud region across AWS, Azure or GCPnot CloudWatch
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Elasticsearch Service
- The 99.95 percent monthly uptime SLA applies only to the Platinum and Enterprise subscription tiers
- Serverless does not yet support traffic filtering, cross-project search or bring-your-own-key encryption
- Serverless runs on AWS, GCP and Azure only, against 60 regions for the hosted option
- Per-unit prices are not published; hosted is resource-based and serverless usage-based
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Elasticsearch Service
Free- FreeFree
- Full-text search
- Scalability
- High availability
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Choose Elasticsearch Service if
- You need full-text search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want scalability.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudWatch or Elasticsearch Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudWatch starts at Free and Elasticsearch Service at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudWatch or Elasticsearch Service?
- CloudWatch starts at Free and Elasticsearch Service at Free.
- Does CloudWatch or Elasticsearch Service run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CloudWatch for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudWatch best used for?
- CloudWatch is most often used for metrics and log collection for aws workloads, alarming on thresholds across aws services, querying logs with logs insights, live tailing logs during an incident. Of those, metrics and log collection for aws workloads and alarming on thresholds across aws services are not what Elasticsearch Service is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudWatch do that Elasticsearch Service cannot?
- CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Elasticsearch Service covers Full-text search, Scalability, High availability, Security. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Elasticsearch Service
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs New Relic
- Elasticsearch Service vs Datadog Logs
- Elasticsearch Service vs Coralogix
- Elasticsearch Service vs Grafana Loki
- Elasticsearch Service vs Dynatrace
- Elasticsearch Service vs InfluxDB
- Elasticsearch Service vs Airbrake
- Elasticsearch Service vs AppDynamics
- Elasticsearch Service vs Axiom
- Elasticsearch Service vs Azure Monitor
- Elasticsearch Service vs Better Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs Bugsnag
- Elasticsearch Service vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic APM
- Elasticsearch Service vs ELK Stack


