Travel · head to head
Cloudbeds vs Skyscanner

Cloudbeds
Travel
Cloud-based hospitality management platform unifying PMS, channel management, and booking engine
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Skyscanner
Travel
Flight, hotel and car hire metasearch engine that compares prices across booking sites and earns referral fees rather than selling the ticket itself
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Skyscanner has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cloudbeds pricing requires custom quote; no published pricing tiers visible, making budgeting and comparison difficult; Skyscanner because Skyscanner is not the merchant of record for most bookings, customer service, cancellations and fare accuracy responsibility sit with whichever partner site the traveller is referred to, not with Skyscanner itself.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cloudbeds and Skyscanner actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cloudbeds | Skyscanner |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Free for travellers, referral fees from booking partners |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Travel).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cloudbeds
Nothing recorded that Skyscanner does not also cover.
Only in Skyscanner
- Flight price comparison
- Flexible date and destination search
- Hotel and car hire comparison
- Price alerts
- Direct booking for select flights
- Multi-city and layover search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cloudbeds
- Independent hotels and boutique hospitality businesses automating PMS and distributionnot Skyscanner
- Vacation rental hosts (Airbnb, VRBO) consolidating multi-channel bookings and messagingnot Skyscanner
- Hostels and backpacker accommodations using commission-free booking engine to reduce dependency on OTAsnot Skyscanner
- Small-chain hospitality operators managing multiple properties from one interfacenot Skyscanner
- Properties seeking revenue management and dynamic pricing without enterprise-level PMS costsnot Skyscanner
- Hospitality businesses using AI-driven guest messaging and support automationnot Skyscanner
Skyscanner
- A traveller wanting to compare flight prices across many airlines and agents quickly before deciding where to booknot Cloudbeds
- Someone with flexible travel dates wanting to browse the cheapest dates or destinations without a fixed itinerarynot Cloudbeds
- A traveller wanting hotel or car hire price comparison across multiple sites in one searchnot Cloudbeds
- Someone who wants a price alert on a specific route to book when the fare drops, before committingnot Cloudbeds
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cloudbeds
- Pricing requires custom quote; no published pricing tiers visible, making budgeting and comparison difficult
- Per-property pricing model means costs scale rapidly for multi-property management; portfolio growth increases operational expenses
- Revenue Intelligence (AI pricing) locked behind premium tier; base offering lacks dynamic pricing automation
- Limited offline functionality; properties with poor connectivity face operational challenges
- Chatbot and messaging automation require configuration; setup complexity increases for non-technical operators
Skyscanner
- Because Skyscanner is not the merchant of record for most bookings, customer service, cancellations and fare accuracy responsibility sit with whichever partner site the traveller is referred to, not with Skyscanner itself.
- Prices shown in comparison results can occasionally be inaccurate or unavailable by the time the traveller reaches the partner site, since prices are pulled from partner feeds that update on their own schedule.
- Booking through a smaller, unfamiliar third-party travel agent surfaced in comparison results carries more risk around customer service quality and fare rules than booking directly with an airline or a well-known agency.
- The referral fee business model can create an incentive to surface partners paying higher commission prominently, and Skyscanner does not publish which listed results are influenced by commission versus pure price ranking.
- The newer direct booking option covers only some flights, so most bookings still route the traveller through a third-party partner site, meaning the core experience remains a redirect rather than a self-contained transaction.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cloudbeds
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Cloudbeds review.
Skyscanner
Free- SkyscannerFree
- Free to search and compare for travellers, no subscription or comparison fee charged
- Revenue comes from referral or affiliate fees paid by airlines, agents and hotel sites on completed bookings
- Skyscanner does not hold the payment or booking relationship for most results, the partner site does
Which should you pick?
Choose Skyscanner if
- You need flight price comparison.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want flexible date and destination search.
Questions people ask
- Is Cloudbeds or Skyscanner better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cloudbeds starts at On request and Skyscanner at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cloudbeds or Skyscanner?
- Skyscanner has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Cloudbeds and Free for Skyscanner.
- Does Cloudbeds or Skyscanner run on more platforms?
- Cloudbeds runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Skyscanner runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Skyscanner for free?
- Yes. Skyscanner has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cloudbeds starts at On request.
- What is Cloudbeds best used for?
- Cloudbeds is most often used for independent hotels and boutique hospitality businesses automating pms and distribution, vacation rental hosts (airbnb, vrbo) consolidating multi-channel bookings and messaging, hostels and backpacker accommodations using commission-free booking engine to reduce dependency on otas, small-chain hospitality operators managing multiple properties from one interface. Of those, independent hotels and boutique hospitality businesses automating pms and distribution and vacation rental hosts (airbnb, vrbo) consolidating multi-channel bookings and messaging are not what Skyscanner is typically brought in for.
- What can Cloudbeds do that Skyscanner cannot?
- Skyscanner covers Flight price comparison, Flexible date and destination search, Hotel and car hire comparison, Price alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cloudbeds: Does Cloudbeds have a commission-free booking engine?
Yes. Cloudbeds provides a commission-free booking engine allowing guests to reserve directly on the property website without OTA transaction fees. This reduces distribution costs compared to Booking.com and Airbnb.
SourceSkyscanner: Does Skyscanner sell the ticket or hotel room?
For most results, no. It compares prices and refers the traveller to the airline, agent or hotel site to complete the actual booking and payment; it has recently added direct booking for some flights only.
Cloudbeds: What channels does Cloudbeds distribute to?
Cloudbeds distributes to 450+ booking channels including Airbnb, Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, and regional OTAs, all managed from one interface.
SourceSkyscanner: How does Skyscanner make money if it is free to use?
It earns referral or affiliate fees from airlines, travel agents and hotel booking sites when a comparison click leads to a completed booking on their site.
Cloudbeds: Does Cloudbeds provide revenue management?
Yes. Revenue Intelligence uses AI-powered demand forecasting (95% accuracy) to recommend dynamic pricing, maximising revenue per available room (RevPAR).
SourceSkyscanner: Is Skyscanner the same kind of company as Booking.com or Expedia?
No. Those are merchants of record that process payment and hold the booking directly, earning commission or package margin. Skyscanner is a metasearch comparison layer that mostly refers travellers elsewhere to book.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cloudbeds vs Little Hotelier
- Cloudbeds vs Guesty
- Cloudbeds vs Clock PMS+
- Cloudbeds vs Hostaway
- Cloudbeds vs Hotelogix
- Cloudbeds vs Revinate
- Cloudbeds vs TrustYou
- Cloudbeds vs RoomRaccoon
- Cloudbeds vs Sirvoy
- Cloudbeds vs Duetto
- Cloudbeds vs WebRezPro
- Cloudbeds vs Bookinglayer
- Cloudbeds vs Egencia
- Cloudbeds vs Lodgify
- Cloudbeds vs Rezdy
- Cloudbeds vs TripAdvisor
- Cloudbeds vs Bokun
- Cloudbeds vs SiteMinder
- Cloudbeds vs Expedia
- Cloudbeds vs Booking.com
- Cloudbeds vs Kayak
- Cloudbeds vs Hopper
- Cloudbeds vs Redeam
- Cloudbeds vs Corporate Traveller
- Cloudbeds vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Cloudbeds vs myCWT
- Cloudbeds vs Roomsy
- Cloudbeds vs Protel
- Cloudbeds vs Shiji
- Cloudbeds vs Spotnana
- Cloudbeds vs ThinkReservations
- Skyscanner vs Little Hotelier
- Skyscanner vs Guesty
- Skyscanner vs Clock PMS+
- Skyscanner vs Hostaway
- Skyscanner vs Hotelogix
- Skyscanner vs Revinate
- Skyscanner vs TrustYou
- Skyscanner vs RoomRaccoon
- Skyscanner vs Sirvoy
- Skyscanner vs Duetto
- Skyscanner vs WebRezPro
- Skyscanner vs Bookinglayer
- Skyscanner vs Egencia
- Skyscanner vs Lodgify
- Skyscanner vs Rezdy
- Skyscanner vs TripAdvisor
- Skyscanner vs Bokun
- Skyscanner vs SiteMinder
- Skyscanner vs Expedia
- Skyscanner vs Booking.com
- Skyscanner vs Kayak
- Skyscanner vs Hopper
- Skyscanner vs Redeam
- Skyscanner vs Corporate Traveller
- Skyscanner vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Skyscanner vs myCWT
- Skyscanner vs Roomsy
- Skyscanner vs Protel
- Skyscanner vs Shiji
- Skyscanner vs Spotnana
- Skyscanner vs ThinkReservations
