Project Management · head to head
Clockwise vs Hookdeck
Clockwise
Project Management
Intelligent calendar management for teams
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Clockwise is an AI-powered calendar assistant.
- Free plans on both; paid from $6.75/mo and $39/mo.
- Only Clockwise lists focus Time protection; only Hookdeck lists ingest and persist.
- Where Clockwise falls short: service discontinued and shut down on March 27, 2026.
- Where Hookdeck falls short: pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clockwise and Hookdeck actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Hookdeck.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clockwise
- Focus Time protection
- Meeting optimization
- Scheduling links
- Team analytics
- Conflict resolution
- Google Calendar
- Slack
- Zoom
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clockwise
- Schedulingnot Hookdeck
- Appointment bookingnot Hookdeck
- Time trackingnot Hookdeck
- Resource managementnot Hookdeck
- Team coordinationnot Hookdeck
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Clockwise
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Clockwise
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Clockwise
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Clockwise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clockwise
- Service discontinued and shut down on March 27, 2026
- All user data was deleted upon shutdown
- Integration with Asana was removed during product lifecycle
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate
Pricing, plan by plan
Clockwise
Free- FreeFree
- Focus Time
- Meeting optimization
- Personal analytics
- Teams$6.75/mo
- Team analytics
- Flexible meetings
- Admin controls
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/mo
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/mo
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Clockwise if
- You need focus time protection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want meeting optimization.
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Questions people ask
- Is Clockwise or Hookdeck better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clockwise starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clockwise or Hookdeck?
- Clockwise starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free.
- Does Clockwise or Hookdeck run on more platforms?
- Clockwise runs on Web. Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Clockwise for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clockwise best used for?
- Clockwise is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Hookdeck is typically brought in for.
- What can Clockwise do that Hookdeck cannot?
- Clockwise covers Focus Time protection, Meeting optimization, Scheduling links, Team analytics. Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clockwise: What happened to Clockwise?
Clockwise was acquired by Salesforce and shut down on March 27, 2026. The company announced the team was joining Salesforce to work on Agentforce. User data was deleted and prorated refunds were issued to paying customers.
SourceHookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Clockwise: What integrations did Clockwise support?
Clockwise integrated with Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Slack, and previously Asana (though this integration was discontinued).
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Clockwise: What were Clockwise's key features?
Clockwise offered AI-powered focus time protection, automatic meeting buffers, Slack status sync, smart lunch breaks, and team calendar synchronization to optimize schedules and prevent burnout.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Hookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clockwise vs Reclaim.ai
- Clockwise vs Toggl Plan
- Clockwise vs Sunsama
- Clockwise vs Taskade
- Clockwise vs ClickUp
- Clockwise vs Hive
- Clockwise vs GanttPRO
- Clockwise vs Roadmunk
- Clockwise vs LiquidPlanner
- Clockwise vs Podio
- Clockwise vs Trello
- Clockwise vs Basecamp
- Clockwise vs Visor
- Clockwise vs Zoho Projects
- Clockwise vs Asana
- Clockwise vs Linear
- Clockwise vs Monday.com
- Clockwise vs Jira
- Clockwise vs Jitsu
- Clockwise vs Envoy
- Clockwise vs Istio
- Clockwise vs GitLab
- Clockwise vs Spacelift
- Clockwise vs Garden
- Clockwise vs Webpack
- Clockwise vs Backstage
- Clockwise vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Clockwise vs Dagger
- Clockwise vs Okteto
- Clockwise vs Terraform
- Clockwise vs GitHub
- Clockwise vs Harness
- Clockwise vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Clockwise vs Keil MDK
- Clockwise vs Moonrepo
- Clockwise vs Nx Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Reclaim.ai
- Hookdeck vs Toggl Plan
- Hookdeck vs Sunsama
- Hookdeck vs Taskade
- Hookdeck vs ClickUp
- Hookdeck vs Hive
- Hookdeck vs GanttPRO
- Hookdeck vs Roadmunk
- Hookdeck vs LiquidPlanner
- Hookdeck vs Podio
- Hookdeck vs Trello
- Hookdeck vs Basecamp
- Hookdeck vs Visor
- Hookdeck vs Zoho Projects
- Hookdeck vs Asana
- Hookdeck vs Linear
- Hookdeck vs Monday.com
- Hookdeck vs Jira
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Envoy
- Hookdeck vs Istio
- Hookdeck vs GitLab
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Terraform
- Hookdeck vs GitHub
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Hookdeck vs Keil MDK
- Hookdeck vs Moonrepo
- Hookdeck vs Nx Cloud
