Project Management · head to head
Clockwise vs Garden
Clockwise
Project Management
Intelligent calendar management for teams
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Clockwise is an AI-powered calendar assistant.
- Garden is free; Clockwise starts at $6.75/mo.
- Only Clockwise lists focus Time protection; only Garden lists action graph.
- Where Clockwise falls short: service discontinued and shut down on March 27, 2026.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clockwise and Garden actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Garden.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clockwise
- Focus Time protection
- Meeting optimization
- Scheduling links
- Team analytics
- Conflict resolution
- Google Calendar
- Slack
- Zoom
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clockwise
- Schedulingnot Garden
- Appointment bookingnot Garden
- Time trackingnot Garden
- Resource managementnot Garden
- Team coordinationnot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Clockwise
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Clockwise
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Clockwise
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Clockwise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clockwise
- Service discontinued and shut down on March 27, 2026
- All user data was deleted upon shutdown
- Integration with Asana was removed during product lifecycle
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice
Pricing, plan by plan
Clockwise
Free- FreeFree
- Focus Time
- Meeting optimization
- Personal analytics
- Teams$6.75/mo
- Team analytics
- Flexible meetings
- Admin controls
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tierOn request
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Clockwise if
- You need focus time protection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want meeting optimization.
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Clockwise or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clockwise starts at Free and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clockwise or Garden?
- Clockwise starts at Free and Garden at Free.
- Does Clockwise or Garden run on more platforms?
- Clockwise runs on Web. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Clockwise for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clockwise best used for?
- Clockwise is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Clockwise do that Garden cannot?
- Clockwise covers Focus Time protection, Meeting optimization, Scheduling links, Team analytics. Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clockwise: What happened to Clockwise?
Clockwise was acquired by Salesforce and shut down on March 27, 2026. The company announced the team was joining Salesforce to work on Agentforce. User data was deleted and prorated refunds were issued to paying customers.
SourceGarden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Clockwise: What integrations did Clockwise support?
Clockwise integrated with Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Slack, and previously Asana (though this integration was discontinued).
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Clockwise: What were Clockwise's key features?
Clockwise offered AI-powered focus time protection, automatic meeting buffers, Slack status sync, smart lunch breaks, and team calendar synchronization to optimize schedules and prevent burnout.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Garden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clockwise vs Reclaim.ai
- Clockwise vs Toggl Plan
- Clockwise vs Sunsama
- Clockwise vs Taskade
- Clockwise vs ClickUp
- Clockwise vs Hive
- Clockwise vs GanttPRO
- Clockwise vs Roadmunk
- Clockwise vs LiquidPlanner
- Clockwise vs Podio
- Clockwise vs Trello
- Clockwise vs Basecamp
- Clockwise vs Visor
- Clockwise vs Zoho Projects
- Clockwise vs Asana
- Clockwise vs Linear
- Clockwise vs Monday.com
- Clockwise vs Jira
- Clockwise vs Okteto
- Clockwise vs Docker
- Clockwise vs Kubernetes
- Clockwise vs Depot
- Clockwise vs Earthly
- Clockwise vs Ansible
- Clockwise vs WarpBuild
- Clockwise vs Nix
- Clockwise vs GitLab
- Clockwise vs Blacksmith
- Clockwise vs Jenkins
- Clockwise vs GitHub Copilot
- Clockwise vs LaunchDarkly
- Clockwise vs Terraform
- Clockwise vs Visual Studio Code
- Clockwise vs CodeSandbox
- Clockwise vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Clockwise vs Tilt
- Garden vs Reclaim.ai
- Garden vs Toggl Plan
- Garden vs Sunsama
- Garden vs Taskade
- Garden vs ClickUp
- Garden vs Hive
- Garden vs GanttPRO
- Garden vs Roadmunk
- Garden vs LiquidPlanner
- Garden vs Podio
- Garden vs Trello
- Garden vs Basecamp
- Garden vs Visor
- Garden vs Zoho Projects
- Garden vs Asana
- Garden vs Linear
- Garden vs Monday.com
- Garden vs Jira
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Docker
- Garden vs Kubernetes
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs GitLab
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Jenkins
- Garden vs GitHub Copilot
- Garden vs LaunchDarkly
- Garden vs Terraform
- Garden vs Visual Studio Code
- Garden vs CodeSandbox
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs Tilt
