Software · head to head
Clay vs QAD
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, QAD covers Financial management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and QAD actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- Quality management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot QAD
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot QAD
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot Clay
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot Clay
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot Clay
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want manufacturing.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or QAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and QAD at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or QAD?
- Clay starts at On request and QAD at $2000/month.
- Does Clay or QAD run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what QAD is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that QAD cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. QAD covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory management. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs DEAR Systems
- Clay vs Fishbowl
- Clay vs Infor CloudSuite
- Clay vs MRPeasy
- Clay vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- Clay vs Oracle NetSuite
- Clay vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Clay vs Sage X3
- Clay vs SYSPRO
- Clay vs Aptean
- Clay vs Axonaut
- Clay vs BatchMaster
- Clay vs bexio
- Clay vs Bling
- Clay vs Blue Link ERP
- Clay vs Cegid
- Clay vs Cin7 Core
- Clay vs Cin7
- QAD vs Outreach
- QAD vs Gong
- QAD vs Seismic
- QAD vs Pipedrive
- QAD vs HubSpot
- QAD vs Salesforce
- QAD vs Bitrix24
- QAD vs Capsule
- QAD vs Clari
- QAD vs Freshsales
- QAD vs Streak
- QAD vs Zoho CRM
- QAD vs Affinity
- QAD vs Agile CRM
- QAD vs Apollo.io
- QAD vs Capsule CRM
- QAD vs Clearbit
- QAD vs Cloze
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- QAD vs Oracle NetSuite
- QAD vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- QAD vs Sage X3
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Axonaut
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs bexio
- QAD vs Bling
- QAD vs Blue Link ERP
- QAD vs Cegid
- QAD vs Cin7 Core
- QAD vs Cin7


