Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Checkr vs Omnipresent

Checkr logo

Checkr

Recruitment

Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately

From
On request
Rated
-
Omnipresent logo

Omnipresent

Payroll

Employer of record with a service-led model and a mix of owned and partner entities across 160 countries

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Checkr advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties; Omnipresent pricing sits above the low-cost EOR vendors and is quoted per country, so a company placing many low-salary roles pays a service premium it will not use.
  • They diverge on capability: Checkr covers Package pricing, Omnipresent covers Employer of record.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Checkr and Omnipresent actually diverge.

Attributes where Checkr and Omnipresent differ
AttributeCheckrOmnipresent
Pricing modelPer report, plus pass-through court and database feesquote
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CategoryRecruitmentPayroll

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Checkr

  • Package pricing
  • API and dashboard
  • Adjudication tools
  • Continuous checks
  • Candidate portal

Only in Omnipresent

  • Employer of record
  • Owned and partner entities
  • Country cost calculator
  • Negotiated local benefits
  • Named specialists
  • Global mobility
  • Contractor engagement
  • Offboarding support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Checkr

  • A company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs API-driven checks integrated into an existing ATSnot Omnipresent
  • A startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account managernot Omnipresent
  • An employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hirenot Omnipresent
  • A company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires innot Omnipresent

Omnipresent

  • A company hiring senior staff in a new country where a misclassification or termination error would be expensivenot Checkr
  • An employer that wants benefits genuinely competitive in each local market rather than a uniform global packagenot Checkr
  • A business testing a market for eighteen months before deciding whether to incorporatenot Checkr
  • A team that needs an employment adviser to answer notice period and severance questions before an offer goes outnot Checkr

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Checkr

  • Advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
  • Turnaround time depends on how fast individual courts process requests, which Checkr does not control and which can stretch well past the advertised average in rural or backlogged counties
  • Add-on checks such as MVR, drug screening and education verification are priced separately, so a full pre-employment package can cost significantly more than the base package price suggests
  • Enterprise-scale volume requires a custom Enterprise contract rather than the published per-report rates, so large employers cannot rely on the public pricing page to budget
  • Compliance obligations under the FCRA and state ban-the-box laws remain the employer's responsibility even though Checkr provides tooling, so legal review is still needed rather than assumed away by the platform
  • Candidate disputes and re-adjudication can add days to a hiring timeline, which matters for roles filled under time pressure

Omnipresent

  • Pricing sits above the low-cost EOR vendors and is quoted per country, so a company placing many low-salary roles pays a service premium it will not use.
  • Coverage combines owned entities with in-country partners, and in partner countries the employment liability and payroll calculation belong to a third party rather than to Omnipresent directly.
  • The platform is not an HRIS, so employee records, performance and time off for your directly employed staff still live somewhere else and the two systems have to be reconciled.
  • Statutory deposits and employer contributions are billed separately from the platform fee, and companies routinely underestimate the first-year cash requirement as a result.
  • An EOR is the wrong instrument once headcount in a country passes roughly fifteen to twenty people, and the migration to your own entity is a project the vendor has no incentive to accelerate.

Pricing, plan by plan

Checkr

On request
  • Basic$29.99/report
    • SSN trace
    • Sex offender registry
    • Global watchlist
  • Essential$59.99/report
    • Everything in Basic
    • Identity verification
    • Unlimited county criminal search
  • Complete$94.99/report
    • Everything in Essential
    • Unlimited state criminal search
    • Federal criminal search

Omnipresent

On request
  • Employer of Record$undefined/year
    • Priced per employee per month, quoted by country
    • Statutory deposit and employer contributions charged separately
    • Currency conversion applied on payroll runs
  • Contractor Management$undefined/year
    • Per contractor monthly fee
    • Classification assessment
    • Compliant contract templates

Which should you pick?

Choose Checkr if

  • You need package pricing.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want api and dashboard.

Choose Omnipresent if

  • You need employer of record.
  • You also want owned and partner entities.

Questions people ask

Is Checkr or Omnipresent better?
Neither clearly leads. Checkr starts at On request and Omnipresent at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Checkr or Omnipresent?
Checkr starts at On request and Omnipresent at On request.
Does Checkr or Omnipresent run on more platforms?
Checkr runs on Web, API. Omnipresent runs on Web.
What is Checkr best used for?
Checkr is most often used for a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats, a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager, an employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hire, a company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires in. Of those, a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats and a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager are not what Omnipresent is typically brought in for.
What can Checkr do that Omnipresent cannot?
Checkr covers Package pricing, API and dashboard, Adjudication tools, Continuous checks. Omnipresent covers Employer of record, Owned and partner entities, Country cost calculator, Negotiated local benefits.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Checkr: Does the per-report price include court fees?

No. Checkr states that standard third-party court and database access fees are passed through at cost on top of the package price, and these vary by jurisdiction.

Omnipresent: Which countries are owned entities?

Omnipresent owns entities in a subset of its 160-plus country coverage and uses vetted partners elsewhere. Request the list for your specific countries before signing.

Checkr: Can Checkr be used without an ATS integration?

Yes, checks can be ordered manually through the Checkr dashboard as well as programmatically through the API.

Omnipresent: Why is it more expensive than the budget EORs?

It bundles named advisory support and locally negotiated benefits rather than selling a self-service platform at a low headline rate.

Checkr: Is pricing different for enterprise volume?

Yes, high-volume employers negotiate an Enterprise contract rather than paying the published per-report rates.

Omnipresent: Does the quoted fee include employer taxes?

No. Employer contributions, statutory deposits and currency conversion are separate from the per employee platform fee.

Omnipresent: When should we stop using an EOR?

Once a country reaches roughly fifteen to twenty employees, running your own entity is usually cheaper and gives you direct control of employment terms.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads