Technology · head to head
Checkmk vs Hookdeck

Checkmk
Technology
Comprehensive IT monitoring, open and flexible
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Checkmk pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average); Hookdeck pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Checkmk and Hookdeck actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Checkmk
Nothing recorded that Hookdeck does not also cover.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Checkmk
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Hookdeck
- System observabilitynot Hookdeck
- Enterprise compliance monitoringnot Hookdeck
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Checkmk
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Checkmk
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Checkmk
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Checkmk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Checkmk
- Pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average)
- Professional support limited to 8-10 hours per week on base plans
- Synthetic monitoring is separate add-on with per-test pricing
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone.
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once.
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead.
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate.
Pricing, plan by plan
Checkmk
Free- Community (Self-Hosted)Free
- No cost, forever
- Up to ~100 hosts
- Basic infrastructure monitoring
- Pro (Self-Hosted)$190/month
- Advanced analytics
- Reporting
- Distributed monitoring
- Ultimate (Self-Hosted)$275/month
- Full-stack observability
- Advanced security compliance
- 10 hours x 5 days professional support (upgradable to 24/7)
- CloudAI (SaaS)$240/month
- Fully managed cloud hosting
- 99.5% uptime SLA
- Supports up to 50000 services
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/month
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/month
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Questions people ask
- Is Checkmk or Hookdeck better?
- Neither clearly leads. Checkmk starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Checkmk or Hookdeck?
- Checkmk starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free.
- Does Checkmk or Hookdeck run on more platforms?
- Checkmk runs on Web. Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Checkmk for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Checkmk best used for?
- Checkmk is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, system observability, enterprise compliance monitoring. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and system observability are not what Hookdeck is typically brought in for.
- What can Checkmk do that Hookdeck cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Checkmk: Is there a free version of Checkmk?
Yes, Checkmk Community edition is free forever and supports up to approximately 100 hosts for basic infrastructure monitoring with no cost.
SourceHookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Checkmk: How does Checkmk calculate pricing by host count?
Checkmk uses service-based pricing where each monitored aspect (file system, hardware sensor, switch port, metric) counts as one service. On average, there are approximately 30 services per host.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Checkmk: What is the difference between Checkmk Pro and Ultimate tiers?
Pro tier at 190 EUR/month includes advanced analytics and 8x5 support, while Ultimate at 275 EUR/month adds full-stack observability, advanced compliance features, and upgradable 24/7 support.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Checkmk: Does Checkmk offer a managed SaaS option?
Yes, Checkmk CloudAI is a fully managed SaaS tier at 240 EUR/month with 99.5% uptime SLA and support for up to 50000 services.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Checkmk vs Asana
- Checkmk vs ClickUp
- Checkmk vs Figma
- Checkmk vs Linear
- Checkmk vs Sentry
- Checkmk vs Nagios XI
- Checkmk vs Eclipse
- Checkmk vs Site24x7
- Checkmk vs Zabbix Cloud
- Checkmk vs Kubernetes
- Checkmk vs PostHog
- Checkmk vs Redis
- Checkmk vs UptimeRobot
- Checkmk vs Vercel
- Checkmk vs Zeta
- Checkmk vs CloudAMQP
- Checkmk vs Dropbox
- Checkmk vs Jitsu
- Checkmk vs Spacelift
- Checkmk vs Garden
- Checkmk vs Webpack
- Checkmk vs Backstage
- Checkmk vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Checkmk vs Dagger
- Checkmk vs Okteto
- Checkmk vs Visual Studio Code
- Checkmk vs Daytona
- Checkmk vs Harness
- Checkmk vs Ansible
- Checkmk vs Argo CD
- Checkmk vs Atlantis
- Checkmk vs Blacksmith
- Checkmk vs Coder
- Hookdeck vs Asana
- Hookdeck vs ClickUp
- Hookdeck vs Figma
- Hookdeck vs Linear
- Hookdeck vs Sentry
- Hookdeck vs Nagios XI
- Hookdeck vs Eclipse
- Hookdeck vs Site24x7
- Hookdeck vs Zabbix Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Kubernetes
- Hookdeck vs PostHog
- Hookdeck vs Redis
- Hookdeck vs UptimeRobot
- Hookdeck vs Vercel
- Hookdeck vs Zeta
- Hookdeck vs CloudAMQP
- Hookdeck vs Dropbox
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Visual Studio Code
- Hookdeck vs Daytona
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs Ansible
- Hookdeck vs Argo CD
- Hookdeck vs Atlantis
- Hookdeck vs Blacksmith
- Hookdeck vs Coder
