Technology · head to head
CloudAMQP vs Hookdeck

CloudAMQP
Technology
Managed RabbitMQ and LavinMQ clusters, hosted and fully managed
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudAMQP free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month; Hookdeck pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudAMQP and Hookdeck actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudAMQP
Nothing recorded that Hookdeck does not also cover.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudAMQP
- Message queue servicesnot Hookdeck
- Message brokers for distributed systemsnot Hookdeck
- RabbitMQ and LavinMQ hostingnot Hookdeck
- Asynchronous task processingnot Hookdeck
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot CloudAMQP
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot CloudAMQP
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot CloudAMQP
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot CloudAMQP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudAMQP
- Free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month
- Free tier connection limits are restrictive: 20-40
- Multi-tenant plans have queue limits (200-2,000 max)
- Dedicated plans expensive at scale: up to $14,995-$17,495/month
- Extra disk space add-on at $0.35/month per GB may add significant cost
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone.
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once.
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead.
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudAMQP
Free- LavinMQ - Loyal Lemming (Free)Free
- 2 million messages per month
- 40 connection limit
- 200 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Little Lemur (Free)Free
- 1 million messages per month
- 20 connection limit
- 100 queue maximum
- LavinMQ - Elegant Ermine$19/month
- 20 million messages per month
- 200 connections
- 2,000 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Tough Tiger$19/month
- 10 million messages per month
- 100 connections
- 1,000 queue maximum
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/month
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/month
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudAMQP or Hookdeck better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudAMQP starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudAMQP or Hookdeck?
- CloudAMQP starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free.
- Does CloudAMQP or Hookdeck run on more platforms?
- CloudAMQP runs on Web. Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use CloudAMQP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudAMQP best used for?
- CloudAMQP is most often used for message queue services, message brokers for distributed systems, rabbitmq and lavinmq hosting, asynchronous task processing. Of those, message queue services and message brokers for distributed systems are not what Hookdeck is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudAMQP do that Hookdeck cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudAMQP: Does CloudAMQP offer free plans?
Yes, CloudAMQP offers free tiers: LavinMQ Loyal Lemming with 2M messages/month, and RabbitMQ Little Lemur with 1M messages/month. Both include connection and queue limits.
SourceHookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
CloudAMQP: What is the cheapest paid plan?
Both LavinMQ Elegant Ermine and RabbitMQ Tough Tiger cost $19/month. LavinMQ includes 20M messages/month with 200 connections; RabbitMQ includes 10M messages/month with 100 connections.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
CloudAMQP: How are messages charged on CloudAMQP?
CloudAMQP plans include monthly message quotas. All plans are charged on a per-second basis with monthly billing cycles.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
CloudAMQP: What add-ons are available?
CloudAMQP offers Virtual Private Cloud add-on at $99/month, and extra disk space at $0.35/month per GB (25-2,000 GB available).
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudAMQP vs Asana
- CloudAMQP vs ClickUp
- CloudAMQP vs Figma
- CloudAMQP vs Linear
- CloudAMQP vs Confluent Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs MongoDB Atlas
- CloudAMQP vs Zabbix Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Alkami
- CloudAMQP vs Sentry
- CloudAMQP vs Dropbox
- CloudAMQP vs Jenkins
- CloudAMQP vs Checkmk
- CloudAMQP vs Aha!
- CloudAMQP vs Attio
- CloudAMQP vs Canny
- CloudAMQP vs Close
- CloudAMQP vs Coda
- CloudAMQP vs Drift
- CloudAMQP vs Jitsu
- CloudAMQP vs Spacelift
- CloudAMQP vs Garden
- CloudAMQP vs Webpack
- CloudAMQP vs Backstage
- CloudAMQP vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- CloudAMQP vs Dagger
- CloudAMQP vs Okteto
- CloudAMQP vs Visual Studio Code
- CloudAMQP vs Daytona
- CloudAMQP vs Harness
- CloudAMQP vs Ansible
- CloudAMQP vs Argo CD
- CloudAMQP vs Atlantis
- CloudAMQP vs Blacksmith
- CloudAMQP vs Coder
- Hookdeck vs Asana
- Hookdeck vs ClickUp
- Hookdeck vs Figma
- Hookdeck vs Linear
- Hookdeck vs Confluent Cloud
- Hookdeck vs MongoDB Atlas
- Hookdeck vs Zabbix Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Alkami
- Hookdeck vs Sentry
- Hookdeck vs Dropbox
- Hookdeck vs Jenkins
- Hookdeck vs Checkmk
- Hookdeck vs Aha!
- Hookdeck vs Attio
- Hookdeck vs Canny
- Hookdeck vs Close
- Hookdeck vs Coda
- Hookdeck vs Drift
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Visual Studio Code
- Hookdeck vs Daytona
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs Ansible
- Hookdeck vs Argo CD
- Hookdeck vs Atlantis
- Hookdeck vs Blacksmith
- Hookdeck vs Coder
