Government · head to head
CentralSquare Asset Management vs Sigstore

CentralSquare Asset Management
Government
Public sector enterprise asset management, sold for years as Lucity
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Sigstore has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CentralSquare Asset Management the Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.; Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- They diverge on capability: CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Sigstore covers Fulcio.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CentralSquare Asset Management and Sigstore actually diverge.
| Attribute | CentralSquare Asset Management | Sigstore |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, public instance free to use |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CentralSquare Asset Management
- Esri ArcGIS integration
- Public works asset breadth
- Citizen request intake
- Condition assessment
- Inspections
- Suite integration
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- A city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheetsnot Sigstore
- A county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programmenot Sigstore
- A public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keyingnot Sigstore
- A municipality already running CentralSquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration projectnot Sigstore
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot CentralSquare Asset Management
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- The Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.
- CentralSquare is private-equity owned and grew by acquisition, so asset management competes for development attention against public safety and finance products with larger revenue, and its roadmap is not independently controlled.
- Pricing is unpublished and quoted per municipality, and asset management is often presented alongside other suite modules, so a department must work to get a clean, unbundled number it can defend at council.
- Esri ArcGIS is effectively a prerequisite for the spatial capability that makes the product worth buying, and that licence is a separate cost the software quote will not include.
- It is North America focused, aligned to United States municipal practice, funding structures and regulatory programmes, which limits its fit for local authorities elsewhere.
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Pricing, plan by plan
CentralSquare Asset Management
On request- CentralSquare Asset Management$undefined/year
- Subscription or on-premise licensing, quoted per municipality
- Priced on population, module selection and user counts
- Esri ArcGIS licensing purchased separately
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Which should you pick?
Choose CentralSquare Asset Management if
- You need esri arcgis integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want public works asset breadth.
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Questions people ask
- Is CentralSquare Asset Management or Sigstore better?
- Neither clearly leads. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and Sigstore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CentralSquare Asset Management or Sigstore?
- Sigstore has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CentralSquare Asset Management and Free for Sigstore.
- Does CentralSquare Asset Management or Sigstore run on more platforms?
- CentralSquare Asset Management runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise. Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Yes. Sigstore has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request.
- What is CentralSquare Asset Management best used for?
- CentralSquare Asset Management is most often used for a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets, a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme, a public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keying, a municipality already running centralsquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration project. Of those, a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets and a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme are not what Sigstore is typically brought in for.
- What can CentralSquare Asset Management do that Sigstore cannot?
- CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Public works asset breadth, Citizen request intake, Condition assessment. Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CentralSquare Asset Management: Can I still buy Lucity?
Not under that name alone. It is sold as CentralSquare Asset Management powered by Lucity, and quotes and contracts will use the CentralSquare name.
Sigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Do I need Esri?
In practice yes. The spatial asset handling that distinguishes the product depends on ArcGIS, licensed separately from Esri.
Sigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is it cloud only?
No. Both hosted subscription and on-premise deployment are available, which matters for municipalities with data residency or network policy constraints.
Sigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per municipality based on population, modules and users, usually through a public procurement process.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
More on CentralSquare Asset Management
Other head to heads
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs VUEWorks
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Euna Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs MyRec.com
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEOGOV
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SAP for Government
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OpenGov
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Technologies
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Laserfiche
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OnBase
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SeeClickFix
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs ShotSpotter
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Springbrook Software
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Vigilant Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Brazos
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Cosign
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Syft
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Logto
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Infisical
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Chainguard
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Ory
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OWASP ZAP
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Bitwarden
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Semgrep
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trivy
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs authentik
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Authelia
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Resolver
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Saviynt
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Securiti
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Speakeasy
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Sysdig
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Sigstore vs VUEWorks
- Sigstore vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Sigstore vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Sigstore vs Euna Solutions
- Sigstore vs MyRec.com
- Sigstore vs NEOGOV
- Sigstore vs SAP for Government
- Sigstore vs OpenGov
- Sigstore vs Tyler Technologies
- Sigstore vs Laserfiche
- Sigstore vs OnBase
- Sigstore vs SeeClickFix
- Sigstore vs ShotSpotter
- Sigstore vs Springbrook Software
- Sigstore vs Vigilant Solutions
- Sigstore vs Tyler Brazos
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
