Research · head to head
Castor EDC vs SurveyMonkey

Castor EDC
Research
Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SurveyMonkey has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Castor EDC nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.; SurveyMonkey team plans require minimum 3 users as baseline
- They diverge on capability: Castor EDC covers Browser-based study build, SurveyMonkey covers Survey builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Castor EDC and SurveyMonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | Castor EDC | SurveyMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Castor EDC
- Browser-based study build
- 21 CFR Part 11 workflows
- eConsent
- ePRO and surveys
- Randomisation
- Per-study licensing
- Grant-funded pricing paths
- Data export
Only in SurveyMonkey
- Survey builder
- Question bank
- Survey logic
- Multi-language surveys
- Mobile surveys
- Real-time results
- Data analysis tools
- Custom branding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Castor EDC
- An academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade EDC contract or a data management CROnot SurveyMonkey
- A medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with Part 11 audit trailsnot SurveyMonkey
- A multi-site registry that needs remote eConsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinicnot SurveyMonkey
- A biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissionednot SurveyMonkey
SurveyMonkey
- Market research and customer surveysnot Castor EDC
- Employee feedback and engagement trackingnot Castor EDC
- Data collection and analysisnot Castor EDC
- Customer satisfaction and NPS measurementsnot Castor EDC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Castor EDC
- Nothing is published: pricing is quoted only after a scoping call and protocol review, so budgeting a grant application means asking for a quote months before the study is funded and hoping the scope holds.
- Price scales on protocol complexity rather than a simple unit, so two studies with the same participant count can be quoted very differently and there is no public benchmark to argue against.
- Modules such as eConsent, ePRO and randomisation are quoted on top of the base platform, so the headline EDC figure is rarely the number that appears on the final proposal.
- It is deliberately lighter than the full sponsor suites, so a study that grows into a global registrational programme needing integrated CTMS, safety, IRT and full trial supply management will need additional systems and the interfaces between them.
- Regulatory responsibility does not transfer with the software: the platform supports Part 11 compliant workflows, but system validation for your intended use, SOPs and audit readiness remain your obligation and your cost, which sponsors new to EDC consistently underestimate.
SurveyMonkey
- Team plans require minimum 3 users as baseline
- Annual response limits enforced: 50,000 responses/year on Team Advantage, 100,000 on Team Premier
- Additional responses beyond annual limits charged at AED 0.50 per response
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and minimum 5 users
- Advanced features like multilingual surveys and phone support require Team Premier tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Castor EDC
On request- Castor EDC$undefined/year
- Priced per study on protocol complexity, duration, sites and modules
- 21 CFR Part 11 and ICH GCP workflows
- eConsent, ePRO and randomisation modules quoted separately
SurveyMonkey
Free- Team Advantage$99/month
- 50,000 responses per year
- Unlimited surveys and questions
- 3 user minimum
- Team Premier$240/month
- 100,000 responses per year
- All Team Advantage features
- White label branding
Which should you pick?
Choose Castor EDC if
- You need browser-based study build.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want 21 cfr part 11 workflows.
Choose SurveyMonkey if
- You need survey builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want question bank.
Questions people ask
- Is Castor EDC or SurveyMonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. Castor EDC starts at On request and SurveyMonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Castor EDC or SurveyMonkey?
- SurveyMonkey has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Castor EDC and Free for SurveyMonkey.
- Does Castor EDC or SurveyMonkey run on more platforms?
- Castor EDC runs on Web, iOS, Android. SurveyMonkey runs on Web.
- Can I use SurveyMonkey for free?
- Yes. SurveyMonkey has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Castor EDC starts at On request.
- What is Castor EDC best used for?
- Castor EDC is most often used for an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro, a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails, a multi-site registry that needs remote econsent because participants are recruited nationally rather than at a clinic, a biotech running a small phase two study that wants the database built by its own clinical team in weeks rather than commissioned. Of those, an academic hospital running an investigator-initiated trial that cannot fund a sponsor-grade edc contract or a data management cro and a medical device company collecting post-market clinical follow-up data with part 11 audit trails are not what SurveyMonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can Castor EDC do that SurveyMonkey cannot?
- Castor EDC covers Browser-based study build, 21 CFR Part 11 workflows, eConsent, ePRO and surveys. SurveyMonkey covers Survey builder, Question bank, Survey logic, Multi-language surveys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Castor EDC: Is there a free academic version?
No published free tier. There are academic, non-profit and grant-funded pricing paths, but each is quoted rather than self-service.
SurveyMonkey: How much does SurveyMonkey cost?
SurveyMonkey offers team plans starting at AED 99 per user per month for Team Advantage and AED 240 per user per month for Team Premier. Both plans require a minimum of 3 users. Billing can be monthly or annual.
SourceCastor EDC: Is it 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
It supports Part 11 compliant workflows with audit trails and electronic signatures. Validating the system for your specific use remains your responsibility.
SurveyMonkey: What are SurveyMonkey's overage fees?
SurveyMonkey charges AED 0.50 per additional response on paid plans beyond the annual limit included in each tier.
SourceCastor EDC: Do I need a programmer to build a study?
No. Case report forms are configured in the browser, which is the main reason academic groups adopt it.
Castor EDC: How long does a quote take?
Castor states a full pricing proposal within five business days of sharing the protocol.
Related pages
More on SurveyMonkey
Other head to heads
- Castor EDC vs Benchling
- Castor EDC vs LabVantage
- Castor EDC vs Sapio Sciences
- Castor EDC vs Medidata Rave
- Castor EDC vs REDCap
- Castor EDC vs Greenphire
- Castor EDC vs Florence eBinders
- Castor EDC vs Genedata
- Castor EDC vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Castor EDC vs LabArchives
- Castor EDC vs Aurelius
- Castor EDC vs Reduct
- Castor EDC vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- Castor EDC vs Paperpile
- Castor EDC vs Remesh
- Castor EDC vs Schrodinger
- Castor EDC vs Suzy
- Castor EDC vs Zappi
- Castor EDC vs GWI
- Castor EDC vs Attest
- Castor EDC vs Mouseflow
- Castor EDC vs Contentsquare
- Castor EDC vs SurveySparrow
- Castor EDC vs Obsidian
- Castor EDC vs Dovetail
- Castor EDC vs Valispace
- Castor EDC vs Zotero
- Castor EDC vs Mendeley
- SurveyMonkey vs Benchling
- SurveyMonkey vs LabVantage
- SurveyMonkey vs Sapio Sciences
- SurveyMonkey vs Medidata Rave
- SurveyMonkey vs REDCap
- SurveyMonkey vs Greenphire
- SurveyMonkey vs Florence eBinders
- SurveyMonkey vs Genedata
- SurveyMonkey vs Wolfram Mathematica
- SurveyMonkey vs LabArchives
- SurveyMonkey vs Aurelius
- SurveyMonkey vs Reduct
- SurveyMonkey vs OpenEye, Cadence Molecular Sciences
- SurveyMonkey vs Paperpile
- SurveyMonkey vs Remesh
- SurveyMonkey vs Schrodinger
- SurveyMonkey vs Suzy
- SurveyMonkey vs Zappi
- SurveyMonkey vs GWI
- SurveyMonkey vs Attest
- SurveyMonkey vs Mouseflow
- SurveyMonkey vs Contentsquare
- SurveyMonkey vs SurveySparrow
- SurveyMonkey vs Obsidian
- SurveyMonkey vs Dovetail
- SurveyMonkey vs Valispace
- SurveyMonkey vs Zotero
- SurveyMonkey vs Mendeley

