Databases · head to head
Convex vs Firestore

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Firestore
Databases
Flexible, scalable NoSQL cloud database from Firebase
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Firestore the no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Firestore covers Document Model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Firestore actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Firestore
- Document Model
- Real-time Updates
- Offline Support
- ACID Transactions
- Expressive Queries
- Multi-region
- Security Rules
- Firebase Auth
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Firestore
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Firestore
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Firestore
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Firestore
Firestore
- Storing structured application data with realtime listenersnot Convex
- Backing mobile and web apps with a serverless document databasenot Convex
- Building offline first apps that sync when connectivity returnsnot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Firestore
- The no-cost Spark plan caps Standard edition at 50,000 document reads, 20,000 writes and 20,000 deletes per day
- The Spark plan caps storage at 1 GiB and network egress at 10 GiB per month
- Charging is per document read, so a query returning many documents bills for every one of them
- Going beyond the free thresholds requires the pay as you go Blaze plan billed at Google Cloud rates with no fixed monthly ceiling
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Firestore
Free- SparkFree
- 1GB storage
- 50K reads/day
- 20K writes/day
- BlazeFree
- Pay as you go
- Unlimited operations
- Multi-region
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Firestore if
- You need document model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter.
- You also want real-time updates.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Firestore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Firestore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Firestore?
- Convex starts at Free and Firestore at Free.
- Does Convex or Firestore run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Firestore runs on Web, Ios, Android, Flutter.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Firestore is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Firestore cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Firestore covers Document Model, Real-time Updates, Offline Support, ACID Transactions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Firestore: What are the free limits on Cloud Firestore?
The Spark Plan includes 1 GiB of stored data, 50,000 reads per day, 20,000 writes per day, and 20,000 deletes per day at no cost.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Firestore: What happens when I exceed the Spark Plan free tier?
Exceeding the free tier requires upgrading to the Blaze Plan, which bills based on actual usage through Google Cloud pricing. Charges apply for reads, writes, deletes, and data storage.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Firestore: Can I use Firestore without a credit card?
Yes, you can use the Spark Plan indefinitely without a credit card. To use the Blaze Plan (pay-as-you-go), a credit card is required.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Firestore: Is there a trial period for Cloud Firestore?
No trial period is specified. The Spark Plan free tier serves as the trial, with no time limit.
SourceConvex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Couchbase
- Convex vs CouchDB
- Convex vs RavenDB
- Convex vs Estuary
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs OpenSearch
- Convex vs Qdrant
- Convex vs SingleStore
- Convex vs TiDB
- Convex vs Tinybird
- Convex vs Typesense
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Apache Kafka
- Firestore vs PostgreSQL
- Firestore vs Airtable
- Firestore vs Cockroach Labs
- Firestore vs Amazon Aurora
- Firestore vs Readyset
- Firestore vs FaunaDB
- Firestore vs LanceDB
- Firestore vs Xata
- Firestore vs Materialize
- Firestore vs BigQuery
- Firestore vs dbt
- Firestore vs Apache Doris
- Firestore vs ArangoDB
- Firestore vs Canary Labs
- Firestore vs Chroma
- Firestore vs Cloudinary
- Firestore vs DynamoDB
- Firestore vs Apache Solr
- Firestore vs Couchbase
- Firestore vs CouchDB
- Firestore vs RavenDB
- Firestore vs Estuary
- Firestore vs ClickHouse
- Firestore vs OpenSearch
- Firestore vs Qdrant
- Firestore vs SingleStore
- Firestore vs TiDB
- Firestore vs Tinybird
- Firestore vs Typesense
- Firestore vs Apache Pinot
- Firestore vs Apache Kafka
