Databases · head to head
ClickHouse vs Convex

ClickHouse
Databases
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClickHouse limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems; Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- They diverge on capability: ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Convex covers Reactive queries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClickHouse and Convex actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClickHouse | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker) | Web |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClickHouse
- Column-oriented Storage
- Real-time Analytics
- SQL Support
- Linear Scalability
- Data Compression
- Vectorized Query Execution
- Approximate Calculations
- Kafka
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClickHouse
- Business intelligencenot Convex
- Data warehousingnot Convex
- Real-time analyticsnot Convex
- Reportingnot Convex
- Machine learningnot Convex
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot ClickHouse
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot ClickHouse
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot ClickHouse
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot ClickHouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClickHouse
- Limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems
- Requires upfront schema design discipline with MergeTree engine choices and sort/partition keys
- Experimental vector search support, not production-ready for vector operations
- Different query syntax from standard SQL requiring migration planning
- Limited JOIN capabilities compared to traditional relational databases
- Migration complexity with 2-4 weeks estimated for data type mapping and query translation
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Pricing, plan by plan
ClickHouse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ClickHouse review.
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose ClickHouse if
- You need column-oriented storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker).
- You also want real-time analytics.
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Questions people ask
- Is ClickHouse or Convex better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClickHouse starts at Free and Convex at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClickHouse or Convex?
- ClickHouse starts at Free and Convex at Free.
- Does ClickHouse or Convex run on more platforms?
- ClickHouse runs on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker). Convex runs on Web.
- Can I use ClickHouse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClickHouse best used for?
- ClickHouse is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Convex is typically brought in for.
- What can ClickHouse do that Convex cannot?
- ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Real-time Analytics, SQL Support, Linear Scalability. Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClickHouse: What is ClickHouse best used for?
ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads on large datasets. It excels at fast aggregations and queries, being 10-100x faster than PostgreSQL on large aggregations.
SourceConvex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
ClickHouse: Does ClickHouse support transactions?
ClickHouse has limited transaction support and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations. It is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strict ACID guarantees.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
ClickHouse: How does ClickHouse compare to PostgreSQL?
ClickHouse is 10-100x faster for analytics but PostgreSQL is better for transactional workloads. Many teams use both: PostgreSQL for writes via MaterializedPostgreSQL replication to ClickHouse for analytics.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Convex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ClickHouse vs Apache Druid
- ClickHouse vs SingleStore
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
- ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
- ClickHouse vs Tinybird
- ClickHouse vs Timeplus
- ClickHouse vs StarRocks
- ClickHouse vs Presto
- ClickHouse vs DuckDB
- ClickHouse vs Valkey
- ClickHouse vs ArangoDB
- ClickHouse vs Canary Labs
- ClickHouse vs Chroma
- ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot
- ClickHouse vs Apache Doris
- ClickHouse vs Cassandra
- ClickHouse vs Apache Solr
- ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse vs Airtable
- ClickHouse vs Cockroach Labs
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Aurora
- ClickHouse vs Readyset
- ClickHouse vs FaunaDB
- ClickHouse vs LanceDB
- ClickHouse vs Xata
- ClickHouse vs Materialize
- ClickHouse vs BigQuery
- ClickHouse vs dbt
- ClickHouse vs Cloudinary
- ClickHouse vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Druid
- Convex vs SingleStore
- Convex vs Amazon Redshift
- Convex vs TimescaleDB
- Convex vs Tinybird
- Convex vs Timeplus
- Convex vs StarRocks
- Convex vs Presto
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs Valkey
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs Cassandra
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
