Databases · head to head
Convex vs Couchbase

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Couchbase the free tier is a single node with 8 GB of storage and forum support only
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Couchbase covers JSON Document Model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Couchbase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Couchbase
- JSON Document Model
- SQL++ Query
- Full-text Search
- Eventing
- Analytics
- Mobile Sync
- Multi-dimensional Scaling
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Couchbase
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Couchbase
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Couchbase
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Couchbase
Couchbase
- Running a distributed NoSQL document database as a managed servicenot Convex
- Mobile sync and offline first applications backed by a cloud databasenot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Couchbase
- The free tier is a single node with 8 GB of storage and forum support only
- Node rates are hourly and quoted as starting figures, from $0.15 an hour on Basic to $0.49 on Enterprise
- The Developer Pro and Enterprise plans require 3 nodes, so the hourly rate multiplies before any usage
- Backup storage is billed separately at $0.07 per GB a month, and analytics backups at $0.14
- Support response time is a plan feature, at 8 hours on Developer Pro against 30 minutes on Enterprise
- AI and analytics run as separately priced planes at up to $0.86 an hour per node
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Couchbase
Free- CommunityFree
- Full features
- Community support
- Self-managed
- Capella FreeFree
- Managed service
- Limited resources
- Cloud hosted
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Couchbase if
- You need json document model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want sql++ query.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Couchbase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Couchbase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Couchbase?
- Convex starts at Free and Couchbase at Free.
- Does Convex or Couchbase run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Couchbase runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Couchbase is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Couchbase cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Couchbase covers JSON Document Model, SQL++ Query, Full-text Search, Eventing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Couchbase: Does Couchbase offer a free tier?
Yes, Couchbase offers a free tier option. Users can start for free from the main website.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Couchbase: How do I access Couchbase pricing details?
Couchbase maintains a dedicated pricing page, but detailed tier information and costs are not available on the homepage. You can visit the pricing page or contact their sales team.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Convex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Cassandra
- Convex vs YugabyteDB
- Convex vs RavenDB
- Convex vs Elasticsearch
- Convex vs Dgraph
- Convex vs ScyllaDB
- Convex vs Oracle Database
- Convex vs TimescaleDB
- Convex vs Turso
- Convex vs CouchDB
- Convex vs Amazon RDS
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Amazon Redshift
- Couchbase vs PostgreSQL
- Couchbase vs Airtable
- Couchbase vs Cockroach Labs
- Couchbase vs Amazon Aurora
- Couchbase vs Readyset
- Couchbase vs FaunaDB
- Couchbase vs LanceDB
- Couchbase vs Xata
- Couchbase vs Materialize
- Couchbase vs BigQuery
- Couchbase vs dbt
- Couchbase vs Apache Doris
- Couchbase vs ArangoDB
- Couchbase vs Canary Labs
- Couchbase vs Chroma
- Couchbase vs Cloudinary
- Couchbase vs DynamoDB
- Couchbase vs Apache Solr
- Couchbase vs Cassandra
- Couchbase vs YugabyteDB
- Couchbase vs RavenDB
- Couchbase vs Elasticsearch
- Couchbase vs Dgraph
- Couchbase vs ScyllaDB
- Couchbase vs Oracle Database
- Couchbase vs TimescaleDB
- Couchbase vs Turso
- Couchbase vs CouchDB
- Couchbase vs Amazon RDS
- Couchbase vs Apache Pinot
- Couchbase vs Amazon Redshift

