Construction · head to head
Buildots vs Topcon MAGNET

Buildots
Construction
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Topcon MAGNET
Construction
Field, office and cloud software for surveying and civil construction, built around Topcon instruments
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildots tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.; Topcon MAGNET mAGNET is built around Topcon and Sokkia hardware, so a firm running mixed instrument brands will not get the field workflows it expects and is better served by manufacturer-independent field software.
- They diverge on capability: Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Topcon MAGNET covers MAGNET Field.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildots and Topcon MAGNET actually diverge.
| Attribute | Buildots | Topcon MAGNET |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, Android, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildots
- Hard hat 360 capture
- Model to as-built comparison
- Per activity progress scoring
- Programme deviation alerts
- Delay forecasting
- Visual evidence trail
- Subcontractor performance reporting
Only in Topcon MAGNET
- MAGNET Field
- MAGNET Office
- MAGNET Enterprise
- Machine control model preparation
- Mass haul and earthwork
- Point layout and stakeout
- Live field to office link
- Standard format exchange
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildots
- A residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle timenot Topcon MAGNET
- A hospital or data centre fit-out where MEP first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every monthnot Topcon MAGNET
- A developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment applicationnot Topcon MAGNET
- A contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumptionnot Topcon MAGNET
Topcon MAGNET
- A civil contractor running Topcon grade control that needs design models prepared and pushed to machines from one environmentnot Buildots
- A survey crew doing construction layout with Topcon total stations and wanting field data to reach the office without a memory cardnot Buildots
- An earthworks estimator producing takeoff quantities and mass haul plans from engineering drawingsnot Buildots
- A firm standardising on one manufacturer end to end to reduce the number of software packages its crews have to learnnot Buildots
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildots
- Tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.
- The data only arrives if someone walks the site every week with the camera, so coverage decays quietly when the site team is under pressure, exactly when the reporting is most needed.
- Pricing is per project rather than per seat and includes hardware, so a contractor cannot roll it out cheaply across a portfolio of small jobs and it is uneconomic below a certain project value.
- It reads interior fit-out and repetitive vertical work far better than structure, groundworks or external envelope, so a large fraction of a project's programme is outside what it can score.
- Making progress objective creates commercial friction with subcontractors whose valuations have historically been negotiated, and contractors who deploy it without addressing that in the subcontract get pushback rather than adoption.
Topcon MAGNET
- MAGNET is built around Topcon and Sokkia hardware, so a firm running mixed instrument brands will not get the field workflows it expects and is better served by manufacturer-independent field software.
- Topcon does not publish a rate card and sells through dealers, so two customers can pay materially different prices for the same licences depending on region and negotiation.
- Cloud connectivity through MAGNET Enterprise is commonly bundled for the first year and then charged, which surprises firms that budgeted only for the licence.
- Office capability is spread across modules and disciplines rather than sold as one product, so getting from data collection to machine control model preparation can require more than one purchase.
- The office desktop software is Windows only and the wider line has been reorganised more than once, so buyers should confirm which specific product name their dealer is quoting and how long it will be supported.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildots
On request- Buildots$undefined/year
- Priced per project by size and duration
- Camera hardware included in the engagement
- Model onboarding and setup quoted separately
Topcon MAGNET
On request- MAGNET Field$undefined/year
- Data collector licence
- Sold through Topcon dealers
- Annual service plan renewals available
- MAGNET Office$undefined/year
- Desktop licence with modules by discipline
- Includes cloud connectivity for a first year
- Renewal quoted separately
- MAGNET Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud project storage and field to office exchange
- Subscription renewed annually
- Bundled initially with Office licences
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildots if
- You need hard hat 360 capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want model to as-built comparison.
Choose Topcon MAGNET if
- You need magnet field.
- You work on Windows, Android, Web.
- You also want magnet office.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildots or Topcon MAGNET better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildots starts at On request and Topcon MAGNET at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildots or Topcon MAGNET?
- Buildots starts at On request and Topcon MAGNET at On request.
- Does Buildots or Topcon MAGNET run on more platforms?
- Buildots runs on Web, iOS, Android. Topcon MAGNET runs on Windows, Android, Web.
- What is Buildots best used for?
- Buildots is most often used for a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time, a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month, a developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment application, a contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumption. Of those, a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time and a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month are not what Topcon MAGNET is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildots do that Topcon MAGNET cannot?
- Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Model to as-built comparison, Per activity progress scoring, Programme deviation alerts. Topcon MAGNET covers MAGNET Field, MAGNET Office, MAGNET Enterprise, Machine control model preparation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildots: What does Buildots cost?
It is quoted per project based on size, duration and scope, with camera hardware included. Nothing is published.
Topcon MAGNET: Does MAGNET work with Trimble or Leica instruments?
Not as a practical daily workflow. It exchanges standard file formats but the field software is designed for Topcon and Sokkia hardware.
Buildots: Do I need a BIM model?
Yes. The system scores progress by comparing captured conditions against model objects, so the model quality sets the ceiling on accuracy.
Topcon MAGNET: Is pricing published?
No. MAGNET is sold through Topcon dealers with quotes varying by region and configuration.
Buildots: What kind of projects suit it?
Repetitive vertical work with heavy interior fit-out. Civil, groundworks and external envelope are poorly covered.
Topcon MAGNET: Is the cloud service included?
Typically for a first year with a licence, then renewable as a paid subscription.
Buildots: Who does the site walks?
Your own site team, typically once or twice a week. There is no Buildots operator on site.
Topcon MAGNET: Can I get my data out at project closeout?
Yes, through LandXML, DXF and standard survey exchange formats, though field-specific configuration does not transfer to a competitor.
Related pages
More on Topcon MAGNET
Other head to heads
- Buildots vs Openspace
- Buildots vs Procore
- Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Buildots vs Dalux
- Buildots vs RIB CostX
- Buildots vs Autodesk Revit
- Buildots vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Buildots vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Buildots vs Togal.AI
- Buildots vs BricsCAD BIM
- Buildots vs Cubit Estimating
- Buildots vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Buildots vs Viewpoint Vista
- Buildots vs Briq
- Buildots vs Buildertrend
- Buildots vs ConstructConnect
- Buildots vs BuildingConnected
- Buildots vs Trimble
- Buildots vs Assignar
- Buildots vs HCSS
- Buildots vs Adaptive
- Buildots vs Clearstory
- Buildots vs Kojo
- Buildots vs Propeller Aero
- Buildots vs Trunk Tools
- Buildots vs eSUB
- Buildots vs Microsoft Project
- Buildots vs Egnyte
- Buildots vs B2W Estimate
- Topcon MAGNET vs Openspace
- Topcon MAGNET vs Procore
- Topcon MAGNET vs Reconstruct
- Topcon MAGNET vs Dalux
- Topcon MAGNET vs RIB CostX
- Topcon MAGNET vs Autodesk Revit
- Topcon MAGNET vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Topcon MAGNET vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Topcon MAGNET vs Togal.AI
- Topcon MAGNET vs BricsCAD BIM
- Topcon MAGNET vs Cubit Estimating
- Topcon MAGNET vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Topcon MAGNET vs Viewpoint Vista
- Topcon MAGNET vs Briq
- Topcon MAGNET vs Buildertrend
- Topcon MAGNET vs ConstructConnect
- Topcon MAGNET vs BuildingConnected
- Topcon MAGNET vs Trimble
- Topcon MAGNET vs Assignar
- Topcon MAGNET vs HCSS
- Topcon MAGNET vs Adaptive
- Topcon MAGNET vs Clearstory
- Topcon MAGNET vs Kojo
- Topcon MAGNET vs Propeller Aero
- Topcon MAGNET vs Trunk Tools
- Topcon MAGNET vs eSUB
- Topcon MAGNET vs Microsoft Project
- Topcon MAGNET vs Egnyte
- Topcon MAGNET vs B2W Estimate
