Spreadsheets · head to head
Budibase vs VerneMQ

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Budibase cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Budibase and VerneMQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Budibase
- Drag-and-drop builder
- Database design
- REST API
- User management
- Custom code
- Workflows
- Responsive design
- 100+ integrations
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Budibase
- Building internal tools over existing databasesnot VerneMQ
- Self-hosting an open source low-code platformnot VerneMQ
- Admin panels and CRUD apps for operations teamsnot VerneMQ
- Automations triggered by data changesnot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Budibase
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Budibase
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Budibase
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Budibase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Budibase
- Cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business
- Creator seats are limited and cost $50 each beyond the included count
- End users are $5 per user per month on top of the plan
- Custom branding needs Premium, SSO enforcement and environment variables need Business, and audit logs are Enterprise only
- Log retention is tiered from 1 day on Pro to 365 days on Enterprise
- Monthly billing costs 20 percent more than annual
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Budibase
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- FreeFree
- Cloud hosted
- Limited features
- Premium$50/month
- Advanced features
- Email support
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Budibase if
- You need drag-and-drop builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want database design.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is Budibase or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Budibase starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Budibase or VerneMQ?
- Budibase starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does Budibase or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- Budibase runs on Web, Self-hosted. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Budibase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Budibase best used for?
- Budibase is most often used for building internal tools over existing databases, self-hosting an open source low-code platform, admin panels and crud apps for operations teams, automations triggered by data changes. Of those, building internal tools over existing databases and self-hosting an open source low-code platform are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Budibase do that VerneMQ cannot?
- Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder, Database design, REST API, User management. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Budibase: What happens if I exceed the monthly action limit on my plan?
Actions are hard monthly limits. Once you reach the limit on your plan (5K for Pro, 20K for Premium, 250K for Business), you must upgrade to a higher tier to continue using the service.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
Budibase: Is there a charge for additional users beyond what is included in my plan?
Yes. Each plan includes a limited number of creators (1 for Pro, expandable for Premium, 3 for Business), but end users are charged at $5 per user per month as an add-on.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
Budibase: How much extra do I pay if I choose monthly billing instead of yearly?
Monthly billing costs 20% more than the yearly equivalent. For example, paying monthly for Pro at $19/month equals $228 per year, versus $190 per year on a yearly subscription.
SourceVerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
Budibase: Can I try Budibase before committing to a paid plan?
Yes. All paid cloud plans include a 14-day free trial. The open source version is also available free with unlimited actions and unlimited users, though with community support only.
SourceVerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
Budibase: Does the free open source plan include the same features as paid plans?
The open source plan includes unlimited actions, unlimited apps, automations, agents, and users, but support is community-only rather than through Budibase directly. Paid plans add features like AI credits, custom branding, backups, and email or priority support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Budibase vs Tableau
- Budibase vs Metabase
- Budibase vs Looker
- Budibase vs Redash
- Budibase vs Rowy
- Budibase vs Baserow
- Budibase vs NocoDB
- Budibase vs Cube Software
- Budibase vs Mathesar
- Budibase vs SeaTable
- Budibase vs Fibery
- Budibase vs Apache Superset
- Budibase vs Quadratic
- Budibase vs Sigma Computing
- Budibase vs Teable
- Budibase vs EMQX
- Budibase vs RabbitMQ
- Budibase vs NATS
- Budibase vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Budibase vs Canary Labs
- Budibase vs Solace PubSub+
- Budibase vs TimescaleDB
- Budibase vs Apache Pulsar
- Budibase vs Presto
- Budibase vs StarRocks
- Budibase vs Timeplus
- Budibase vs PostgreSQL
- Budibase vs Chroma
- Budibase vs Cloudinary
- Budibase vs Convex
- Budibase vs Dgraph
- Budibase vs Dragonfly
- Budibase vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs Tableau
- VerneMQ vs Metabase
- VerneMQ vs Looker
- VerneMQ vs Redash
- VerneMQ vs Rowy
- VerneMQ vs Baserow
- VerneMQ vs NocoDB
- VerneMQ vs Cube Software
- VerneMQ vs Mathesar
- VerneMQ vs SeaTable
- VerneMQ vs Fibery
- VerneMQ vs Apache Superset
- VerneMQ vs Quadratic
- VerneMQ vs Sigma Computing
- VerneMQ vs Teable
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio

