Spreadsheets · head to head
Apache Superset vs VerneMQ

Apache Superset
Spreadsheets
Modern data exploration and visualization platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Superset no commercial pricing; open-source project; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: Apache Superset covers 40+ Visualizations, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Superset and VerneMQ actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Superset | VerneMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Self-hosted, Docker | Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes |
| Category | Spreadsheets | Databases |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Superset
- 40+ Visualizations
- SQL IDE
- Semantic Layer
- Caching
- Security
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Presto
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Superset
- Self-service analyticsnot VerneMQ
- Data explorationnot VerneMQ
- Ad-hoc reportingnot VerneMQ
- Collaborative analysisnot VerneMQ
- Embedded analyticsnot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Apache Superset
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Apache Superset
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Apache Superset
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Apache Superset
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Superset
- No commercial pricing; open-source project
- Commercial hosting available via Preset.io (separate vendor)
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Superset
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full Features
- Self-hosted
- Community Support
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Superset if
- You need 40+ visualizations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want sql ide.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Superset or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Superset starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Superset or VerneMQ?
- Apache Superset starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does Apache Superset or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- Apache Superset runs on Web, Self-hosted, Docker. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Apache Superset for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Superset best used for?
- Apache Superset is most often used for self-service analytics, data exploration, ad-hoc reporting, collaborative analysis. Of those, self-service analytics and data exploration are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Superset do that VerneMQ cannot?
- Apache Superset covers 40+ Visualizations, SQL IDE, Semantic Layer, Caching. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Superset: What does Apache Superset cost?
Apache Superset is open-source software available free under the Apache 2.0 license. There are no licensing costs, subscription fees, or per-seat charges for using Superset itself.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
Apache Superset: Is there a paid version of Apache Superset?
Apache Superset itself is free and open-source. Preset.io offers commercial Superset hosting with premium support, but this is a separate vendor service, not an official paid tier of Superset.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
VerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
VerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
Related pages
More on Apache Superset
Other head to heads
- Apache Superset vs Metabase
- Apache Superset vs Tableau
- Apache Superset vs Looker
- Apache Superset vs Redash
- Apache Superset vs Equals
- Apache Superset vs Sigma Computing
- Apache Superset vs Fibery
- Apache Superset vs Baserow
- Apache Superset vs NocoDB
- Apache Superset vs Budibase
- Apache Superset vs Google Sheets
- Apache Superset vs Numbers
- Apache Superset vs SeaTable
- Apache Superset vs Teable
- Apache Superset vs APITable
- Apache Superset vs Coefficient
- Apache Superset vs Cube Software
- Apache Superset vs EMQX
- Apache Superset vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Superset vs NATS
- Apache Superset vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Superset vs Canary Labs
- Apache Superset vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Superset vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Superset vs Apache Pulsar
- Apache Superset vs Presto
- Apache Superset vs StarRocks
- Apache Superset vs Timeplus
- Apache Superset vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Superset vs Chroma
- Apache Superset vs Cloudinary
- Apache Superset vs Convex
- Apache Superset vs Dgraph
- Apache Superset vs Dragonfly
- Apache Superset vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs Metabase
- VerneMQ vs Tableau
- VerneMQ vs Looker
- VerneMQ vs Redash
- VerneMQ vs Equals
- VerneMQ vs Sigma Computing
- VerneMQ vs Fibery
- VerneMQ vs Baserow
- VerneMQ vs NocoDB
- VerneMQ vs Budibase
- VerneMQ vs Google Sheets
- VerneMQ vs Numbers
- VerneMQ vs SeaTable
- VerneMQ vs Teable
- VerneMQ vs APITable
- VerneMQ vs Coefficient
- VerneMQ vs Cube Software
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio
