Softwr

API Management · head to head

Akana vs Bruno

Akana logo

Akana

API Management

Enterprise API lifecycle management platform

From
$2500/monthly
Rated
-
Bruno logo

Bruno

API Management

Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Bruno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
  • They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Bruno covers API Testing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Akana and Bruno actually diverge.

Attributes where Akana and Bruno differ
AttributeAkanaBruno
Starting price$2500/monthlyFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionopen-source
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsCloud, On-premise, HybridWindows, MacOS, Linux
Founded20012022

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Akana

  • API Lifecycle Management
  • API Security
  • Governance Controls
  • OAuth
  • SAML
  • LDAP
  • Active Directory
  • Cloud support

Only in Bruno

  • API Testing
  • Environment management
  • Git-friendly storage
  • GitHub
  • Git repositories
  • Local file system
  • Windows support
  • MacOS support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Akana

  • API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Bruno
  • Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Bruno
  • Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Bruno
  • Developer portal and API monetisationnot Bruno
  • Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Bruno

Bruno

  • Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Akana
  • Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Akana
  • Offline API development without an accountnot Akana
  • Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Akana

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Akana

  • Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
  • Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered

Bruno

  • Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
  • OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
  • SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
  • Private workspaces are a paid feature
  • Advertised prices are annual rates

Pricing, plan by plan

Akana

$2500/monthly
  • Professional$2500/monthly
    • API Gateway
    • Developer Portal
    • Basic analytics
  • Enterprise$5000/monthly
    • Advanced governance
    • Multi-cloud support
    • Premium support
  • Custom$undefined/monthly
    • Custom solutions
    • Dedicated support
    • SLA guarantee

Bruno

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full IDE features
    • Git integration
    • Local storage

Which should you pick?

Choose Akana if

  • You need api lifecycle management.
  • You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
  • You also want api security.

Choose Bruno if

  • You need api testing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
  • You also want environment management.

Questions people ask

Is Akana or Bruno better?
Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Bruno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Akana or Bruno?
Bruno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2500/monthly for Akana and Free for Bruno.
Does Akana or Bruno run on more platforms?
Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
Can I use Bruno for free?
Yes. Bruno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akana starts at $2500/monthly.
What is Akana best used for?
Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Bruno is typically brought in for.
What can Akana do that Bruno cannot?
Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth. Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub.

Related pages

Other head to heads