Automation Integration · head to head
Blue Prism vs Hatchet

Blue Prism
Automation Integration
The digital exchange for intelligent automation
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -

Hatchet
Automation Integration
Postgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hatchet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Blue Prism no pricing displayed on the vendor homepage; Hatchet postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.
- They diverge on capability: Blue Prism covers RPA platform, Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blue Prism and Hatchet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blue Prism | Hatchet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1000/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per month by task run count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud |
| Founded | 2001 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blue Prism
- RPA platform
- Intelligent automation
- Robotic workers
- Process intelligence
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- Scalability
- 100+ connectors
Only in Hatchet
- Postgres-backed queue
- Durable execution
- DAG workflows
- Concurrency and fairness
- Rate limiting
- Cron and scheduling
- Multi-language SDKs
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blue Prism
- Workflow Automationnot Hatchet
- Data Integrationnot Hatchet
- Process Automationnot Hatchet
- App Integrationnot Hatchet
- API Connectivitynot Hatchet
Hatchet
- An AI product running long agent pipelines that must survive worker restarts and resume mid-workflownot Blue Prism
- A team that outgrew Celery and wants concurrency keys, fairness and rate limiting without building themnot Blue Prism
- An engineering group that wants durable execution self-hosted with no datastore beyond the Postgres they already runnot Blue Prism
- A multi-tenant SaaS that needs one noisy customer's jobs not to starve everyone else'snot Blue Prism
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blue Prism
- No pricing displayed on the vendor homepage
- Enterprise automation platform typically requires custom pricing and implementation agreements
Hatchet
- Postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.
- Data retention on the managed tiers is three days on Team and seven on Scale, which is short for debugging intermittent failures and forces you to export run history elsewhere.
- The step from the free tier to Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage, which is a large increment for a small team that simply needs a production SLA.
- Hatchet is a young company in a category with Temporal, Inngest and cloud-native alternatives already established, so ecosystem, hiring pool and third-party material are all thin.
- Self-hosting the MIT engine is realistic but you then run the engine, its Postgres and its workers yourself, and the managed features such as audit logs and support are not part of that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blue Prism
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- 1 bot
- Basic features
- Professional$3000/month
- 5 bots
- Advanced features
- Enterprise$10000/month
- Unlimited bots
- Dedicated support
Hatchet
Free- DeveloperFree
- First 100,000 task runs included
- $10 per million task runs after
- No card required
- Team$500/month
- Usage billed on top of the base fee
- 10 users and 5 tenants
- 3 day data retention
- Scale$1000/month
- Unlimited users and tenants
- 7 day data retention
- Audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 300 million plus runs a month
- Latency guarantees and custom SLAs
- SSO and audit logging
Which should you pick?
Choose Blue Prism if
- You need rpa platform.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want intelligent automation.
Choose Hatchet if
- You need postgres-backed queue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want durable execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Blue Prism or Hatchet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blue Prism starts at $1000/month and Hatchet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blue Prism or Hatchet?
- Hatchet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1000/month for Blue Prism and Free for Hatchet.
- Does Blue Prism or Hatchet run on more platforms?
- Blue Prism runs on Web, Desktop. Hatchet runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Hatchet for free?
- Yes. Hatchet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Blue Prism starts at $1000/month.
- What is Blue Prism best used for?
- Blue Prism is most often used for workflow automation, data integration, process automation, app integration. Of those, workflow automation and data integration are not what Hatchet is typically brought in for.
- What can Blue Prism do that Hatchet cannot?
- Blue Prism covers RPA platform, Intelligent automation, Robotic workers, Process intelligence. Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue, Durable execution, DAG workflows, Concurrency and fairness.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blue Prism: How much does SS&C Blue Prism cost?
SS&C Blue Prism does not publish pricing on their website. Platform pricing is customized based on deployment requirements, number of users, and selected modules. Organizations should contact their sales team or schedule a free trial to discuss pricing.
SourceHatchet: Is Hatchet open source?
Yes, the engine is MIT licensed and can be self-hosted, with a managed cloud offered alongside.
Hatchet: What does it cost?
Free for the first 100,000 task runs, then 10 US dollars per million. Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage; Scale is 1,000.
Hatchet: Why Postgres as the queue?
So durable task state lives in a database your team already backs up, replicates and can inspect with SQL, instead of a second system.
Hatchet: How does it compare with Temporal?
Lighter to adopt and operate, with a much smaller ecosystem and a lower throughput ceiling from the Postgres backend.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blue Prism vs UiPath
- Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere
- Blue Prism vs Nintex
- Blue Prism vs Tray.io
- Blue Prism vs Talend
- Blue Prism vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Blue Prism vs Paragon
- Blue Prism vs Workato
- Blue Prism vs Celigo
- Blue Prism vs Boomi
- Blue Prism vs n8n
- Blue Prism vs MuleSoft
- Blue Prism vs Meltano
- Blue Prism vs Orkes
- Blue Prism vs Polytomic
- Blue Prism vs Relevance AI
- Blue Prism vs SnapLogic
- Blue Prism vs Salesforce Flows
- Blue Prism vs Temporal
- Blue Prism vs Inngest
- Blue Prism vs Dagster
- Blue Prism vs Flowable
- Blue Prism vs jBPM
- Blue Prism vs Prefect
- Blue Prism vs Camunda
- Blue Prism vs Autonoly
- Blue Prism vs Decodable
- Blue Prism vs CrewAI
- Blue Prism vs Cyclr
- Hatchet vs UiPath
- Hatchet vs Automation Anywhere
- Hatchet vs Nintex
- Hatchet vs Tray.io
- Hatchet vs Talend
- Hatchet vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hatchet vs Paragon
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Celigo
- Hatchet vs Boomi
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Hatchet vs MuleSoft
- Hatchet vs Meltano
- Hatchet vs Orkes
- Hatchet vs Polytomic
- Hatchet vs Relevance AI
- Hatchet vs SnapLogic
- Hatchet vs Salesforce Flows
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs Inngest
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Flowable
- Hatchet vs jBPM
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Autonoly
- Hatchet vs Decodable
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs Cyclr
