Automation Integration · head to head
Boomi vs Hatchet

Boomi
Automation Integration
The world's leading cloud integration platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hatchet
Automation Integration
Postgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Boomi most pricing requires contacting sales; no transparent plan costs published; Hatchet postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.
- They diverge on capability: Boomi covers Cloud integration, Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Boomi and Hatchet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Boomi
- Cloud integration
- API management
- Master data management
- Trading partner network
- Process automation
- Real-time sync
- Monitoring
- Analytics
Only in Hatchet
- Postgres-backed queue
- Durable execution
- DAG workflows
- Concurrency and fairness
- Rate limiting
- Cron and scheduling
- Multi-language SDKs
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Boomi
- Integrating cloud and on-premises applicationsnot Hatchet
- API management and publishingnot Hatchet
- Master data management across systemsnot Hatchet
- EDI and B2B data exchangenot Hatchet
- Workflow automation between business systemsnot Hatchet
Hatchet
- An AI product running long agent pipelines that must survive worker restarts and resume mid-workflownot Boomi
- A team that outgrew Celery and wants concurrency keys, fairness and rate limiting without building themnot Boomi
- An engineering group that wants durable execution self-hosted with no datastore beyond the Postgres they already runnot Boomi
- A multi-tenant SaaS that needs one noisy customer's jobs not to starve everyone else'snot Boomi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Boomi
- Most pricing requires contacting sales; no transparent plan costs published
- Free trial is 30 days but requires sign-up
- Base plan limited to one environment and two users
Hatchet
- Postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.
- Data retention on the managed tiers is three days on Team and seven on Scale, which is short for debugging intermittent failures and forces you to export run history elsewhere.
- The step from the free tier to Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage, which is a large increment for a small team that simply needs a production SLA.
- Hatchet is a young company in a category with Temporal, Inngest and cloud-native alternatives already established, so ecosystem, hiring pool and third-party material are all thin.
- Self-hosting the MIT engine is realistic but you then run the engine, its Postgres and its workers yourself, and the managed features such as audit logs and support are not part of that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Boomi
Free- Base$99/month
- Pay-as-you-go
- One environment
- Two users
- Professional$undefined/mo
- Two environments
- Unlimited users
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited environments
Hatchet
Free- DeveloperFree
- First 100,000 task runs included
- $10 per million task runs after
- No card required
- Team$500/month
- Usage billed on top of the base fee
- 10 users and 5 tenants
- 3 day data retention
- Scale$1000/month
- Unlimited users and tenants
- 7 day data retention
- Audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 300 million plus runs a month
- Latency guarantees and custom SLAs
- SSO and audit logging
Which should you pick?
Choose Boomi if
- You need cloud integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want api management.
Choose Hatchet if
- You need postgres-backed queue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want durable execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Boomi or Hatchet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Boomi starts at Free and Hatchet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Boomi or Hatchet?
- Boomi starts at Free and Hatchet at Free.
- Does Boomi or Hatchet run on more platforms?
- Boomi runs on Web, On-premise. Hatchet runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Boomi for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Boomi best used for?
- Boomi is most often used for integrating cloud and on-premises applications, api management and publishing, master data management across systems, edi and b2b data exchange. Of those, integrating cloud and on-premises applications and api management and publishing are not what Hatchet is typically brought in for.
- What can Boomi do that Hatchet cannot?
- Boomi covers Cloud integration, API management, Master data management, Trading partner network. Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue, Durable execution, DAG workflows, Concurrency and fairness.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Boomi: What is Boomi's minimum monthly cost for pay-as-you-go pricing?
Boomi's base plan starts at $99 per month for pay-as-you-go usage with no contract required, including one environment and two users.
SourceHatchet: Is Hatchet open source?
Yes, the engine is MIT licensed and can be self-hosted, with a managed cloud offered alongside.
Boomi: Does Boomi offer a free trial?
Boomi provides a 30-day free trial with full platform access, including core integration features and data mapping capabilities.
SourceHatchet: What does it cost?
Free for the first 100,000 task runs, then 10 US dollars per million. Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage; Scale is 1,000.
Boomi: Which plans require contacting sales for pricing?
Professional, Professional Plus, Enterprise, and Enterprise Plus plans for Integration, API Management, and Data Hub require contacting Boomi sales for custom pricing.
SourceHatchet: Why Postgres as the queue?
So durable task state lives in a database your team already backs up, replicates and can inspect with SQL, instead of a second system.
Hatchet: How does it compare with Temporal?
Lighter to adopt and operate, with a much smaller ecosystem and a lower throughput ceiling from the Postgres backend.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Boomi vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Boomi vs Zapier
- Boomi vs MuleSoft
- Boomi vs n8n
- Boomi vs Tray.io
- Boomi vs Workato
- Boomi vs Celigo
- Boomi vs Jitterbit
- Boomi vs Talend
- Boomi vs Automation Anywhere
- Boomi vs UiPath
- Boomi vs Paragon
- Boomi vs Meltano
- Boomi vs Orkes
- Boomi vs Polytomic
- Boomi vs Relevance AI
- Boomi vs SnapLogic
- Boomi vs Salesforce Flows
- Boomi vs Temporal
- Boomi vs Inngest
- Boomi vs Dagster
- Boomi vs Flowable
- Boomi vs jBPM
- Boomi vs Prefect
- Boomi vs Camunda
- Boomi vs Autonoly
- Boomi vs Decodable
- Boomi vs CrewAI
- Boomi vs Cyclr
- Boomi vs Blue Prism
- Hatchet vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hatchet vs Zapier
- Hatchet vs MuleSoft
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Hatchet vs Tray.io
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Celigo
- Hatchet vs Jitterbit
- Hatchet vs Talend
- Hatchet vs Automation Anywhere
- Hatchet vs UiPath
- Hatchet vs Paragon
- Hatchet vs Meltano
- Hatchet vs Orkes
- Hatchet vs Polytomic
- Hatchet vs Relevance AI
- Hatchet vs SnapLogic
- Hatchet vs Salesforce Flows
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs Inngest
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Flowable
- Hatchet vs jBPM
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Autonoly
- Hatchet vs Decodable
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs Cyclr
- Hatchet vs Blue Prism
