Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Serverless Framework

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Serverless Framework
Cloud
Build and deploy serverless applications on AWS Lambda
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Serverless Framework exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Serverless Framework actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Serverless Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Serverless Framework
- YAML configuration
- Single command deployment
- Extensible plugin ecosystem
- Multi-language support
- Unified dashboard
- Built-in metrics and alerts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Serverless Framework
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Serverless Framework
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Serverless Framework
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Serverless Framework
Serverless Framework
- Deploying APIs and microservices to AWS Lambdanot Blacksmith
- Building event-driven applications with serverless functionsnot Blacksmith
- Managing multi-language serverless projectsnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Serverless Framework
- Exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers
- Paid tier requires credit system that can be confusing for budgeting
- Plugin ecosystem quality varies significantly
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Serverless Framework
Free- FreeFree
- For organizations with under $2M annual revenue
- All Framework features included
- Pay-As-You-Go$4/credit
- 1 credit = 1 Service Instance or 50K Traces or 4M Metrics
- Standard rate for larger organizations
- Reserved Credits$1/credit
- Discounts up to 74% off (1-year), 77% off (2-year), 80% off (3-year)
- Additional 10% off for upfront payment
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Serverless Framework if
- You need yaml configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation.
- You also want single command deployment.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Serverless Framework better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Serverless Framework at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Serverless Framework?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Serverless Framework at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Serverless Framework run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Serverless Framework runs on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Serverless Framework is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Serverless Framework cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration, Single command deployment, Extensible plugin ecosystem, Multi-language support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceServerless Framework: When do I have to pay for Serverless Framework?
The Serverless Framework CLI v4+ is free for organizations earning under $2 million annually. Organizations earning more must purchase credits at $4 per credit standard rate or reserved credits starting at $1 per credit with volume discounts.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceServerless Framework: What cloud providers does Serverless Framework support?
Serverless Framework is exclusive to AWS Lambda. It does not support other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceServerless Framework: What does one credit cover?
One credit equals 1 Service Instance, 50,000 Traces, or 4 Million Metrics.
SourceRelated pages
More on Serverless Framework
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Pulumi
- Blacksmith vs Nitric
- Blacksmith vs Packer
- Blacksmith vs SST
- Blacksmith vs Cerebrium
- Blacksmith vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Blacksmith vs Beam Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Deno Deploy
- Blacksmith vs Koyeb
- Blacksmith vs Terragrunt
- Blacksmith vs Neon
- Blacksmith vs Upstash
- Blacksmith vs Fastly
- Blacksmith vs Flux
- Blacksmith vs Google Cloud Platform
- Blacksmith vs HAProxy
- Blacksmith vs IBM Cloud
- Blacksmith vs kind
- Serverless Framework vs WarpBuild
- Serverless Framework vs Depot
- Serverless Framework vs Namespace
- Serverless Framework vs Earthly
- Serverless Framework vs Nx Cloud
- Serverless Framework vs OpsLevel
- Serverless Framework vs Garden
- Serverless Framework vs ConfigCat
- Serverless Framework vs Dagger
- Serverless Framework vs Nix
- Serverless Framework vs Rust
- Serverless Framework vs Ansible
- Serverless Framework vs PartyKit
- Serverless Framework vs PhpStorm
- Serverless Framework vs Pieces for Developers
- Serverless Framework vs RAD Studio
- Serverless Framework vs Refact
- Serverless Framework vs Pulumi
- Serverless Framework vs Nitric
- Serverless Framework vs Packer
- Serverless Framework vs SST
- Serverless Framework vs Cerebrium
- Serverless Framework vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Serverless Framework vs Beam Cloud
- Serverless Framework vs Deno Deploy
- Serverless Framework vs Koyeb
- Serverless Framework vs Terragrunt
- Serverless Framework vs Neon
- Serverless Framework vs Upstash
- Serverless Framework vs Fastly
- Serverless Framework vs Flux
- Serverless Framework vs Google Cloud Platform
- Serverless Framework vs HAProxy
- Serverless Framework vs IBM Cloud
- Serverless Framework vs kind
