Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Blacksmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Cloud, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Sourcegraph
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Sourcegraph
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Sourcegraph
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Blacksmith
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Blacksmith
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Blacksmith
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Blacksmith
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Sourcegraph?
- Blacksmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Blacksmith and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Blacksmith or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Yes. Blacksmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs Cody
- Blacksmith vs Sweep
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs Nixpacks
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs Octopus Deploy
- Blacksmith vs Okteto
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Sourcegraph vs WarpBuild
- Sourcegraph vs Depot
- Sourcegraph vs Namespace
- Sourcegraph vs Earthly
- Sourcegraph vs Nx Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs OpsLevel
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs ConfigCat
- Sourcegraph vs Dagger
- Sourcegraph vs Nix
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Ansible
- Sourcegraph vs Refact
- Sourcegraph vs Restate
- Sourcegraph vs RubyMine
- Sourcegraph vs Soketi
- Sourcegraph vs SonarQube
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Octopus Deploy
- Sourcegraph vs Okteto
- Sourcegraph vs PartyKit
