Development Tools · head to head
Deno vs Sourcegraph
D
Deno
Development Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Sourcegraph
Development Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Deno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Deno the runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026); Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Cloud, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Development Tools).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno
No use cases recorded yet. See the Deno review.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Deno
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Deno
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Deno
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Deno
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Deno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno
- The runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026)
- Deno Deploy Pro at $20 per month charges $2 per additional million requests and $0.05 per additional CPU hour once the included quota is exceeded, per deno.com/deploy/pricing
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Deno review.
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Deno or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno or Sourcegraph?
- Deno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Deno and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Deno or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Deno runs on Web. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Yes. Deno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.