Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Sourcegraph

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Depot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Depot | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, GitHub, CLI | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Depot does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Sourcegraph
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Sourcegraph
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Sourcegraph
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Depot
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Depot
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Depot
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Depot
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Sourcegraph?
- Depot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Depot and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Depot or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Yes. Depot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Cody
- Depot vs Visual Studio Code
- Depot vs ESLint
- Depot vs pnpm
- Depot vs Turborepo
- Depot vs Sweep
- Depot vs Bazel
- Depot vs GitHub Copilot
- Depot vs Moonrepo
- Depot vs Pieces for Developers
- Depot vs Rust
- Depot vs Nix
- Depot vs Octopus Deploy
- Depot vs Okteto
- Depot vs OpsLevel
- Depot vs PartyKit
- Sourcegraph vs WarpBuild
- Sourcegraph vs Blacksmith
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Buildkite
- Sourcegraph vs GitLab CI/CD
- Sourcegraph vs Namespace
- Sourcegraph vs Earthly
- Sourcegraph vs Nx Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs Dagger
- Sourcegraph vs Garden
- Sourcegraph vs Ansible
- Sourcegraph vs ConfigCat
- Sourcegraph vs Backstage
- Sourcegraph vs Bitbucket
- Sourcegraph vs Claude Code
- Sourcegraph vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Nix
- Sourcegraph vs Octopus Deploy
- Sourcegraph vs Okteto
- Sourcegraph vs OpsLevel
- Sourcegraph vs PartyKit
